On 5/31/2012 12:52 PM, Dennis wrote:
> Seems Chuck thinks he is the "ALL of RF" or something.
And you got that from what that I said?
> And then to
> boot, he states that he isn't qualified to review said paper, but wants
> to question it's merit???
And where did I say I wasn't qualified?
> He definitely DOES NOT speak for me at all.
And where did I say I was speaking for someone else?
> Besides, the bickering over this needs to stop or be taken off board.
I would agree, but I'm also interested in what's so different about this
paper. A simple, "I'm not ready to say at this time" would have been
Chuck - N8DNX