No, but due to the title and topic I guess I ll have to read it. Sigh. Thomas G. Clemens D.A. Professor of History Hagerstown Community College ... I see thereMessage 1 of 74 , Apr 3, 2006View SourceNo, but due to the title and topic I guess I'll have to read it. Sigh.
Thomas G. Clemens D.A.
Professor of History
Hagerstown Community College
>>> recker@... 4/2/2006 5:42:59 PM >>>I see there is a new book by Donald Jermann coming out about the Lost
Order. has anyone read it? Thanks.
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "TalkAntietam" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hey buddy! It might have been in Fox s Regimental Losses in the Civil War. Also, to the best of my knowledge, Antietam had the highest number of surgeonsMessage 74 of 74 , Apr 9, 2006View SourceHey buddy! It might have been in Fox's Regimental Losses in the Civil
War. Also, to the best of my knowledge, Antietam had the highest
number of surgeons killed in a single battle: four. At Gettysburg I
think one was killed and thirteen wounded. I don't know how many
surgeons were wounded at Antietam, but know one or two surgeons from
the 14th Connecticut had a narrow escape at the Roulette Farm. Scott
--- In TalkAntietam@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Recker <recker@...> wrote:
> I'm trying to remember where I read that the 15th Mass. in the West
> Woods was one of only four regiments in the CW that suffered more
> 100 dead in a single engagement. Anyone know where I might've read
> that? Thanks.