And the belief that the economy must always continue growing. If the post-WWII housing crisis had been addressed through building of apartments, people wouldMessage 1 of 18 , Jan 15, 2007View SourceAnd the belief that the economy must always continue
growing. If the post-WWII housing crisis had been
addressed through building of apartments, people would
have bought a lot fewer cars and appliances.
Isolated, single-family houses were seen as a great
way to encourage large purchases which would in turn
create jobs. As houses became a financial investment
rather than a home in a community, owners worried more
about potential (though apparently rarely realized)
drops in property value if blacks moved into the
neighborhood, than about integrated, positive,
If people were happier, they would buy fewer
unnecessary things, and capitalism, at least as
currently defined, would falter. Unless we shake our
belief that the economy must always grow through
unfettered consumerism, I don't see much hope for
changing government policy away from encouraging
Of course I agree that racism is also a factor!!
but the middle class are going to be far more
concerned about property values than integrated
--- "J.H. Crawford" <mailbox@...> wrote:
> housing policies from the 1930s, which spawned
> are, at their heart, racist.
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
... Of note, the history of minimum parking requirements, a constant obstacle to carfree proposals, originated in Nazi Germany, with the following quoteMessage 1 of 18 , Jan 17, 2007View SourceOn Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Joel Siegel wrote:
>Of note, the history of minimum parking requirements, a constant obstacle
>>> As for *why* Americans approve of this jack-booted approach
>>> to "law enforcement," I just don't know. It's entirely clear
>>> that they do approve, however.
>> =v= Approval is generally coupled with a foolish notion that
>> the police are acting methodically and not abusing their power,
>> two tests which the cop failed in this case. This notion
>> is based on what most white Americans see; those who've seen
>> otherwise tend very quickly to dispense with this notion.
> We US'ers (at least the 'white' ones, as Jym notes) have been carefully
> trained, especially over the last thirty-odd years, to Be Very Afraid of
> The Criminals (and, of course, now The Terrorists as well), and thus to
> give the police more and more power. From passing draconian
> 'anti-crime' laws to electing 'tough on crime' judges to electing 'tough
> on crime' politicians who appoint 'tough on crime' judges, to deferring
> to the police (especially on juries) when it comes to misconduct, to
> giving the police a free pass except MAYBE when it's caught on video
> (and often not even then), we have pretty much created a police state
> Perhaps off-topic, but an excerpt from Milton Mayer's 1955 book _They
> Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45_ have been circulating the
> net and appearing on what little progressive radio we have here. The
> parallels are chilling. The book is available from University of
> Chicago Press, Paper US$22.00sp ISBN: 978-0-226-51192-4 (ISBN-10:
to carfree proposals, originated in Nazi Germany, with the following quote
attributed to you-know-who:
"Above all, it is the young who succumb to this magic.
They experience the triumph of the motorcar with the full
temperament of their impressionable hearts. It must be
seen as a sign of the invigorating power of our people
that they give themselves with such fanatic devotion to
this invention, the invention which provides the basis
and structure of our modern traffic."
-- Adolf Hitler
Further information as to the ties between U.S. auto makers and oil
companies to the Nazis is well documented. (For example, Ford was given a
public award by Hitler; U.S. auto makers helped build Nazi war machinery.)
> Excerpt at http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/511928.html; with[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> your indulgence I'll quote a few paragraphs here.
> "What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, little by
> little, to being governed by surprise; to receiving decisions
> deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so
> complicated that the government had to act on information which the
> people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if the people
> could not understand it, it could not be released because of national
> security. And their sense of identification with Hitler, their trust in
> him, made it easier to widen this gap and reassured those who would
> otherwise have worried about it.
> "This separation of government from people, this widening of the gap,
> took place so gradually and so insensibly, each step disguised (perhaps
> not even intentionally) as a temporary emergency measure or associated
> with true patriotic allegiance or with real social purposes. And all the
> crises and reforms (real reforms, too) so occupied the people that they
> did not see the slow motion underneath, of the whole process of
> government growing remoter and remoter....
> "...Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little
> worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for one great
> shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will
> join with you in resisting somehow. You donÿÿt want to act, or even
> talk, alone; you donÿÿt want to ÿÿgo out of your way to make trouble.ÿÿ
> Why not?ÿÿWell, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just
> fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine
> "Uncertainty is a very important factor, and, instead of decreasing as
> time goes on, it grows. Outside, in the streets, in the general
> community, ÿÿeveryoneÿÿ is happy. One hears no protest, and certainly
> sees none. You know, in France or Italy there would be slogans against
> the government painted on walls and fences; in Germany, outside the
> great cities, perhaps, there is not even this. In the university
> community, in your own community, you speak privately to your
> colleagues, some of whom certainly feel as you do; but what do they say?
> They say, ÿÿItÿÿs not so badÿÿ or ÿÿYouÿÿre seeing thingsÿÿ or ÿÿYouÿÿre
> an alarmist.ÿÿ"