... Jarda can have SVO or OVS word orders by fronting the subject or the object, so maybe Proto-Jardic had basic SVO order and allowed V to be fronted. (It s a
Message 1 of 15
, Feb 16
--- On Sat, 2/16/13, Herman Miller <hmiller@...> wrote:
Jarda can have SVO or OVS word orders by fronting the subject or the object, so maybe Proto-Jardic had basic SVO order and allowed V to be fronted. (It's a little harder to see how a verb-final language could switch to SVO, but I don't need to go back that far for now.)
ğjub-en ķitṛa-ja ģundi (VSO)
catch-PERF bat-ERG moth-ABS
"the bat caught a moth"
Kash can also have all three orders in a sentence like this, though SVO is the "normal" or default order. Is SVO, the O is the new info; VOS suggests that S is the new info. and there wouold be an intonation break between VO and S, OVS (or also OSV) is how they "passivize" it. It could further be made into a cleft sentence (it was a moth that the bat caught) by adding "na ya" -- O na ya, [inton. break] VS/SV.
Let me say generally-- I've been saving a lot of this thread, because it contains interesting ideas for developments from Proto-Kash, and probably also Proto-Gwr, which I'm still cogitating.
(I see also that "ķitṛaja" on the web page contradicts the "ķitṛala" that I've got in my Jarda documentation. I don't know which one is more recent, but "ķitṛaja" sounds more like the correct form. Maybe it could be a dialectal variation.)
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.