På Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:48:23 +0200, skrev Erik Krause <erik.krause@...
> Am 27.08.2011 14:31, schrieb Will:
>> I think it is 16mm film of two different iso ratings interwoven and
>> perhaps sandwiched between glass in a 8x10 format (15 images wide x
>> 16mm = 240mm or 10 inches). Or the film could be interwoven, exposed
>> and the warp and the woof developed separately but I think it was all
>> processed together. Note discoloration at the edges where the strips
> It seems to be 16mm film indeed. Compare the sprocket holes:
> It should be possible to identify the film by the numbers printed along
> the sides. I could read J72, but didn't find that f.e. on
> Still no idea how he got the film nontransparent (you can see through
> the sprocket holes)...
What if he sprayed a white paint on the backside of each strip to make it opaque?
Wouldn't it be like printing with ink on a white paper?
Or would the positive film require light behind it?
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no
- 3D and panoramas.