a popular theme among the ancients,
was that hera sent two serpents to kill the baby heracles. numerous vase
paintings use this theme.
when i concluded that the fuente
magna depicted this theme, it was surprising that nobody echoed support.
it is a very important point, whose implications may guide us to the voyagers
who deposited it in bolivia.
it may be a votive bowl which the
ancients were fond of donating to their temples. there may be a buried
temple to heracles yet to be found in bolivia.
there were two prominent heracles,
the first about 10,000 bce. he was adopted by the greeks, and the
phoenicians, and was known, if not worshipped in egypt. he is said to be a
son of zeus, and a mortal mother. he made many travels, to tunis, and
across the trident sea in north africa. he looted troy. his fame was
known in northern europe. for the most part he was deified in europe and
in the 'oera de linda' book, with
corrected chronology, we have the frisian/magyar fleet, circa 9750 bce, founding
tyre and a temple to thor. tyre is thor corrupted. 7,000 years later
the tyreans rebuilt and dedicated the temple to heracles. alexander was
enraged by their refusal to allow him to worship in that temple. he
destroyed tyre about 330 bce.
the origin of the fuente magna seems
to point to tyre, prior to 330 bce. they may have worshipped heracles long
before 2750 bce. likely several temples were built within 7,000
years. so the fuente magna probably dates between 9750 bce and 330
bce. the phoenicians got their seamanship from the frisian founding of
tyre. they became the most capable of long sea voyages, by the charts they
inherited. the use of cuneiform could most likely date between 9750
bce and 2000 bce. it was a widely known script in those days.
the sailors could have picked up a scribe at some port along the way.
each nation would need scribes to keep in contact with babylon and
assyria. its likely that the change from thor to heracles began after the
trojan war, which i date to 5500 bce, thru hint by cayce. so maybe we can
pin the date of the fuente magna to between 5500 bce and 2000 bce, when tyre may
have been under greek domination. having a better idea of the approximate
date and origin, may speed the translation. i dont accept that it was an
oracle bowl, or the translation by winters. i believe king hiram reigned
during that time, his voyagers left an inscription in brazil, so we know he
reached south america. in fact his fleet made voyages to ecuador for
solomon, imho. reading that bowl will make it an incredible
find. i bet hiram is named on the bowl! the use of cuneiform should
not mislead scholars, scribes of many nations were available in seaports and
capitals, for trade and diplomacy.