--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com
, "William Donelson" <wd@...> wrote:
> Could this be an issue of Platform?
> Windows NT, XP, XP SP2, Vista
> Mac OSX 10.4 versus Windows whatever
> Mac PowerPC or Intel CPU ?
After reding Michels message a couple of times I believ he is talking about reducing size
from a very large size to a very small size, less than 5% of the original.
This is something I would never do as it has always been known that this will give you a
very soft image.
After doing some searches I found this.
What CS3 does is not making it softer but it actually seems to sharpen it slightly.
After doing some new tests resampling from 10000 to 600 pixels I can confirm that CS3
does sharpen it slightly.
It is similar to using the standard sharpen tool.
> --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "Hans Nyberg" <hans@> wrote:
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, michel thoby <thobymichel@> wrote:
> > > I have checked by comparison testing this morning that PS CS3 is
> > > absolutely ruining the sharpness of the photograph when reducing the
> > > file size (with bicubic interpolation at least).
> > >
> > > Can anyone confirm this finding?
> > No I checked a 5000x10000 resized to 3000x6000 CS2 - CS3/MAC bicubic
> > There is absolutelly no difference from CS2
> > Hans