Very nice contribution, sir, and seems correct in all aspectsMessage 1 of 66 , May 2, 2005View SourceVery nice contribution, sir, and seems correct in all aspects
--- In email@example.com, "Jeff" <jblake47@y...> wrote:
> I've been following along with this discussion and wanted to get all
> the info absorbed before jumping in.
> All field artillery batteries had a limber equipped with:
> solid shot
> shell (hollow ball filled with powder)
> case shot (hollow ball filled with powder and small balls)
> All types of shot and shell were used by the artillery for the
> various purposes for which they were designed, and some for purposes
> not designed, i.e. firing case shot with no fuse so it would explode
> in the barrel and be ejected in a canister like manner against close
> infantry when the canister rounds were not available.
> Solid shot - good to take out wheels on opposing artillery pieces to
> make them immoble and easier to capture. Same for the wheels on the
> supply wagons. Also good for enflade fire on a line of infantry.
> With the ball's inertia going down the line, a large number of troops
> could be killed or injured with just one round.
> Shell - Good for concussion, into woods to shrapnel wood splinters,
> into the ground in front of charging cavalry, etc. More of a nusance
> round, but extremely unnerving.
> Case shot - same as above but with a mean bite instead of just being
> a loud nusance. Exploding 10' over the heads of an infantry line
> will definitely give notice.
> Both shell and case shot were dependent upon fuses. The
> effectiveness of the fuses depended on the knowledge of the
> cannoneer, his ability to judge distance, calculation on length of
> fuse, accuracy of fuse cut and whether or not the fuse ignited. The
> ingnition rate was about 97%.
> Obviously the case shot balls were of a small size.
> Canister shot was 1.0 caliber or 1" in diameter, which was 3-4X's the
> size of an infantryman's minnie ball, which varied from .54 - .69
> generally for the common majority of weapons.
> "Canister" shot larger than 1.0 caliber were really grape shot used
> in naval guns to strip ships of their rigging. The balls needed to
> be bigger to affect a more damaging effect on a more solid target
> than flesh and bone.
> Canister could be double charged with or without second powder bag
> with no ill-effect. When underfire, stripping the second bag off
> wasn't really of major concern as was getting the gun loaded.
> Triple canister will flip the gun over as was the case when it was
> tried at Gettysburg, Day three against Pickett's men.
> The firing effect of a battery of 6 guns using canister is the
> equivelent of a regiment of infantry (1,000 men) If you wish to do
> the math on that, please figure in that with the size and velocity of
> the canister ball, it did in fact hit more than one man.
> One must also consider the fact that firing canister in a rifled gun
> will put out a donut shaped pattern so as to have men directly in
> front of the gun getting missed by the projectiles but those to their
> right and left were hit. Smoothbores maintained the normal "shotgun"
> type of pattern and were far more effective.
... A Napoleon is a 12pdr, period, not a 6pdr or 20 pdr. The term 12pdr refers to the weight of the solid shot that the smooth bore cannon used.Message 66 of 66 , May 3, 2005View SourceOn 5/3/05, hank9174 <clarkc@...> wrote:
> >A Napoleon is a 12pdr, period, not a 6pdr or 20 pdr. The term "12pdr"
> > Hmmm, that's strange, I always thought the term Napolean meant the
> > style of gun, not it's caliber. I could have even bet that the 6#
> > Napolean was also a common gun on the field.
> The Napoleon style (stubby bronze tubes) did not scale well. A 12
> pounder is an incredibly heavy load.
> There are 20-lb Parrotts, which are rifled, but no 20-lb Napoleons
> which are smoothbores...
refers to the weight of the solid shot that the smooth bore cannon