...except the fact that this http://www.panoramaphotographer.com/comparisons/ doesn t include krpano tiled panos, even though I requested it be included there.Message 1 of 64 , Oct 1, 2009View Source...except the fact that this
http://www.panoramaphotographer.com/comparisons/ doesn't include krpano
tiled panos, even though I requested it be included there. :(
www.360cities.net - The World in Virtual Reality
tel. +420 608 076 502 / skype jeffrey.s.martin
Re: linked time-series of panoramas
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/message/33230;_ylc=X3oDMTJzdHBnbmk1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzE4MjI3ODQ4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAwNjQ5NgRtc2dJZAMzMzIzMARzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDdm1zZwRzdGltZQMxMjU0NDA2MzI3> Posted[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> by: "Trausti Hraunfjord" trausti.hraunfjord@...
> <trausti.hraunfjord@...?Subject=+Re%3A%20linked%20time-series%20of%20panoramas> blueslander
> <http://profiles.yahoo.com/blueslander> Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:00 pm (PDT)
> It is impossible to draw any conclusion from download times of one or the
> other being better or worse, when the examples are placed on completely
> different servers, different images, different layouts, different
> continents, different... the whole thing. That is why
> http://www.panoramaphotographer.com/comparisons/ is such a darn good
> initiative. Putting all the eggs in one basket... so to speak. It is the
> only fair model of comparing the different players there is. Everything
> else is just "noise" and "opinions".
... All flash players does. At least the 4 main ones. Pano2VR has it as standard option FPP has it by using tiled QTVR and KRpano can also do it with QTVR orMessage 64 of 64 , Oct 1, 2009View Source--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Keith Martin <keith@...> wrote:
>All flash players does. At least the 4 main ones.
> Sometime around 1/10/09 (at 16:26 +0200) Jeffrey Martin | 360Cities.net said:
> >even though I requested it be included there. :(
> Aww, turn that frown upside down Jeffrey. ;-)
> Seriously though, it was and is a good point. The reason it isn't
> included in what's there now is because that is supposed to be an 'as
> it comes'-style set of comparisons. For the sake of the sanity of the
> group helping to get this done, if nothing else!
> But yes, now that that's done there are further things that would be
> good to show as well.
> Tiled content. Which players support this?
Pano2VR has it as standard option
FPP has it by using tiled QTVR
and KRpano can also do it with QTVR or with tiled cubefaces.
Tiled multiresolutionn is a completelly different case.
I get back to why that is not always working as it should.