This is really insane. Why does Russia , once again, want to control other nations, as they say in this article .. Russia s contention that it is entitled toMessage 1 of 2 , Aug 31, 2009View Source
This is really insane. Why does Russia , once again, want to control other nations, as they say in this article
“ .. Russia 's contention that it is entitled to a modern sphere of influence on the fringes of Europe ..”
It is by far the largest country in the World . Almost twice as large as the 2’nd largest country. Why would such a large country, want to have influence/control, over more land/people ? Don’t they have enough to do inside their own country ? Talk about “ power hungry “ ?
See enclosed graph.
Russia occupies 17.1 Million Square Kilometers, and Canada has 10 ( most of it frozen), China 9.3, and USA a distant 4’th at 9.2
From: Kresy-Siberia@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Kresy-Siberia@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Lucyna Artymiuk
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 11:30 PM
To: 300PolishSquadron@yahoogroups.com; Kresy-Siberia@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Kresy-Siberia] The war? Nothing to do with Stalin, says Russia 's president, Dmitry Medvedev
The war? Nothing to do with Stalin, says Russia's president, Dmitry Medvedev
It is a debate that has raged in European capitals ahead of the 70th anniversary on Tuesday of the beginning of the second world war on 1 September 1939. Who, apart from Hitler, was actually responsible for starting it?
This summer the Baltic states have blamed Hitler and Stalin equally. Russia, meanwhile, is fingering Poland .
Ultimately, however, the row which threatens to eclipse a gathering on Tuesday of European leaders in Gdansk is not about history or the past. It is all about the present, specifically Russia 's claim of having "privileged interests" in its post-Soviet neighbours. Russia 's president, Dmitry Medvedev, made his own explosive contribution to the debate, saying it was a "flat-out lie" to suggest that Stalin bore any responsibility for starting the second world war, which he described as "the 20th century's greatest catastrophe". According to Medvedev, it was Stalin who in fact "ultimately saved Europe ".
In an interview with Rossiya TV earlier today, Medvedev let rip at the EU Baltic states and Ukraine , accusing them of rewriting history, glorifying fascism, and obscuring the Soviet Union's unique leading role in the liberation of Europe . He also blasted the EU and its Organisation for Security and Co-Operation in Europe (OSCE), which, in July, passed a resolution equating Stalinism with Nazism.
"The OSCE parliamentary assembly just recently grouped together Germany and the Soviet Union , pronouncing them to be equally responsible for world war two," Medvedev said. "Now that, quite frankly, is a flat-out lie."
Medvedev recognised that there could be "different attitudes" toward the Soviet Union . But he alleged that there could be no debate at all over "who started the war, which country killed people, and which country saved people, millions of people, and which country, ultimately, saved Europe ".
He accused governments in the Baltic states and Ukraine of "pronouncing former Nazi accomplices to be their national heroes". Western Europeans were allowing eastern Europeans to get away with this outrageous revisionism, he suggested, because they were fearful of souring relations.
The pronouncements from Russia 's president came as the leaders of Russia , Germany , Poland , Ukraine , and Lithuania prepared to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the war in the Polish city of Gdansk . Russia is sending Vladimir Putin, Russia 's hawkish prime minister, whose presence near the place where Hitler began his Polish invasion, shelling a military depot, is unlikely to dispel the present rancour.
Old tensions are resurfacing amid frantic attempts by Moscow to defend the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, signed by Germany and the Soviet Union 's foreign ministers 70 years ago last week.
The deal saw Hitler and Stalin carve up Europe, with Moscow subsequently annexing Estonia , Lithuania , Latvia , two-thirds of Poland and much of Romania .
The Kremlin now argues that Stalin had no choice but to forge the pact with Hitler in August 1939. It says Britain and France made war inevitable by signing the Munich agreement. And it puts the boot firmly into Poland ; the Kremlin says the country was a willing Nazi ally and accomplice to Hitler's partition of Czechoslovakia the previous year.
Historians are unimpressed. "This is a very stupid argument," Vladimir Ryzhkov, a historian and former Russian opposition MP said. "You are saying that Poland was bad for allowing the division of Czechoslovakia , but that Stalin was good when he agreed to divide eastern Europe with Hitler."
He added: "The Kremlin wants to create a new identity for the Russian nation. It advocates the Stalin regime, and promotes the idea that Stalin's actions were right and necessary at all times, including when Stalin signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact."
According to Ryzhkov, Russia 's contemporary leadership is seeking to rehabilitate Stalin in order to justify its own "authoritarian" model.
He described Hitler as the "creator" of the second world war, who bore responsibility for it, but said that the Soviet Union, the US , Britain , France , and the Baltic republics also had to shoulder blame for the conflict.
So far, there are few signs that the dispute will fade. Russia has promised to reveal more documents about Poland on Tuesday from the secret archives of the SVR, Russia 's foreign intelligence service. They follow the declassification of other top-secret surveillance documents, used by Moscow last week to defend Stalin's occupation of eastern Europe.
In May, Medvedev announced that he was setting up a new body to counter what he called the "falsification of history". The commission, dominated by members of Russia 's FSB intelligence service rather than professional historians, would ensure that history teaching stressed Russia 's heroic sacrifice during the war, Medvedev said, and it would combat foreign "revisionists", he said.
Russia's contention that it is entitled to a modern sphere of influence on the fringes of Europe has caused consternation in the EU and elsewhere. But, speaking historically, it is a view Stalin would undoubtedly have shared.