From Mr. O'Kelly,
I know what the Halberd is, however, when the punishment in the orderly books states that he was punished "at the halberds," you had some conflicting evidence.
First there were no halberds on the inventory.
The private in question did not recieve a punishment of any lashes, just a punishment of being reprimanded "at the halberds."
Can you clarify the above of just "being reprimanded at the Halberds" Did they make the Prisoner think he was going to be lashed and then just give him a stiff ass chewing?
Next, there is a civilian witness to this private being punished, but he is in the stocks.
So, I think in lieu of halberds, they put him in stocks, but they used the name "halberd" for traditional reasons.
What was the punishment mentioned above?
>Wasn't one of the punishments of our period tieing a man to
>halberds that had been made into a pyramid, then lashing him?
>I would think that your reference was being literal and referring to
>this method of flogging.
The only problem with that is the fact that there are no
In fact orders were given for officers to ditch the espontoons
and take up muskets.
Its kind of like the modern day Marine Corps. If you have
Captain's Mast, there is no mast. It is just called that due to
>Halberbs were the "spear. Spontoons were the /axe"
Actually it is just the opposite. Halberd is that axe thing. It
was made famous by those nasty old Swiss, when they used it as a knight
Herb Puckett of the 2nd South Carolina is one of the few guys I
know who carry one down here. He is usually referred to as that "guy with
2nd Regiment of the North Carolina Line
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Visit the RevList Homepage, which includes a list of sutlers, RevList member photos, FAQ, etc., at
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: please send a message to
with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]