... Steph, That s an interesting combination. How would you even begin to reconcile Mark Goodacre s rejection of Q with Maurice Casey s preference for no lessMessage 1 of 2 , Feb 10, 2006View SourceSteph Fisher wrote:
> I am especially influenced by the work of both MarkSteph,
> Goodacre and Maurice Casey ("An Aramaic Approach to Q")
That's an interesting combination.
How would you even begin to reconcile Mark Goodacre's rejection of Q with
Maurice Casey's preference for no less than five "Q"s? (Such a model is
proposed in the book of Casey's which you mentioned, though I don't have the
Web site: http://homepage.virgin.net/ron.price/index.htm