On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 00:49:17 -0400, "Albert LaFrance"
>And a further irony is that AT&T is (or was, as of early last year) offering
>tower space at Charlottesville 2, according to a spreadsheet on the AT&T
>Tower Group's web site which lists the AT&T-owned towers available for
>I don't have Excel and the file comes up password-protected on Quattro Pro,
>so I'm relying on the Feb. 2001 version which another researcher converted
>to text for me. In that version, the entry for Charlotesville 2 has the
>notation "(Restricted Site-Gov't)".
>CHARLOTTESVILLE (Restricted Site- Gov't)
Great link Albert! Thanks. But, that Excel file still lists
Charlottesville as you have it mentioned above.
Regarding Mount Diablo, I think it was a shame to remove it
considering its age, history, and its past importance (I was a year
too late to get pictures and inside). I was just there a few months
ago and they haven't bothered to plant anything in the open dirt. It's
just this large open spot of eroded soil. Took me a while to figure it
out as the Navy has a tower that looked like it once hosted horns
directly above where AT&T used to be.