While I agree that Tamas should have asked permission to post his message, I'd like to point out that the negative comments you mention have to do with thinking the message was about a competition, not a stock business (the 'commenter' actually says he didn't read the message).
Loic Le Guilly
Web developer & Photographer
www.ultimedia.com.au & www.lophoto.com
Tamas Varga wrote:
> Though I do not consider this a spam in any form since I received only
> positive feedback from members and I hope this service will be
> beneficial for the panorama community.
This post is fishing for negative feedback. There were at least two of
them on <http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/photopanorama/
Please stop making false representations and abusing the moderator's
notice and the listmembers patience to further your advertisment.
It's the recipient's opinion that qualifies a message as spam, not the
sender. IMO, your first post was acceptable but this second one is spam.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]