Browse Groups

• ## Re: [GraphingCalcUsers] twisty rod and fourier series

(6)
• NextPrevious
• On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:10 PM, C Goodman-Strauss wrote: Hello, in the Advanced Applied class I m teaching (aka A First Look at Fourier Series Stuff), we are
Message 1 of 6 , Aug 1, 2006
View Source
On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:10 PM, C Goodman-Strauss wrote:
Hello, in the Advanced Applied class I'm teaching (aka A First Look at
Fourier Series Stuff), we are going over solving various physically
motivated boundary value problems. A problem came up today, describing
the motion of a rod fixed at one end, given a vigorous twist and
released. The solution seemed a little weird looking, so I made a GC
file to take a look. I dunno, does this look realistic?
Have fun,
Chaim

----------
No!
At first glance it didn't seem right
Then looking closer I expected the twist to start at the moving end and
travel downward to the fixed end

So I would say it looks OK with n
going 0 to 1, 2 to 3, 4 to 3, and 2 to 1

But to me it doesn't look right with n
going 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 3 to 2, and 1 to 0

a good distraction to my busy day
Arne
• ... This looks great!! It certainly looks plausible. There are interesting little sub-twists going on within the twists. This brings up the whole fascinating
Message 1 of 6 , Aug 1, 2006
View Source
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:10 PM, C Goodman-Strauss wrote:

>
> Hello, in the Advanced Applied class I'm teaching (aka A First Look at
> Fourier Series Stuff), we are going over solving various physically
> motivated boundary value problems. A problem came up today, describing
> the motion of a rod fixed at one end, given a vigorous twist and
> released. The solution seemed a little weird looking, so I made a GC
> file to take a look. I dunno, does this look realistic?
• Here s a fun variation on the twisty rod file: Simply plot z=A(x,y); this shows, at x,y, the amount twisted at position x along the rod, at time y. However,
Message 1 of 6 , Aug 2, 2006
View Source
Here's a fun variation on the twisty rod file: Simply plot z=A(x,y);
this shows, at x,y, the amount twisted at position x along the rod, at
time y. However, really, for the rod, 0<x<1 and y>0 (shown in red). If
we look at a larger domain, we see that the series sums up to an
egg-carton shape, with square pyramids, up and down, for the dimples.
(Alternatively, this could be seen as the top of a layer of packed
rhombic dodecahedra)

As far as I can tell, the edges are actually sharp, at least as the
number N of terms increases. (Even around n=10 or so, they would appear
perfectly sharp, I think, if rendered exactly, but GC is assembling the
picture out of little squares)
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
• Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
• Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer. We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.