--- hanzvoid <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> Totally made sense. Americans better have the nukes than Hitler.
> Perhaps we can learn from Einstein who knows better which side
> should he be.
Actually, the German themselves, even Einstein didn't want the
nukes to be built. They knew that it will be a dangerous weapon
of mass destruction. But the American government that time
continued and even tested the A-bomb on Japan which already
(bugbog na) offered complete capitulation. Note why they didn't
try it in Germany because the Americans still need the German
researchers for this kind of weapons. By the way, the psychotic
Hitler and his fanatic followers (including some clergies in the
Vatican) were also loosing when the Americans decided to
drop the bomb.
#THE GERMANS DECIDE NOT TO BUILD A BOMB
*The justification for using the atomic bomb was that it ended
the war, or at least ended it sooner and thereby saved countless
American-and Japanese-lives. But had it? Had not Japan been
defeated and was she not already on the verge of surrender?
What circumstances, it was asked, justified the fateful decision
that "blasted the web of history and, like the discovery of fire,
severed past from present"?*
> For the record it was the British who were first insecure about
> Germany's A-bomb.
> For the americans, it was all oppurtunity for them after
Sorry to hurt your pro-American ego :^) but TRULY, they are
opportunists and not only that, they are also egoists. They
always want to gain everything for themselves :^). I hope
they will soon realize what they are doing before its too late.
> To say that they (American people) didn't care is an outright
> ignorance. Tell that to all the dead. If Roosevelt was a little
> bit late to join, it was because of politics and has nothing
> to do with the american people as a whole.
That's the problem with some people (a lot in the Philippines),
they like denying the truth which is the real outright ignorance.
The US government didn't want to join the WW2, it's because
they REALLY didn't care. They got no business and will not
gain anything in the European war back then.
By History, the US government only intervenes when they can gain
something, so there are no such things as "preserving freedom"
or "safe a democracy". If this would be the real reasons, how
come they didn't intervene in the war of Yugoslavia? If US had
really cared for freedom and democracy they could have ended the
whole thing far earlier. As it all turns out, it doesn't even
pay for countries to be friends of US and get their support.
There is a long list of former friends becoming enemies of US.
Just think about Panama, where the former friend General Noriega
was brought down by the very Government that brought him there.
He was not trustworthy anymore and he must not remain in control
of the Panama channel. Even the great threat of Iraq and Saddam
Hussein is a self-made threat of the US! They were so afraid of
Iran and Khomeini, that instead they pushed Iraq and granted them
a terrific weapons-development program. Afghanistan is one of
the more recent stages for the freedom loving and altruistic USA.
The Taliban took over and the US-government called the Northern
Alliance a bunch of cutthroats and thieves! The Taliban were just
dragging their feet in negotiations about a wonderful oil-pipeline
when September 11 happened. This presented just another nice
opportunity for them to get rid of those unreliable Taliban and
put someone new at the table
and guess who would be next? The
Northern Alliance- the same people, the US called cutthroats
and thieves before. I just wonder how long this friendship will
last. Now, Saddam Hussein is indeed a dangerous man, but not really
half as dangerous a Bush. Imagine he has been announced as the most
dangerous man of 2002- Bush not Saddam! Saddam just fulfilled his
purpose as a shield against Iran, Khomeini is dead, and so Iran is
not that much trouble anymore. The only problem left in Iraq is to
get a US-conform government there, which will not hinder access to
important natural resources. Time will tell the truth, you don't
have to believe me. But what do you think will happen; if there
will be no weapons of mass-destruction to be found in Iraq? I hold
every bet, that US will find another way to wage war against Iraq
before April this year. The reasons are clear as mentioned above.
> Nothing to do with the American people as a whole ???? :^)
When it comes to war it's always the country as a WHOLE, it's
always the government and its people. Since you sound American,
whatever happens I bet, even if you don't like your foreign
policies you will still fight for your country when the war is
already there. It will be funny if your army will to go to war
without it's leader/government decision. So, it's still as a
whole. Just like what some American tourists being interviewed
in London last year on how they feel being Americans after all
what's happening; they said they are ashamed being known as one,
they rather say they are Canadians (So far, Canada has better
political system than US).
[Malas nyo lang si Bush ang naging presidente nyo ngayon kaya
pinagtatawanan ang US ng HALOS lahat ng bansa. Tama o palpak
man ang gobyerno, damay lagi ang mga tao, tropa ika nga.
Kaya itong gobyerno natin dapat hindi rin tatanga-tanga sa
pagsama sa gera ng US. Kapag may gera na, gusto o ayaw man ng
iba damay pa rin sila. Kaya sa pagpili ng leader dapat yung
may wisdom, hindi tanga, hindi uto-uto].
Sample of as a whole: When some Filipinos do mistakes abroad,
the bad image is always carried among the good ones-check our
OFWs stories. Foreigners thinks that all Filipinos are the same.
[Eh ang daming tangang Pinoy na puro kapalpakan ang ginagawa
sa ibang bansa, kaya tuloy kapag nalamang Pinoy pinagdududahan
> Im sure all those Filipino
> comfortwomen during WWII would agree with me on this.
Young Filipino scholars/researchers already published these
facts in the early 90s. So, regarding Filipina comfort women,
it's a Hoax.
Of course, the Japanese Imperial Army had some Filipinas as
their women [among them (today-70~80s) were already given
reparation payments] but not as many as the Japanese women
Note, Japan's population (73M) were already more than doubled
compared with us (16.4M) in 1940s. So, they brought their own
women (the first JAPAYUKIS: everybody should know this,
especially the Japanese) to entertain them during their
occupation in the Philippines.
> Thats no logic at all. In order to achieve peace you have to
> prepare for war. Imagine if all existing Nuclear Power countries
> today would destroy their WMD then a week after Iraq will have
> their Nukes on Kuwait, who will counter them?
Imagine WMD would be outlawed and US would not be able to play
Cowboy all over the planet anymore. If there are no weapons,
who would you need to be afraid of? Or is it just that's what
they are afraid of
the lack of fear?
If the UN would have a stronger support by the US too, there
would be no problem enforcing the ban on WMD. Unfortunately
US don't give a damn about the United Nations, because they
believe they have to answer only to God and not also to the
rest of the world....which they don't own yet.
> The americans doesnt have the right. Thats because they earned it.
> This is true. In recent history we have the Kurdish/Gas/Massacre
> and the invasion of Kuwait in early 90's. I wonder which one is
Kuwait was invaded, because US allowed it.....
To think that America should be the only one who has the right to
dominate :^))) is also an outright ignorance. Think about it.
Kaya mga Pinoy magbago na!