What is the use of reasoning about the nature of grace if one does not
> experience its action in oneself? What is the use of declaiming about the
> light of Tabor if one does not dwell in it existentially? Is there any sense
> in splitting theological hairs over the nature of the Trinity if a man has
> not within himself the holy strength of the Father, the gentle love of the
> Son, the uncreated light of the Holy Ghost?
This is the content of Tradition. Without this content, the reading of
Scripture is meaningless � for the Scriptures are a word spoken from a world
that is itself life with God.
Read the rest of this post by Fr. Stephen Freeman here:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]