Hi, I know we can read GHC thoughts re these, but I'd love to hear what
YOU think GHC argues against them. i.e. not to quote GHC, but your
impression and understanding. Also any of your impression on what John
Robbins may have said.
e.g. cosmological arguments... or any other, be it Aquinas or Aristotles
or Kalaams (Craig).
e.g. ontological argument, e.g. Anselm.
e.g. Transcendental argument, e.g. Bahnsen
Please, post your impression on one or a few: valid, invalid and why,
viciously circular or a pettitio, with false premises xyz, etc.
I am hoping to get raw data about what those who have read GHC
understood him to say.
Many thanks in advance.