Hey Peter, that looks good! After some test with my far too big nbulky 5D I ve had plans for using a webcam instead, but because I didn t expect image qualityMessage 1 of 39 , Feb 28, 2009View SourceHey Peter, that looks good!
After some test with my far too big'nbulky 5D I've had plans for using
a webcam instead, but because I didn't expect image quality to be
anywhere near acceptable yet I put everything on hold for the time
being. Your image shows it can be done with cameras already available,
What would you estimate the 35mm equivalent of the lens of your camera
to be? Or, in other words, how many rows and columns would be needed
for a 360x180 with reasonable overlap?
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, "panovrx" wrote:
> Trouble with dinosaurs --
> the little guy is about 8mm high and the viewpoint is about 1.5cm
> off the ground
> The Logitech Orbit actually has motorized pan and tilt, but the
> rotation is not NPP and it is not quite as small as the Logitech
> Notebook Pro, but the optics etc are the same.
> Peter Murphy
Here is another kind of orbit webcam, also good for capturing panoramic views http://www.vimeo.com/3712183 ... I ve programmed it to look where I want prettyMessage 39 of 39 , Mar 17, 2009View SourceHere is another kind of "orbit" webcam, also good for capturing panoramic views
... I've programmed it to look where I want pretty much
This movie is actually with my Logitech/Sunex webcam, being about the central 140 degrees of the fisheye view. The lighting is from the LED on the webcam -- a handy thing for closeup views, pity it is red.
--- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Ken Warner <kwarner000@...> wrote:
> Gotham City! The first thing I thought was Batman.
> The images stitch well.
> What if you moved the lens farther from the sensor so that you
> could take 4 around. More detail. Sharper -- maybe? Or would you
> loose focus?
> panovrx wrote:
> > Ok here is a work in progress
> > http://www.mediavr.com/bridgestmodel.htm
> > This model is very dark in sections with the available lighting and looks much more colorful (though less atmospheric) with flash -- so I will try a panorama with flash next.
> > Here btw is what it looks like with flash (with my Canon TX1 cameras)
> > http://www.mediavr.com/3d/?p=46
> > Here are some shots of the model with the standard Zeiss lens on the webcam
> > http://www.mediavr.com/modelviews/webcamviews.htm
> > Peter Murphy
> > --- In PanoToolsNG@yahoogroups.com, Ken Warner <kwarner000@> wrote:
> >>This is a great project!
> >>Can we see some stitched panos?
> >>panovrx wrote:
> >>>I've done a bit more testing with my mini-fisheye webcam (Sunex 216 minifisheye lens + Logitech Notebook Pro webcam). The No Parallax Point is close to the front of the lens -- about 2mm behind the front glass surface, about 1mm behind the beginning of the metal lens barrel.
> >>>The images stitch ok, and the image circle calibrates to about 185 (probably 187 like they say) with low a, b, c distortion values. This corresponds to the visual appearance -- which looks normal fisheye, without the edge compression of the 10.5mm Nikkor.