Here s one of the two messages David B. Willis posted today to the coCBanned list attacking Pi (my comments following):Mar 3, 2011 1 of 1View SourceHere's one of the two messages David B. Willis posted today to the coCBanned list attacking Pi (my comments following):
> From: David B. WillisNotice how David B. Willis' message does not reflect what the "which" is to which Pi is responding.
> To: coCBanned@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2011
> Subject: Pi's opposition to YEC
> DW here
>> Which goes a long way to explain
>> my opposition to YEC. From my
>> (admittedly anecdotal) experience
>> the ratio of those lost to the faith
>> by YEC versus those converted to the
>> faith by it is around 10-1. For that
>> reason, I consider YEC more of a
>> danger to the faith than atheism.
> You know if you would just toss out ALL the
> miracles of the Bible, instead of 90% of
> them, you might "convert" a few more who
> refuse to believe what the Bible actually
> It is a devil's bargain to make the kind
> of exchange you make in order to "convert"
It just so happens that the "which" has to do with something I posted here and which was included in Pi's message to the coCBanned list.
I wonder why it is that David B. Willis didn't include that in his message. Was he being deliberate in posting a message that gave no indication as to what Pi was talking about?
Does it have something to do with David B. Willis' spite towards me, simple-minded me; the one who has outwitted him over and over again?