As far as I am aware no meetings with Visitacion Valley residents occurred. I only found out about it by chance two ago when I saw the hearing on the SFGov
Message 1 of 1
, Oct 18, 2012
As far as I am aware no meetings with Visitacion Valley residents
occurred. I only found out about it by chance two ago when I saw the hearing on
the SFGov channel...
In a message dated 10/18/2012 3:16:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
in fact, the first I've heard about the city's plans to move the tow yard to
our side of town.
Have representatives, whomever they may be,
from our neighborhood, had the opportunity to meet with either the BOS and/or
relevant city officials involved with MTA, and has the supervisor in our
district opened a public hearing or meeting to discuss the potential impacts
of this business with the people who live in the vicinity? Wouldn't
there be an EIR or its equivalent for our neighborhood and not just the
neighborhood (South Park?) that may currently be affected by environmental
hazards of having a tow yard in the vicinity. This seems to me to be a
political decision, and not just a matter of redevelopment of the waterfront,
or even the inconvenience of filing for eminent domain.
I agree with
Edie, are we not residents of this area? You could easily say that the
area adjacent to Potrero Hill at 26th Street, facing Cesar Chavez equally fall
under the category of M1 status. The only difference is the residents of
Potrero Hill wouldn't allow a tow yard to open there. Seems terribly
convenient that Daly City gains, and our neighborhood may suffer the
Thanks for sharing this
----- Original Message ----- From: "Edie
Epps" <aheins@...> To: "Valley Eye"
<Valley_Eye@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:19:15
PM Subject: [!! SPAM] RE: [Valley_Eye] 2650 Bayshore will likely be
MTA's new tow yard site
Thanks Russel for trying to
get some solid answers to the questions you posed. But unfortunately they
skirted around the issues that are directly going to affect Visitacion Valley.
The main issue is traffic…the environmental docs provided from Daly City take
into consideration how traffic will impact Daly City by using
Talbert/Geneva/Bayshore in Daly City…how about the impact to Bayshore Blvd.
along Visitacion Valley from Sunnydale to Hester where vehicles will be towed
and owner will recover them. Most traffic will be going along Bayshore and not
Geneva. Traffic has been terrible since the MTA took two lanes away on
Bayshore for the T-Line. Check out the traffic in the morning and around 4 in
the afternoon. And when there are events at the Cow Palace Bayshore through
Visitacion Valley becomes a standstill trying to access Hwy. 101 going North.
The new hockey league that just started at the Cow Palace has already added to
the traffic. They mention 946 trips daily trips except Wed. when there will be
1546 daily trips. Did they really search out another site? Treasure Island;
Presidio; Dog Patch areas…they state that they wanted an M1 but are too close
to residential areas and do not encourage industrial use….what are we here in
Visitacion Valley? Residents? And we definitely don’t encourage industrial
use…we fought off Home Depot and don’t like the idea of CalTrain considering
the Bayshore as a repair facility but we’re ok with tow trucks coming through
our neighborhood night and day.
No jobs for Visitacion Valley
residents either! They will have approx. 300-350 employees at the site and
they wanted this site in Daly City because it has bathroom and lunch
facilities with no regards to the VV residents and traffic. Traffic =
Pollution and we have enough of that already!
But there again it was
passed by the BOS…right under our noses! They just went around us and didn’t
have any consideration for our residents who vote for them or many not!
Valley_Eye@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Valley_Eye@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
rmorine@... Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:51 AM To:
Valley_Eye@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Valley_Eye] 2650 Bayshore will likely
be MTA's new tow yard site
This item was approved by the
BOS on Tuesday in a 8-3 vote. See the below response from MTA thru Supervisor
Cohen's Office. Its a lot of info. Is this a good or bad thing for Visitacion
Valley? We'll have 20 years to discuss it.
Mr. Morine - The Supervisor raised a number
of these questions at today's hearing. But, I did want to send you additional
detailed responses to these questions/concerns in case you were not able to
see the hearing. Thank you for sharing your concerns with us. We found these
responses detailed and thoughtful and stressed to the MTA that we expect that
they and their contractor will continue to work with neighbors on any
complaints or issues that arise over the lifetime of this facility. Andrea
Question 1: If the relocation occurs then it would be fair to say
that while one community greatly benefits another community adds to its list
of undesirable land usages. How does this fit San Francisco’s environmental
justice and sustainability goal?
SFMTA response : The SFMTA and Port
of San Francisco entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for the use of
approximately 13 acres of property on Pier 70 for the SFMTA’s towed car
operations, storage and uses; the First Amendment of this MOU extended the
term to July 31, 2015. There is a one-year termination notice provision,
pursuant to which the SFMTA or the Port may terminate the MOU with 12 months’
notice. In concert with the Port’s intention of developing the Pier 70 area as
a mixed use opportunity area as highlighted in the Port’s Waterfront Land Use
Plan and the Port’s Pier 70 Area Preferred Master Plan , the SFMTA has been
searching for years for an equivalent-sized site to house its towed car
operations. The SFMTA’s timely relocation from Pier 70 will allow the Port an
opportunity to effectively execute part of its waterfront revitalization
Master Plan and further creates a win-win situation for both agencies on
accomplishing their respective strategic goals and objectives. Secondly, and
more importantly, the relocation would enable the SFMTA and AutoReturn to
improve conditions for employees and the public, as well as address
environmental concerns as to whether the towing and storage of vehicles is
negatively impacting the Bay at Pier 70. While using the Pier 70 site,
AutoReturn employees have had to work out of a temporary trailer and have had
to use portable bathroom facilities. At 2650 Bayshore Boulevard, they would
have a permanent structure to work out of, with indoor plumbing and lunchroom
facilities. There would be ample parking for auction days that does not spill
into surrounding neighborhoods, and auctions could be held inside in a
building in a sound building structure, one that does not leak profusely when
it rains, as is the case at Pier 70. Finally, although the Port, the SFMTA and
AutoReturn have all been diligent regarding safeguarding the site from
environmental impact, the Pier 70 site is literally on San Francisco Bay,
which causes additional challenges with regard to adapting the property to
suit vehicle storage. For these reasons, the site at 2650 Bayshore Boulevard
is simply more suited to vehicle storage functionality.
(since 2004), the SFMTA has been looking for alternatives to replace the 13
acres at Pier 70 due to the Port’s long-term plans to redevelop that property
and the unsuitable condition of the property for employees and the public as
well as storage of towed vehicles. The criteria for SFMTA property search
included the following: · Approximately 13 acres (necessary for towing
operations, current Pier 70 location is 13 acres); · Either in San
Francisco or adjacent to the City in order to avoid additional transportation
costs for towing as well as public access; · On or near public transit for
public access; · Appropriate zoning (M1 or M2); · Existing structure
in good condition of about 200,000 square feet for towing and storage of towed
cars; · Appropriate neighborhood that would accept towed car movement,
storage and weekly auction visitors; and · Acceptable environmental
condition to avoid significant remediation.
There are few, if any
similarly-sized sites in San Francisco or nearby. Other sites analyzed and
considered have major issues. Examples include:
· Properties with
owners who do not want to sell at this time and could require an eminent
domain process and be very costly to purchase the land and develop the
property. · Properties that have hazardous materials that need
significant, expensive remediation and mitigation measures.
Properties with owners who do not want to sell at this time and could require
an eminent domain process and be very costly to purchase the land and develop
the property. · Properties that have hazardous materials that need
significant, expensive remediation and mitigation measures.
Properties that are zoned Ml but are too close to residential areas and do not
encourage industrial use. · Properties that were re-zoned to uses other
than industrial or light industrial use
· Port properties, such as
Piers 94-96 along Cargo Way south of Islais Creek, which have State Trust
(allowed uses are commerce, navigation, fisheries, and open space) and the
SFMTA is not a long-term allowed uses
Is the tow operation 24/7? How
many tow trucks are currently deployed daily from Pier 70? How often do they
return and then leave again during a typical shift? How will this effect
traffic on Bayshore Blvd? The tow yard has weekly public vehicle auctions. How
many bidders routinely show up for these events? Will there be on-site
parking? Will the vehicle sales tax go to Daly City? How many employees work
on site (not driving tow trucks)? Will vehicles be stored outdoors (it appears
that hundreds are currently stored outdoors at Pier 70.)?
response: AutoReturn is the SFMTA’s current tow operator. Towed vehicles are
stored for the first 24 hours at a site on 7 th St. across from the Hall of
Justice in San Francisco. After 24 hours, approximately 50 vehicles a day are
expected to be towed to 2650 Bayshore for storage. The customer service
pick-up for autos is typically Monday-Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 8 p.m., although
customer pick-up may occur 24 hours a day as needed. The average customer pick
up is 25 vehicles a day. The proposed auction use will occur on Wednesday
mornings only between 8:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. It is anticipated that 300 people
may attend and approximately 100 cars are sold each Wednesday. Customers pick
up the cars at an alternate time. The other SFMTA uses may, for example,
include Enforcement, Training, and storage of SFMTA transit vehicles. If
Enforcement were to move there, the proposed hours of operation are 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week with a daily rotation of approximately 9 shifts. If
Training were to move there, SFMTA would operate in offices and training rooms
on a routine basis. New operator, maintenance and refresher training classes
will be conducted within the office training rooms proposed for approximately
300-350 employees throughout the day on rotating shifts. The previous USPS use
also operated 24 hours a day 7 days a week with approximately 320 employees
utilizing the site on a shift rotation throughout the day .
of the purchased vehicles are required to the California through the
Department of Motor Vehicles to register the vehicles. There is no sales tax
paid to either the City of San Francisco or the City of Daly City.
Because the address for the proposed Lease for 2650 Bayshore is in
Daly City, the Daly City Planning Department handled the CEQA environmental
review for the proposed Lease, and the SFMTA’s proposed uses are all allowed
under Daly City’s Planning Code. Attached is the approval from the Daly City
Council of the environmental documents, which are also attached. The San
Francisco Planning Department reviewed the City of Daly City Planning
Below are excerpts from the CEQA environmental
documents re: the Parking, Circulation and Traffic analysis prepared for the
City of Daly City:
This relocation will move jobs out
of San Francisco. How does this fit into the Mayor’s efforts to keep/bring
jobs to San Francisco?
SFTMA response: The jobs that are being
relocated by AutoReturn and the SFMTA are adjacent to San Francisco and
accessible to the residents of San Francisco and the Bay Area by riding
transit – the Muni’s T-Line, 9 San Bruno and 8AX, plus Caltrain’s Bayshore
Station all serve 2650 Bayshore Blvd.
Will there be expanded
employment opportunities for residents of Visitacion Valley?
response: The AutoReturn employment opportunities are listed at:
www.AutoReturn.com . The SFMTA’s and City of San Francisco’s employment
opportunities are listed at:
much in sales/business taxes will San Francisco lose (to Daly City’s gain)?
SFMTA response: Please see above. The sales tax for used vehicles is
paid to the State of California through the Department of Motor Vehicles.
There is no sales tax paid to either the City of San Francisco or the City of
Who will regulate / respond to site specific complaints?
For example, if tow back up alarms are heard at midnight, do residents call
the MTA or Daly City police?
SFMTA response: Phone numbers to call re:
site specific issues: AutoReturn (24/7): Hot Line Number 415-865-8200. For the
City of San Francisco (24/7): 311.
Andrea Bruss Office of Supervisor Malia Cohen City Hall, Room 244
(415) 554-7672 Andrea.Bruss@...
----- Forwarded by Malia
Cohen/BOS/SFGOV on 10/16/2012 11:43 AM -----
To: malia.cohen@..., Date: 10/15/2012 12:35 AM Subject: BOS
Agenda Item 10 - Real Property Lease - 2650 Bayshore concerns
Supervisor Cohen Item 10. 120904 - Real
Property Lease - 2650 Bayshore Boulevard - Towed Car Operations and Other
Transit Related Uses is schedule be heard at the Regular meeting of the Board
of Supervisors on October 16, 2012. This lease would allow the MTA to move a
needed, but arguably undesirable land use to a site that boarders Visitacion
Valley. Few, if any questions related to the impacts of this relocation were
discussed when it was heard in the Budget and Finance Committee. The MTA
stated their need to secure this particular location, but they did not provide
adequate background information as to how they planned to integrate this
intensive land use into an established neighborhood. Had MTA selected a site
within San Francisco, I am certain that they would have provided the affected
community some level of targeted outreach and responded to community feedback.
I understand that the terms of the lease is the item under question. However,
please query the MTA to your satisfaction regarding their commitment to ensure
that one community does not endure years of undesirable land usage simple to
facilitate their “Master Plan”. Below are a few questions that my community
would like to have addressed by the MTA: If the relocation occurs then it
would be fair to say that while one community greatly benefits another
community adds to its list of undesirable land usages. How does this fit San
Francisco’s environmental justice and sustainability goal? Is the tow
operation 24/7? How many tow trucks are currently deployed daily from Pier 70?
How often do they return and then leave again during a typical shift? How will
this effect traffic on Bayshore Blvd? The tow yard has weekly public
vehicle auctions. How many bidders routinely show up for these events? Will
there be on-site parking? Will the vehicle sales tax go to Daly City? How
many employees work on site (not driving tow trucks)? Will vehicles be
stored outdoors (it appears that hundreds are currently stored outdoors at
Pier 70.)? This relocation will move jobs out of San Francisco. How does
this fit into the Mayor’s efforts to keep/bring jobs to San Francisco?
Will there be expanded employment opportunities for residents of
Visitacion Valley? How much in sales/business taxes will San Francisco
lose (to Daly City’s gain)? Who will regulate / respond to site specific
complaints? For example, if tow back up alarms are heard at midnight, do
residents call the MTA or Daly City police? Thank you for your
consideration Russel Morine Little Hollywood/Visitacion Valley
resident 64 Gillette Ave
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email
settings: Individual Email | Traditional
change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Valley_Eye/join (Yahoo! ID
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from
this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to:
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.