Re: « But still, just for the enormous tale of the Fall of Giants or the reshaping of global finances into a more streamlined, large scale global fascism runMessage 1 of 57 , Dec 8 7:19 AMView Source
Re: « But still, just for the enormous tale of the Fall of Giants or the reshaping of global finances into a more streamlined, large scale global fascism run by just a few Orwellians monsters, you have to admit, we have this front row seat, until the power goes out don't we? »
No problem admitting it and the part about when the power goes out seems to be something of an ongoing waiting game. For this, I find that we're not exactly situated in the front row seat, but rather that we're unmistakenly sunken in it, a bit like being caught off guard in quicksand - with our forces of Will at stake, that is.
Feel in need of another view of the deeds of Orwellian monsters?
VIDEO: Are Stephen Harper's Speeches Drafted in Washington DC?
Australia and Canada: exactly the same speeches
« Who's in charge?
I was under the impression that Canada and Australia were sovereign countries.
I guess not.
This video shows the heads of both these states reading the same exact statement - word for word - supporting the invasion of Iraq.
Who wrote this thing?
Who distributed it?
Who compelled these obvious puppets to read it?
The Queen? The CIA? Who runs these people.
Note: Canada's Harper was not yet Prime Minister when he made this speech selling out his country for god knows who - but he is now. »
--- In email@example.com, "holderlin66" <holderlin66@...> wrote:
> An Objectivist is a follower of Ayn Rand. She was a writer. Her most
> famous book is a novel, Atlas Shrugged.
> Bradford comments;
> Atlas was a giant, and it is odd, you know at Rockefeller Center, big
> statue of Atlas and we always think Atlas is holding the world, but It
> always was the Cosmos. Some recall that Hercules stepped in for Atlas
> once and almost didn't get out from under the weight of the world or the
> stars, except that Atlas was a Giant, like a Troll, somewhat large,
> slower and stupid and Hercules fooled him. But Atlas Shrugged, the Ayn
> Rand Intellectual Soul sort of pragmatic problematic global economy.
> Stock Markets, mountains and cities shake apparently if Atlas, or Wall
> Street in this case, shrugs. Atlas can shrugging can make global
> rattling like an 8 pointer on the richter scale, on the earthquake
> But still, just for the enormous tale of the Fall of Giants or the
> reshaping of global finances into a more streamlined, large scale global
> fascism run by just a few Orwellians monsters, you have to admit, we
> have this front row seat, until the power goes out don't we? Greenspan
> falls and Gold falls and the dollar sinks.....
> Ah, Alan Greenspan .... The Maestro, the Wizard. Just one year ago when
> CNBC did a TV special about him, it's title was Judging a Giant!
> An Objectivist is a follower of Ayn Rand. She was a writer. Her most
> famous book is a novel, Atlas Shrugged. In it, the capitalist
> entrepreneurs go on strike against the collectivist shlubs - government,
> the unions, and the working class in general - all of whom leach off of
> the great men, and the world collapses.
> The capitalist leaders go off to the wilderness to form their own little
> utopia, where they build railroads that run on time and airlines that
> never crash, and have hot, gorgeous, young, college educated heiresses
> desperate to bed them. They are also very fit and hunky - the
> entrepreneurs, that is, - who are all male.
> It's sort of a post-Nietzsche vision of supermensches. In it the only
> route to virtue is "a full, pure, uncontrolled, unregulated
> laissez-faire capitalism--with a separation of state and economics, in
> the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and
> She established a group. She was the leader, was surrounded by acolytes
> and devotees. Alan was among them.
> Anyway, that's where Alan Greenspan came from.
> His mind was full of Objectivist ideas. A belief that humans were
> rational. That self-interest would guide unregulated capitalist to do
> only sane and sensible things. Not every capitalist all the time, but
> enough of them often enough, that a capitalist system would be
> inherently beneficent and operate for the good of all.
> Free market capitalism - as a faith - really is an inverse of Marxism.
> It is a theology that believes their system will bring paradise on earth
> and moral perfection. When their system is in power in the real world,
> their true believers claim that any problem only happened because their
> ideology has not been applied with sufficient purity.
> Alan did very well for himself. He ran a consulting company that made
> tons of money. He was on the board of directors for Alcoa, Capital
> Cities/ABC, Inc.
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Company> , General
> Foods <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Foods_Corporation> , Inc.,
> J.P. Morgan & Co., Inc.
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPMorgan_Chase_%26_Co.> , and more. He
> dated Barbara Walters.
> In 1987, Ronald Reagan appointed him as Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
> He stayed on through Bush I and Bill Clinton
> Then along came George W. Bush.
> He was one of those gentiles. The kind who would take a Jewish idea,
> whether it was Christianity or free market economics, and ride it's
> ideology as far as circumstances would allow, unaware that he'd left
> it's humanistic heart behind.
> With nobody to restrain him, Greenspan put his full faith in the
> markets. He kept interest rates low. Which pumped money into the credit
> markets. He resisted regulations. When he was warned that real estate
> was blowing a big, big bubble, he refused to act.
> Because he believed in the inherent virtue of markets.
> So there he was, being quizzed by one of the heroes of the House of
> Representatives, Henry Waxman.
> First, Greenspan said, in a prepared statement, "Those of us who have
> looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect
> shareholder's equity (myself especially) are in a state of shocked
> Well, yes. One of the fundamentals of conservative, free market, laissez
> faire, Objectivist economics is that business people will act sanely and
> sensibly, thereby protecting people who trust in them. That's a
> theological belief. Now, watching the bubble burst, Greenspan was doing
> a remarkable thing, and he does deserve some credit for it. He was
> acknowledging reality!
> Then he said, "I made a mistake in presuming they were best capable of
> protecting their own shareholders." Which means they need to be
> regulated. By someone else. By government.
> "In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology,
> was not right, it was not working," Waxman said. Meaning this notion
> that individual greed would, as if "guided by an invisible hand," lead
> to the greatest social good.
> "Absolutely, precisely," Greenspan replied.
Colony Collapse ---- We are being subjected to a 100 year law, or 99 year law of three 33 s including the Great Depression of 1933 and as well that horrificMessage 57 of 57 , Dec 9 5:58 AMView Source
Colony Collapse ---- We are being subjected to a 100 year law, or 99 year law of three 33's including the Great Depression of 1933 and as well that horrific event of Feb 27, 1933. We are in the midst of an Occult Law upheaval that was indicated as well in Colony collapse studies we did on this list. The entire global economy is in Colony collapse and becoming Ahrimanically reformed due to a vast occult law of three X's 3. This law was noted as penetrating right down to the Sun Community of the way we handled Bees, all the way to the law of Education and results of educating humanity in a false, Ahrimanic and distorted manner would result in the corrupt monsters and whores of wall street becoming the children of Alan Greenspan, the children of Atlas Shrugged, the greedy, avarice ridden failure of humanity to check their impulses for the greater good as was thought should happen with freedom, however the infected and false educational system have created not only a Colony Collapse of the Bees, a Sun Beeings, but the Collapse of global Economy all on a 100 year occult law or 99 year law that Steiner talked of.
The Fed created a falsifed Occult model, without Initiation Science or the Christ Event, but based on an Ahrimanic school of training and holding captive various etheric Lodge models of souls, capturing their etheric models and training Ahrimanized cosmic Initiation to insert themselves into Archangelic activities, and enter everywhere globally, with IMF, International Monetary Fund and Federal Reserve and Wall Street, all gaining and maintaining Ahrimanic Initiation centers into the Economic System. And now the 99 year law has caught up to us, but we didn't instantly recognize the signs of Colony collapse and the indicators that Steiner drew.
Try Again Anthros; Try Again;
"Despite its name, the Federal Reserve System is not owned by the
federal government. It is actually a private company of bankers with 12
branches or central banks that expand and contract our money supply as
they have doing for nearly 100 years.
And, even though the Fed is not part of the US government, the Fed's
Board of seven governors is appointed by the president and confirmed by
the Senate for 14-year terms."
"Steiner...explained that the modern method of breeding queens (using
larvae of worker bees, a practice that had already been in use for about
fifteen years) would have long-term detrimental effects, so grave that:
"A century later all breeding of bees will cease if only artificially
produced bees are used...."
Steiner in another lecture made this grave prophecy:
"Let the kind of teaching that prevails in our universities continue for
another three decades, let social questions be treated as they are now
for thirty years more, and you will have a devastated Europe." He said
this in December, 1919; of course the prophecy was fulfilled in less
than thirty years."
Colony Collapse or was Steiner just one gloomy guy? Well to the
trivial, newbie and basic inattentive shrunken intellectual soul,
Steiner just must appear gloomy and making those statements to get some
sort of negative attention. NOT! O seriously not.