--- In MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com
, "carbonprobe" <carbonprobe@y...>
> --- In MEG_builders@yahoogroups.com, "overunity2001" <harti@h...>
> > The 2 input coils are probably in series
> I don't think so. The picture shows 4 wires going to the input
> If you look very closely you can see a two position terminal block
> with 2 wires (black and red) situated on the housing of each input
> coil. This suggests that the input coils are not in series but are
> controlled the way the patent says and Bearden has always stated -
> alternatively pulsing input coils.
Hmm, well, yes, but maybe they have just connected the 2 input coils
on the PCB together in series...
This could also be...
> And I bet the IC is a PIC that was programmed by them.
Hmm, I don´t see a quartz crystal which is probably needed to drive
th PIC processor.
Has a PIC 14 pins ? The used IC has 14 pins.
> In the MEG I believe you have to have alternatively pulsing input
> coils to make the permeability of the core higher, which allows you
> to apply less input current to get a given B field in the core. #
Well if you look closely into the input current scope trace, do you
see any difference in the input current from each pulse ?
I don´t see any difference, which tells me, that the 2 coils are
probably energized together in a bridge configuration as I have
Well, I could be of course wrong, but the scope shots tell me this
configuration which I have drawn.
> > and then when the square
> > wave is ON, the 2 coils in series push the flux from the
> > magnet from the right leg to the left leg and when the square
> > OFF, the coils are switched in polarity so that the flux is pushed
> > from the right leg to the left leg.
> > Very easy operation.
> > The trick is probably in the right working point on the BH curve
> > the core and the fact, that the input coils just are so small in
> > width, this makes the flux volume they cover of the core very
> > and thus the counterEMF from the secondary coils are probably
> > small, so there is the gain in OU.
> > The power gain is probably directly converted from the
> > environmental heat to electrical energy via the magnets and the
> > so these should get at least 1 or 2 deegrees colder.
> > Regards, Stefan.