... Good point, Daniel. Global warming is only the top of the pollution iceberg. Pollution comes from too many consumers. We were 2.5 billions when I was bornMessage 1 of 84 , Mar 1, 2008View Source
> From: Daniel Branch [bxbggy@...]Good point, Daniel. Global warming is only the top of the pollution iceberg. Pollution comes from too many consumers. We were 2.5 billions when I was born in 1948; now we are 6.6. Scary! Once ensured decent living standard, a sex equalitarian society doesn't increase its population. Women don't really enjoy to be 'baby factories.'
> Women should be regarded as equal citizens with equal rights,not just walkin',talkin' > baby factories.
... fact ... countries? ... other ... a ... turned ... them ... that way. ... not a ... that ... problem. ... Oh, I m glad you agree that it has nothing to doMessage 84 of 84 , Mar 18, 2008View Source--- In WorldCitizen@yahoogroups.com, Taran Rampersad <cnd@...> wrote:
> jodemas2 wrote:
> > What the heck difference does which passport I have make to the
> > that they must pay for my ticket? Does the ticket somehow becomecountries?
> > more expensive because I used a WSA passport? I think not. Does
> > anyone have any information on the incidence of travelers only
> > holding a single, WSA passport being denied entry into
> > How often does that happen? Especially a traveler whose allother
> > papers are in order, and who can show financial solvency to entera
> > country, how often is such a traveler denied entry? because i'dturned
> > really like to ditch my national passport and only use the WSA.
> Let's pause for a moment.
> Let's say you run an airline. Let's say whenever someone gets
> back, you have to find a spot for them on a plane you own to sendthem
> back - at your cost. Lets say that you don't want to lose moneythat way.
> You might decide not to take that risk.
> Whether that is right or not is an ethical dilemma. The airline is
> part of a government. It is answerable to governments of nationsthat
> permit it to travel between places.problem.
> Do I agree with the situation? I'm not sure I do. But understanding
> *their* problem might help a little in understanding the broader
>Oh, I'm glad you agree that it has nothing to do with which I
passport I have.