--- In email@example.com
, "Frank Smith"
> > Steve
> > Of course it is - and more. But from that remark I'm getting the
> > impression that we may have misjudged you, Steve. Your problem may
> > naivete than what we have been criticizing you for.
Maybe so, Frank. In fact, I think you've touched on something very
important; Steve's sincere naivety of the chaos that he has caused. You
see, he asked a very naive question in the first place, which opened a
can of worms that he can't be expected to control. The criticism is
beyond his ken of comprehension, as he has no savvy, and is rather
apolitical. Maybe it would be more correct to say that he is a schmuck.
At least a schmuck knows something.