If they don t make a new Penitent Engine model out of plastic I hope they do Resincast the old one. I don t like that heavy of a miniature. In fact I mMessage 1 of 39 , Jun 12, 2011View SourceIf they don't make a new Penitent Engine model out of plastic I hope they do Resincast the old one. I don't like that heavy of a miniature. In fact I'm selling the two I never put together on ebay.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "JosephP" <jpost0@...> wrote:
> It seems like there might finally be some love for all of us Sisters players. The rumors have been floating around out there about new sculpts and codex for a while now, but there might be some very firm news for the near future.
> Bell of Lost Souls posted a very definite sounding report that Sisters would be a White Dwarf codex ala Blood Angels in the July and August White Dwarf.
> This was followed up by a post just today on Warseer that included a scan of the upcoming month's White Dwarf contents. While there is some debate on the scan being a hoax, it's certainly something to think about.
> There's some thought that GW is 'testing the waters' to see if there's enough interest in Sisters to make a full codex.
> Other rumors include plastic 5-woman Sisters box that may be customizable to fit any squad type including Seraphim. This is hotly debated.
> I look forward to what the future brings.
Well, yeah. The Squats are the Demiurg from BFG, with their flying refineries. ... From: silashand Subject: [BTSS] Re: Sisters rumorsMessage 39 of 39 , Jun 16, 2011View SourceWell, yeah. The Squats are the Demiurg from BFG, with their flying refineries.
--- On Thu, 6/16/11, silashand <silashand@...> wrote:
From: silashand <silashand@...>
Subject: [BTSS] Re: Sisters rumors firming up
Date: Thursday, June 16, 2011, 11:13 AM
> I'm actually talking about there will not be another 'squatting' of
> a race. I.e. a race that is out being discontinued and unsupported.
> I know that there is a lot of talk of the squats being back in the
> Tau codex.
Ah, sorry. Misunderstood what you meant then.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]