What is the evidence for the Big Bang? All Big Bang evidences
presuppose that atoms are perpetual motion machines, since the time
atoms formed and the universe became opaque to light. The
explanations for the Big Bang are like a mystery cult. Only an
initiate can understand the universe. It cannot be understood with
simple explanations such as: at one point the universe was the size of
a pea. Why? Because it was the vacuum (space itself) that was being
formed by the Big Bang. This is elitist knowledge akin to the
priests of Marduk. Only they had the omen lists and mathematical
skills to understand what the planet gods were supposedly doing. The
Big Bang cannot be understood with metaphors or observations.
Ordinary people who are not priests of science cannot possibly
understand how the vacuum of space expands and creates and moves matter.
Supposedly at large scales the universe has homogeneity. Yet we
observe that all distant matter is different from local matter. We
observe those long "fingers of god" pointing back to the earth from
all directions. The fingers are merely graphs, mapped with the idea
that matter does not change, only the vacuum changes. Halton Arp
pointed out that the fingers are really long strings of galaxies where
matter intrinsically changes as they are ejected from large active
One of the alleged evidences is that the universe is 73% invisible
energy, 23% invisible matter and only 3% atoms (of which only 1/3rd
are visible). The myth that the universe is 99% invisible was
constructed mathematically using the historical, foundational
assumption upon which science was invented - that matter does not
intrinsically change itself. Yet we can see with sight that all
matter changes its visible properties. We don't need to invoke myths
or magic to accept the universe as we see it if we were allowed to
question the creed of science.
One of the alleged evidences is the Cosmic Background Radiation.
Supposedly the vacuum / space stretched primordial light so much that
it once had angstrom wavelengths and now has millimeter wavelengths.
No experiment ever detected vacuums stretching light. Blackbodies are
usually plotted intensity versus wavelength. The CMBR is potted
intensity versus cycles per centimeter, a non linear scale. If the
horizontal axis is linear, then the vertical axis becomes "intensity
per unit wavelength" rather than intensity. If it were plotted like
most blackbodies, the curve would be backwards and ordinary people
might question the alleged evidence. What is the CBR? ESA is this
year launching a space-telescope to image the early universe. I
predict they will continue to see an infinite number of even more
distant fully formed galaxies. (The Hubble cannot see the earliest
universe yet it saw 10,000 fully formed galaxies in 9 square minutes).
The CMBR is the light from quadrillions of ancient galaxies that
shone from minuscule atoms at millimeter wavelengths. No primordial
galaxy shines with the light from perpetual motion atoms. We see
primordial galaxies often linked in chains, like equally spaced beads
on a necklace. We see the tiny globs packed with stars coming out,
spiraling out to form the diffuse structures we see in local galaxies.
When we compare billions of galaxies at all visible ranges, we see
the history of the universe. All galaxies violate every law of
physics as they contradict the idea that atoms are perpetual motion
machines. Matter's inertial properties, its quantum frequencies and
the space it takes up keeps visibly changing as the universe ages.
Yet all matter is doing what the Bible states, fundamentally changing
(phthora). Why did God make so many galaxies? He says the heavens
declare His glory and teach knowledge to all people without words or
language. All the people can see His glory. Look with sight instead
of an assumption!