Browse Groups

• ... I agree with all of these except orthoconjugate I m afraid (and correspondingly antiorthoconjugate of course). I think this is very likely to mislead,
Message 1 of 5 , Aug 9, 2000
View Source
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Bernard Gibert wrote:

> > In my work, I've been using the following ad hoc nomenclature:
> > lines through P orthogonal to PA, PB, PC: orthocevians (of P)
> > intersections of orthocevians with opposite sides: orthocevian feet
> > (but I like Bernard Gibert's "orthotraces" better)
> > line connecting the orthotraces: orthocevian line or orthocevian
> > axis
> > tripole of orthocevian line: orthopoint
> >
> I do not mind at all to change my denominations : they were temporary and
> maybe a bit clumsy because there is no polarity underneath.
>
> May I propose we stick to :
> orthocevians, orthotraces, orthocevian line, orthopoint or orthoconjugate
> [ I far prefer orthoconjugate], orthoassociate,, antiorthoconjugates...

I agree with all of these except "orthoconjugate" I'm afraid
(and correspondingly "antiorthoconjugate" of course). I think this is
very likely to mislead, because it's usually understood in mathematics
that "conjugacy" is used for a symmetrical 1-1 relation. Since your
"orthoconjugacy" is an asymmetric 2-1 relation, it's an inappropriate
name.

On the other hand, "orthopoint" seems a bit weak, so I don't much
like that either! A better word would be "orthopole", if it weren't
for the fact that that's already been used for a different relation,
because after all it's the tripole of the orthocevian line. Perhaps
"orthoimage", though I can't work up much enthusiasm even for that.
"Orthocevian point" is wonderfully descriptive (as was "orthocevian
line"), but is a bit long. How about that as the full form, and
"orthoceviant" as a slangy abbreviation?

JHC
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.