Browse Groups

• ## Re[2]: [PanoToolsNG] Extracting an equirectanglar from a MOV

(29)
• NextPrevious
• Hello Pat, try to locate up that s _4 then what match without rotation with up is _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5 Dorin
Jun 2, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Hello Pat,

try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
_0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5

Dorin

Sunday, June 3, 2007, 7:02:16 AM, you wrote:

PS> Rodolpho Pajuaba wrote:
>> You can load them in Pano2QTVR and convert to equirectangular, I think
>> it's the easiest and fastest.

PS> It's times like this when I feel like the scarecrow in The Wizard of
PS> Oz. You know, that part when he says "If I only had a brain." D'oh!

PS> I did put them into Pano2QTVR and completely missed the Convert to
PS> Equirectangular button. Do you think it's too big? =8^)

PS> Be that as it may it did give me an equirectangular but it's all jumbled
PS> up. What is the correct naming order for the cube faces (it's obviously
PS> incorrect the way it came out of the disassembler)?

>> Regards,
>> Rodolpho Pajuaba
>>
>> Pat Swovelin wrote:
>>> Dorin Godja wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> That gives me the 6 cube faces but I need an equirectangular image
>>> centered in the initial view of the MOV. If I can't extract the
>>> equirectangular image directly how can I generate it from the 6 cube
>>> faces?

PS> Pat Swovelin
PS> Cool Guy @ Large
• ... I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it s extracting the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the MOV after
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Dorin Godja wrote:
> Hello Pat,
>
> try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
> _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5

I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it's extracting
the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the
MOV after it's been repositioned. This can be easily tested by
repositioning the MOV with a specific object in the center of the
initial view and saving it. When Qmove2 JPG is run none of the faces
are centered around that specific object but one should be if it were
extracting the "current" cube faces vs. the original ones..

There's got to be a way that I can extract the current faces in the MOV
as opposed to the original faces in the MOV. Then when I convert them
to an equirectangular with Pano2QTVR it will have the same initial view
as the original MOV.

> Dorin
>
> Sunday, June 3, 2007, 7:02:16 AM, you wrote:
>
> PS> Rodolpho Pajuaba wrote:
>>> You can load them in Pano2QTVR and convert to equirectangular, I think
>>> it's the easiest and fastest.
>
> PS> It's times like this when I feel like the scarecrow in The Wizard of
> PS> Oz. You know, that part when he says "If I only had a brain." D'oh!
>
> PS> I did put them into Pano2QTVR and completely missed the Convert to
> PS> Equirectangular button. Do you think it's too big? =8^)
>
> PS> Be that as it may it did give me an equirectangular but it's all
> jumbled
> PS> up. What is the correct naming order for the cube faces (it's
> obviously
> PS> incorrect the way it came out of the disassembler)?
>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rodolpho Pajuaba
>>>
>>> Pat Swovelin wrote:
>>>> Dorin Godja wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That gives me the 6 cube faces but I need an equirectangular image
>>>> centered in the initial view of the MOV. If I can't extract the
>>>> equirectangular image directly how can I generate it from the 6 cube
>>>> faces?

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... I m not quite sure if I understand your problem? Are you simply trying to get an equirect with the center of it at the same pan value as in the original
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
On 3 Jun 2007 at 1:08, Pat Swovelin wrote:

> Dorin Godja wrote:
> > Hello Pat,
> >
> > try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
> > _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5
>
> I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it's extracting
> the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the
> MOV after it's been repositioned. This can be easily tested by
> repositioning the MOV with a specific object in the center of the
> initial view and saving it. When Qmove2 JPG is run none of the faces
> are centered around that specific object but one should be if it were
> extracting the "current" cube faces vs. the original ones..
>
> There's got to be a way that I can extract the current faces in the MOV
> as opposed to the original faces in the MOV. Then when I convert them
> to an equirectangular with Pano2QTVR it will have the same initial view
> as the original MOV.

I'm not quite sure if I understand your problem?

Are you simply trying to get an equirect with the center of it at the same pan value as
in the original mov?
Can't you just do that very easily with the offset tool in PS? Or use PTgui to do it (as
well as assemble the cube faces)?
But if you want this as an automated process, reading the initial view from the .mov and
all, it's a totally different story...--
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - panoramas and 3D
• ... You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter. But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view with the offset filter. Hans
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>
> Dorin Godja wrote:
> > Hello Pat,
> >
> > try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
> > _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5
>
> I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it's extracting
> the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the
> MOV after it's been repositioned. This can be easily tested by
> repositioning the MOV with a specific object in the center of the
> initial view and saving it. When Qmove2 JPG is run none of the faces
> are centered around that specific object but one should be if it were
> extracting the "current" cube faces vs. the original ones..
>
> There's got to be a way that I can extract the current faces in the MOV
> as opposed to the original faces in the MOV. Then when I convert them
> to an equirectangular with Pano2QTVR it will have the same initial view
> as the original MOV.

You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter.

But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view with the offset filter.

Hans
• ... No, I need to be able to do it with the MOV s current initial view. ... No, because that will wrap the distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2007 at 1:08, Pat Swovelin wrote:
>
>> Dorin Godja wrote:
>>> Hello Pat,
>>>
>>> try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
>>> _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5
>> I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it's extracting
>> the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the
>> MOV after it's been repositioned. This can be easily tested by
>> repositioning the MOV with a specific object in the center of the
>> initial view and saving it. When Qmove2 JPG is run none of the faces
>> are centered around that specific object but one should be if it were
>> extracting the "current" cube faces vs. the original ones..
>>
>> There's got to be a way that I can extract the current faces in the MOV
>> as opposed to the original faces in the MOV. Then when I convert them
>> to an equirectangular with Pano2QTVR it will have the same initial view
>> as the original MOV.
>
> I'm not quite sure if I understand your problem?
>
> Are you simply trying to get an equirect with the center of it at the
> same pan value as
> in the original mov?

No, I need to be able to do it with the MOV's current initial view.

> Can't you just do that very easily with the offset tool in PS?

No, because that will wrap the distorted top and bottom edges to
someplace in the middle of the image if the repositioned MOV's initial
view is looking up.

> Or use PTgui to do it (as
> well as assemble the cube faces)?
> But if you want this as an automated process, reading the initial view
> from the .mov and
> all, it's a totally different story...--

It doesn't have to be automated but I do want to be able to extract an
equirectangular image from a MOV and be able to create, for example, a
Flash pano with the same initial view as the MOV.

> Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - panoramas and 3D

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... *Aarrrgh!* There s got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC. ... Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap the distorted top and
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Hans Nyberg wrote:
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>> Dorin Godja wrote:
>>> Hello Pat,
>>>
>>> try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
>>> _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5
>> I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it's extracting
>> the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the
>> MOV after it's been repositioned. This can be easily tested by
>> repositioning the MOV with a specific object in the center of the
>> initial view and saving it. When Qmove2 JPG is run none of the faces
>> are centered around that specific object but one should be if it were
>> extracting the "current" cube faces vs. the original ones..
>>
>> There's got to be a way that I can extract the current faces in the MOV
>> as opposed to the original faces in the MOV. Then when I convert them
>> to an equirectangular with Pano2QTVR it will have the same initial view
>> as the original MOV.
>
> You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter.

*Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.

> But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view with
> the offset filter.

Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap the
distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of the image.

> Hans

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... Pat, you have two things here, for example an equirectangualr could have a door in middle but one can set as a starting point/view in .mov a window or
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>
> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
>
>
>
>

Pat, you have two things here, for example an equirectangualr could
have a door in middle but one can set as a starting point/view in .mov
a window or someting on the ceiling, still remain that equirectangular
with door in middle, so on the Mac way or PC way you can obtain what
you want but will not be the same thing, if you want to obtain same
start in a flash panorama you can use that "door in middle equirect"
wich you eventually obtain from extracting and converting in equirect,
and to set in that viewer pan, tilt and zoom for start as them are
in .mov

I you wish you can manage to put the window in middle of the equirect
openning that file in PTgui and set yaw, pitch, roll accordingly but
you will end up with a different equirect you'll see then why.

Dorin
• ... Maybe this will help? o) Create and equirectangular image from the Cube-faces with Pano2QTVR. o) Use Photoshop and Panorama Tools like this: - With
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...>
> wrote:
>
> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
>
>> But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view
>> with the offset filter.
>
> Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap
> the distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of
> the image.
>
>> Hans
>

Maybe this will help?

o) Create and equirectangular image from the Cube-faces with Pano2QTVR.

o) Use Photoshop and Panorama Tools like this:
- With PTAdjust Extract a 360 degree view (!)
Image settings:
HFOV: 360
Width and Height: = Same as original panorama Width and Height,
Format: PSphere
Yaw and Pitch: = Wherever you want your initial view

Panorama Settings:
HFOV: 360
Format: PSphere

After this I think you'll get the view that you want. However if you've
adjusted the Pitch, then you'll get a wavy horizon!

Regards,
Ingemar Bergmark
http://panoramas.bergmark.com
• ... I can not see the problem why you can not use your original equirectangular image and change the view with the offset filter. I do that all the time with
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>
> Hans Nyberg wrote:
> > You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter.
>
> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
>
> > But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view with
> > the offset filter.
>
> Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap the
> distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of the image.

I can not see the problem why you can not use your original equirectangular image and
change the view with the offset filter. I do that all the time with extracted images from the
movies I get.

If I understand you right you want the center of the equirectangular image to be at the
same initial center as the movie. I am not sure how Pano2QTVR does it but I assume you
have done some settings in the conversion which have changed the initial view.
That is just a setting in the movie and has nothing to do with the cubefaces.

Your extracted cubefaces will always be at zero tilt so you do not get any changes like you

Hans
• ... Hi Pat, maybe one solution would be to use PanocubePlus which is able to convert .mov file into equirectangular .tif file in a drag and drop process. Then
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:

>
> It doesn't have to be automated but I do want to be able to extract an
> equirectangular image from a MOV and be able to create, for example, a
> Flash pano with the same initial view as the MOV.
>

Hi Pat,

maybe one solution would be to use PanocubePlus which is able to
convert .mov file into equirectangular .tif file in a drag and drop
process.

Then make a small copy of the .tif file (eg. 500x1000 px) and play
with it into Pano2qtvr to find quickly the same initial view as your
original .mov. Once you found it, launch Pano2qtvr with the big .tif file.

http://www.panoshow.com/panocubeplus.htm

Just my 2 cts.

Rgds,

G.
• ... Are you tryng to get an equirect that is tilted the same as the initial view in the .mov? You can do that in PTgui, but the result will be a very wavy
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
On 3 Jun 2007 at 1:33, Pat Swovelin wrote:

> Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure if I understand your problem?
> >
> > Are you simply trying to get an equirect with the center of it at the
> > same pan value as
> > in the original mov?
>
> No, I need to be able to do it with the MOV's current initial view.
>
> > Can't you just do that very easily with the offset tool in PS?
>
> No, because that will wrap the distorted top and bottom edges to
> someplace in the middle of the image if the repositioned MOV's initial
> view is looking up.

Are you tryng to get an equirect that is tilted the same as the initial view in the .mov?
You can do that in PTgui, but the result will be a very wavy horizon !

> > Or use PTgui to do it (as
> > well as assemble the cube faces)?
> > But if you want this as an automated process, reading the initial view
> > from the .mov and
> > all, it's a totally different story...--
>
> It doesn't have to be automated but I do want to be able to extract an
> equirectangular image from a MOV and be able to create, for example, a
> Flash pano with the same initial view as the MOV.

I would think that most viewers allow you to set an initial view, regardless of the
source image?
--
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - panoramas and 3D
• Hi Pat, ... The initial view has nothing to do with the tilings. What ever is 0,0 at the time of tiling will be tile 0 or 1. These 3Dcords get wired later upon
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Hi Pat,

> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
The initial view has nothing to do with the tilings. What ever is 0,0 at
the time of tiling will be tile 0 or 1. These 3Dcords get wired later upon
input of wysiwyg or numerical setting.

Panotools PTAdjust plugin will extract from your eq whatever cords you put
in. You have to know the cords of the initial view. You could load the
original movie into DevalVR viewer and show the camera infos to read the
coords for tilt and pan.

Cheers, Milko

--
Milko Amorth
360° Immersive Imaging
Photographic Virtual Reality
604.561.5101

PhotoScrapbook at Flickr.com/photos/vrdundee
Skype me @ vrdundee
Member of IVRPA.org
Contributor to the World Wide Panorama Project
• PTGUI panorama editor, use the numerical adjust, with the input set to equi 360 and panorama set to rectangular & fov matching the quicktime window. Then when
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
PTGUI panorama editor, use the numerical adjust, with the input set to equi
360 and panorama set to rectangular & fov matching the quicktime window.
Then when it looks the same, reset the panorama back to equi 360 and call it
a day.

Sacha Griffin
Southern Digital Solutions LLC
www.southern-digital.com
www.seeit360.net
www.ezphotosafe.com
404-551-4275
404-731-7798

_____

From: Pat Swovelin [mailto:Panoramas@...]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 4:41 AM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Extracting an equirectanglar from a MOV

Hans Nyberg wrote:
> --- In PanoToolsNG@ <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>> Dorin Godja wrote:
>>> Hello Pat,
>>>
>>> try to locate up that's _4 then what match without rotation with up is
>>> _0 then go matching to the right in order _1 _2 _3 the down is _5
>> I figured out the correct order but the problem is that it's extracting
>> the faces of the cube that is in the MOV vs. extracting the faces of the
>> MOV after it's been repositioned. This can be easily tested by
>> repositioning the MOV with a specific object in the center of the
>> initial view and saving it. When Qmove2 JPG is run none of the faces
>> are centered around that specific object but one should be if it were
>> extracting the "current" cube faces vs. the original ones..
>>
>> There's got to be a way that I can extract the current faces in the MOV
>> as opposed to the original faces in the MOV. Then when I convert them
>> to an equirectangular with Pano2QTVR it will have the same initial view
>> as the original MOV.
>
> You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter.

*Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.

> But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view with
> the offset filter.

Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap the
distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of the image.

> Hans

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
• ... While you can effectively pan left and right using Photoshop s offset filter to change the view, you cannot likewise pan up and down. There is no
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans Nyberg" <hans@...> wrote:
> I can not see the problem why you can not use your original
> equirectangular image and change the view with the offset filter.

While you can effectively pan left and right using Photoshop's offset
filter to change the view, you cannot likewise pan up and down. There
is no wraparound vertically in the equirectangular image as there is
horizontally. i.e. unlike the left and right sides of the
equirectangular, the nadir and zenith are not contiguous on the 360x180
sphere.

You can change the view by remapping the image in PTGui and using the
numerical transform option to move the required feature to the centre
of the output area. If that's all that's required, then the job is
done. However, if a .mov file is generated from that remapped image,
it will not behave at all like the original movie, although it may
start by displaying the required view. It will exhibit all the faults
of an unlevelled panorama.

John
• That s quite right now that I think about it. It s pointless to do what Pat wants. He only needs to extract the tilt information for viewer reference, and
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
That's quite right now that I think about it. It's pointless to do what Pat
wants. He only needs to extract the tilt information for viewer reference,
and possibly the pan information if you want to do SOME orientation.

Pan is easily done with the offset as everyone has suggested.

I wonder however, if there couldn't be some standard extension in the IPTC
or exif data for initial viewpoint.

Sacha Griffin
Southern Digital Solutions LLC
www.southern-digital.com
www.seeit360.net
www.ezphotosafe.com
404-551-4275
404-731-7798

_____

From: John Houghton [mailto:j.houghton@...]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 1:05 PM
To: PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PanoToolsNG] Re: Extracting an equirectanglar from a MOV

--- In PanoToolsNG@ <mailto:PanoToolsNG%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com,
"Hans Nyberg" <hans@...> wrote:
> I can not see the problem why you can not use your original
> equirectangular image and change the view with the offset filter.

While you can effectively pan left and right using Photoshop's offset
filter to change the view, you cannot likewise pan up and down. There
is no wraparound vertically in the equirectangular image as there is
horizontally. i.e. unlike the left and right sides of the
equirectangular, the nadir and zenith are not contiguous on the 360x180
sphere.

You can change the view by remapping the image in PTGui and using the
numerical transform option to move the required feature to the centre
of the output area. If that's all that's required, then the job is
done. However, if a .mov file is generated from that remapped image,
it will not behave at all like the original movie, although it may
start by displaying the required view. It will exhibit all the faults
of an unlevelled panorama.

John

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
• 20+ posts later I m still wondering why you d need to do that ? link and case-story would certainly help me understand and figure ways around -m ... don t
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
20+ posts later I'm still wondering why you'd need to do that ?
link and case-story would certainly help me understand and figure ways
around

-m

--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to extract an equirectangular image from a MOV?
>
> I need to be able to do this and maintain the initial view in the
> repositioned MOV (that's very different from the original
> equirectangular image). In effect I want to decompile the MOV. I
don't
> want to have to go back and regenerate the equirectangular image from
> PTGui because ofttimes there is MAJOR post-production work that I don't
> want to be forced to do all over again.
>
>
>
>
>
> Pat Swovelin
> Cool Guy @ Large
>
• ... And therein lays the rub, virtually every time I set an initial view it includes both pan and tilt. I did a quick test with this concept and as promising
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Ingemar Bergmark wrote:
>> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...>
>> wrote:
>>
>> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
>>
>>> But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view
>>> with the offset filter.
>> Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap
>> the distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of
>> the image.
>>
>>> Hans
>
> Maybe this will help?
>
> o) Create and equirectangular image from the Cube-faces with Pano2QTVR.
>
> o) Use Photoshop and Panorama Tools like this:
> - With PTAdjust Extract a 360 degree view (!)
> Image settings:
> HFOV: 360
> Width and Height: = Same as original panorama Width and Height,
> Format: PSphere
> Yaw and Pitch: = Wherever you want your initial view
>
> Panorama Settings:
> HFOV: 360
> Format: PSphere
>
> After this I think you'll get the view that you want. However if you've
> adjusted the Pitch, then you'll get a wavy horizon!

And therein lays the rub, virtually every time I set an initial view it
includes both pan and tilt.

I did a quick test with this concept and as promising as it sounded it
doesn't work because the bottom of the pano is now off to the side and
it looked like it was shot with the new nauseacam (I was getting ill as
I panned around). Darn it.

> Regards,
> Ingemar Bergmark
> http://panoramas.bergmark.com
>
>
>
>
>

--
Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... Exactly. The problem, as it turns out is that when you have a different equirectangular image (based on some pan and tilt numbers) the bottom of the pano
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Hans Nyberg wrote:
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>> Hans Nyberg wrote:
>>> You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter.
>> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
>>
>>> But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view with
>>> the offset filter.
>> Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap the
>> distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of the image.
>
> I can not see the problem why you can not use your original
> equirectangular image and
> change the view with the offset filter. I do that all the time with
> extracted images from the
> movies I get.
>
> If I understand you right you want the center of the equirectangular
> image to be at the
> same initial center as the movie. I am not sure how Pano2QTVR does it
> but I assume you
> have done some settings in the conversion which have changed the
> initial view.
> That is just a setting in the movie and has nothing to do with the
> cubefaces.
>
> Your extracted cubefaces will always be at zero tilt so you do not get
> any changes like you

Exactly. The problem, as it turns out is that when you have a different
equirectangular image (based on some pan and tilt numbers) the bottom of
the pano is now off to the side and the thing looks like it was shot
with the new NauseaCam (it made me ill just to look at it). So the
concept of having a new equirectangular image that's pre-tilted and
panned won't work (darn it).

> Hans

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... Thanks but as it turns out it won t work because a differently positioned equirectangular image will have the bottom off to the side and the verticals are
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Guillaume Fulchiron wrote:
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't have to be automated but I do want to be able to extract an
>> equirectangular image from a MOV and be able to create, for example, a
>> Flash pano with the same initial view as the MOV.
>>
>
> Hi Pat,
>
> maybe one solution would be to use PanocubePlus which is able to
> convert .mov file into equirectangular .tif file in a drag and drop
> process.
>
> Then make a small copy of the .tif file (eg. 500x1000 px) and play
> with it into Pano2qtvr to find quickly the same initial view as your
> original .mov. Once you found it, launch Pano2qtvr with the big .tif file.
>
> http://www.panoshow.com/panocubeplus.htm
>
> Just my 2 cts.

Thanks but as it turns out it won't work because a differently
positioned equirectangular image will have the bottom off to the side
and the verticals are all over the place.

Darn it.

> Rgds,
>
> G.

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... Clearly that s what I ll have to do. I don t know what I was thinking but clearly wasn t in the equation. I think I need a nap ... ... or a beer.
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2007 at 1:33, Pat Swovelin wrote:
>
>> Bjørn K Nilssen wrote:
>>> I'm not quite sure if I understand your problem?
>>>
>>> Are you simply trying to get an equirect with the center of it at the
>>> same pan value as
>>> in the original mov?
>> No, I need to be able to do it with the MOV's current initial view.
>>
>>> Can't you just do that very easily with the offset tool in PS?
>> No, because that will wrap the distorted top and bottom edges to
>> someplace in the middle of the image if the repositioned MOV's initial
>> view is looking up.
>
> Are you tryng to get an equirect that is tilted the same as the
> initial view in the .mov?
> You can do that in PTgui, but the result will be a very wavy horizon !
>
>>> Or use PTgui to do it (as
>>> well as assemble the cube faces)?
>>> But if you want this as an automated process, reading the initial view
>>> from the .mov and
>>> all, it's a totally different story...--
>> It doesn't have to be automated but I do want to be able to extract an
>> equirectangular image from a MOV and be able to create, for example, a
>> Flash pano with the same initial view as the MOV.
>
> I would think that most viewers allow you to set an initial view,
> regardless of the
> source image?

Clearly that's what I'll have to do. I don't know what I was thinking
but "clearly" wasn't in the equation. I think I need a nap ...

... or a beer.

Probably both.

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... Thanks, Milko. ... Pat Swovelin Cool Guy @ Large
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
Milko Amorth wrote:
> Hi Pat,
>
>> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
> The initial view has nothing to do with the tilings. What ever is 0,0 at
> the time of tiling will be tile 0 or 1. These 3Dcords get wired later
> upon
> input of wysiwyg or numerical setting.
>
> Panotools PTAdjust plugin will extract from your eq whatever cords you
> put
> in. You have to know the cords of the initial view. You could load the
> original movie into DevalVR viewer and show the camera infos to read the
> coords for tilt and pan.

Thanks, Milko.

> Cheers, Milko

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• ... Man, did it ever. It was making me ill just to look at it. ... Pat Swovelin Cool Guy @ Large
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
John Houghton wrote:
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans Nyberg" <hans@...> wrote:
>> I can not see the problem why you can not use your original
>> equirectangular image and change the view with the offset filter.
>
> While you can effectively pan left and right using Photoshop's offset
> filter to change the view, you cannot likewise pan up and down. There
> is no wraparound vertically in the equirectangular image as there is
> horizontally. i.e. unlike the left and right sides of the
> equirectangular, the nadir and zenith are not contiguous on the 360x180
> sphere.
>
> You can change the view by remapping the image in PTGui and using the
> numerical transform option to move the required feature to the centre
> of the output area. If that's all that's required, then the job is
> done. However, if a .mov file is generated from that remapped image,
> it will not behave at all like the original movie, although it may
> start by displaying the required view. It will exhibit all the faults
> of an unlevelled panorama.

Man, did it ever. It was making me ill just to look at it.

> John

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• An extracted equirect can t possibly work. *THANKS* for all of your help everyone and I m sorry I ve wasted your valuable time. Thankfully this IS the end of
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
An extracted equirect can't possibly work. *THANKS* for all of your
help everyone and I'm sorry I've wasted your valuable time.

Thankfully this IS the end of the thread.

Pat Swovelin
Cool Guy @ Large
• I think you are proceeding under a false assumption. The front cube face and the center (left-right) portion of the equirectangular image MIGHT correspond to
Jun 3, 2007 1 of 29
View Source
I think you are proceeding under a false assumption.

The "front" cube face and the center (left-right) portion of the
equirectangular image MIGHT correspond to the Initial View values of
a QTVR movie, but there is nothing that says they MUST.

Further, neither the exacted cube faces, nor an extracted
equirectangular image contain information that corresponds to the
Initial View values for a QTVR movie. [It is true that the data
inside a QTVR movie, probably tiles, can be reordered so that tiles
"in front of" the viewer occur earlier in the file, but trying to
unravel THAT to figure out the initial view seems like far more work
than is necessary, especially since the initial view info is ALREADY
IN a QTVR movie.]

That is, you CANNOT reliably derive the initial angle of view (and
zoom, or window size) from the extracted cube faces. Assuming that's
what you're hoping to do. That information is not in there!

eo

On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:24 PM, Pat Swovelin wrote:

> Hans Nyberg wrote:
>> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Pat Swovelin <Panoramas@...>
>> wrote:
>>> Hans Nyberg wrote:
>>>> You can only do this on Mac with Cubic Converter.
>>> *Aarrrgh!* There's got to be a way to be able to do it on a PC.
>>>
>>>> But it is easy to just open it in photoshop and change the view
>>>> with
>>>> the offset filter.
>>> Not if the initial view is tilted up/down because that will wrap the
>>> distorted top and bottom edges to someplace in the middle of the
>>> image.
>>
>> I can not see the problem why you can not use your original
>> equirectangular image and
>> change the view with the offset filter. I do that all the time with
>> extracted images from the
>> movies I get.
>>
>> If I understand you right you want the center of the equirectangular
>> image to be at the
>> same initial center as the movie. I am not sure how Pano2QTVR does it
>> but I assume you
>> have done some settings in the conversion which have changed the
>> initial view.
>> That is just a setting in the movie and has nothing to do with the
>> cubefaces.
>>
>> Your extracted cubefaces will always be at zero tilt so you do not
>> get
>> any changes like you
>> assume. Your reassembled equirectangular will be exactly as your
>> original.
>
> Exactly. The problem, as it turns out is that when you have a
> different
> equirectangular image (based on some pan and tilt numbers) the
> bottom of
> the pano is now off to the side and the thing looks like it was shot
> with the new NauseaCam (it made me ill just to look at it). So the
> concept of having a new equirectangular image that's pre-tilted and
> panned won't work (darn it).
>
>> Hans
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.