THE SACK AND DESTRUCTION OF COLUMBIA Having taken Basic Training at Ft. Jackson, this is not an item I would disapprove of.Message 1 of 90 , Jul 31, 2006View SourceTHE SACK AND DESTRUCTION OF COLUMBIA
Having taken Basic Training at Ft. Jackson, this is not an item I would
Tony, I didn t read Mr. Huddleston as saying that Meridian was a fiasco but only that it was an instance where Sherman was in independent command. Also wasn tMessage 90 of 90 , Aug 7, 2006View SourceTony, I didn't read Mr. Huddleston as saying that Meridian was a
fiasco but only that it was an instance where Sherman was in
independent command. Also wasn't Sherman in independent at
--- In email@example.com, "Tony Gunter"
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Bob Huddleston"
> <huddleston.r@> wrote:
> > Keep in mind., also, that neither man had been in independent
> > Thomas' only independent command had been with a small numberleading
> up toCampaign.
> > Mill Springs two years before and Sherman's had been a fiasco in
> > early in the war and more recently, I guess, the Meridian
> I don't see how the Meridian Campaign can be considered a fiasco.
> Halleck would not allow Sherman to re-allocate the troops under
> command. Rather than have them sitting idle, he proposed a two-prong
> raid to clear out the Mississippi River Valley. One wing of thatraid
> would strike out for Meridian in the winter, and return toVicksburg in
> time to assist in the second wing's strike on Shreveport.only
> Given these parameters, the Meridian Campaign was a success. The
> secondary objective I pick up on in Sherman's correspondence isthat he
> would have liked to have drawn Polk into a battle. However, hefelt
> that Sooy Smith's failure to show up allowed Polk to flee fasterthan
> Sherman could bear upon him.