http://www.greaterthings.com/News/FreeEnergy/Directory/Howard_Johnson_Motor/Douglas_Mann/ or try http://tinyurl.com/ghfo ... You are here: GreaterThings.comJul 9, 2003 1 of 2View Sourceor try http://tinyurl.com/ghfo
You are here: GreaterThings.com > News Directory
Howard Johnson Blueprints to be Published by Douglass Mann
It's time to share this with the world.
First Letter from DougTo: sterlingda@...Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:12 AMSubject: About HJ Motor BlueprintsSterling,Soon I will have the blueprints put on a CD, then I will get them to you. I need to know what format you would like for me to use ( CamCad or ?) ?The plans are shop plans 2feet by 3feet pages, so I can not just scan them at home. I will also add a copy of all the information that I have ,that I have on paper. It may take me a week or so because, part of the blueprints, are at a shop ,that is making a part of a motor. Have you seen Stephen Walkers running HJ Motor? I would like plans for his micro motor? I have asked Tom Bearden to see if the plans that I have are real H Johnson's work, it may take some time for that to happen. The HP output of 50+is my best guest based on the blueprints. The power output is limited on overall scale and magnets power level it calls for 18B... today I can get neo 48+B maybe 55s. The stator magnets are 1"by3/8"by7" I believe that there are 17 stator magnets, there are 6 part ark magnets. The part ark magnets look nothing like anything I have seen on the web.I believe that when most people order magnets for a HJ motor that they get his rail type. I have taken a long time to come to this point with a self education effort in understanding this motor. I learn by doing ,doing, and again. In my mine I can see a picture of how the flux moves as a motor would run. It is a flux switch system, using a magnet superconducting conduit. I would like to know what Stephen Walker did with the shield, and scale the motor up and down.In 1973 I made my first magnet motor. But could not make any thing work. So I felt that I did not know all I needed to know about magnets. So I studied magnet, played with magnet, and keep-ed notes. I used a old TV with a blue screen. When I placed the magnets on to the TV picture tube, I could for the first time see the magnet fields.The blue was, no field the red was north (neg) and yellow was south (pos). I found out that when I made the magnets repelled, the magnet field would go away from the screen. And a poles magnet field did not rotate with the magnet, but stayed fixed in space as the magnet was rotated. But the pole only movement was from pole over pole.And when I attract the magnets the field would combine, and be stronger.So when I was fourteen years old I wrote." That the poles are weaker when repelling, and stronger when attracting, and that this would be like making the magnets go on and off like an electric motor." So years later, when I first saw the plans of the HJ magnet motor about 1987 it hit me hard, that it was real.I understood what I must do, and this Email is part of that hope. In Johnson's papers he talked about a verse in the Bible where the secrets of the snow were being reserved for the days of trouble .The days of trouble are here, this part of doing is a fulfillment, and will happen. So there is no one that can stop it.Douglas A Mann
Reply to DougFrom: Sterling D. AllanTo: Douglas MannSent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:30 AMSubject: Re: About HJ Motor BlueprintsDouglass,I would recommend putting them in both formats on CD so as to be readable by the most number of people.I've not seen an HJ motor running, but I have seen video footage of a related magnetic motor in operation.I'm going to forward your email to Richard. The two of you ought to collaborate.
[...]Sterling D. Allan
Second Letter from DougSent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:12 PMSubject: Re: About HJ Motor BlueprintsSterling D. Allan,Ok , I will put the blueprints in more than one universal system on CD, ASAP.I would like to see a running list file of new properties, or understandings posted. I do not understand how to setup this kind of file system. Maybe a property was observed by some one, smites If cool posted as a new property on its a new properties page. Then other people could test them out, so we all will learn. This should be a group only file.One thing that I like would like for others to look at is the simple electric system.With just a battery, two wires, and a resistance. The text books say that all of the energy is dissipates in to heat as it mover the electrons through the resistance. So all of the energy is conserved as heat. If the resistance were a coil of wire this is still true. And if I use the by product of the moving current , the magnetic field, will not change the heat dissipation of the energy through the resistance. So if the text books are right then it looks to me that the number of electrons are all ways the same in the wires. See if any of the energy from the battery was diverted to do something else, then the number of electrons would fall off as the energy was changed into work out side the system and so a 100% eff system would have no electrons coming back to the battery.( Tesla's one wire system)So look at the CFR as a simple electric system, and the first order of unity is the heat of dissipation; the next is the use of the magnetic field to produce heat. If the people that are working on these types systems should look, and see that the energy has always been; there is no need to have fusion to have over-unity, and that all systems are over-unity.The US Navy made a superconductor electric motor in 1998 as a test. The motor produced about 100 hp at room temp was over 80% eff. But at -320C the motor produced over 340hp with less power input. We should use the FOIA to get this test information. See I believe that at low temp that no electrons are moving in the wires just the potential current, like in magnets, no mass moving ,no dissipation of energy ,no heat. The magnetic field is a product of the potential current, and does not have anything to do with electrons moving. But it is true that if electrons are moving there is a potential current, so a magnetic field also. See its not that the resistance drops with temp, but its that there are less and less electrons to move through the same resistance so the drift speed go up.The so call law of conservation of energy was never tested on electric systems until the CFR was done. The people just believed it was true, and can not believe its not after this test, so they need fusion to cope. The CFR systems offer high temp heat of over-unity, and at 2.78COP it could run the new type Stirling engine generator, and self run. My CFR is a Mercury vapor light in a therm of oil 2.41COP. All electric motors that are made have cooling systems that must cool equal to the electric line input of energy. Let some one test a factory made 90% eff motor and the fact that 100%+ of the electric is lost as heat plus the work output of the magnetic field, so a 90% eff motor has a OU of 1.9+COP.I hope that what I write is to the point, to me it is all about a power full self running motor even if that were an Mercury vapor light inside of a piston engine.
Douglas Allen Mann
Third Letter from DougSent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:07 AMSubject: Re: About HJ Motor BlueprintsHi,Here is part of the HJ motor blueprints. I believe that this came from H Johnson's work in the 1970 to1972 or so. Have you seen this magnet shape before? Johnson's first rotary motor used permanent magnets out of a special DOD electric motor. The maker of the electric motor has destroyed the form that made the magnets after the DOD it did not need them. This information came from a person I know that was trying to reproduce Johnson's work in 1973 time frame. He tried to buy the die from the maker. There is a lot more that I will get to in time, but there is a lot more information that time has already got .The magnets for a rotary motor are not like the magnets for the rail. If you look at the End View , you can see that the tips of the ark magnets are flat with the bar magnets. So rail magnets will not work right on the rotary, also if the edge of the ark magnets are to sharp they can not hold a stable pole location. Most producers of magnets will take short cuts to make money or to lower price to get the sale. I have an Idea for a mass production Ark Magnet System producing 24B field magnets that are with in less than 1/2% of each others field balance. Les Adam of AZ magnets inc died this week. A leader in the promotion of free energy, founder of The Meeting of the Mines.I will send the complete set soon.Douglas Mann
Another Letter from DougSent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:42 AMSubject: Re: permission Re: About HJ Motor BlueprintsSterling,There are many blueprints out there most are not right (disinformation) . I have seen seven blueprint sets, for a motor like the plans that I sent you. And only two of them were perfect to H Johnson's style. I believe that this is H Johnson's work. Most of the bad plans have a round sharped edge ark magnets that I believe were used in H Johnson's rail motor not the Rotory motor. This places the pole face to a right angle to the rotor not at an snowflake's 60 deg angle Ha?Some had stator magnets that had a 2 by 1 profile Johnson used a 3 by 8 ratio on most of the snowflake stuff. By the way both H Johnson and Tom Bearden were DOE , or and DOD retired. H Johnson magnet motor from 1970 then Tom Bearden's MEG unit 1996, and H Johnson and Bearden are friends. H Johnson perfected the ABS braking systems ???LaterDouglas Mann
SPAM BLOCK -- CHALLENGE - RESPONSE
"I use ChoiceMail. New legitimate senders identify themselves. Try it for 14 days."
-- Sterling D. Allan
(On average, I receive 400 trash emails a day; but only the mail I want comes into my inbox)
http://www.greaterthings.com/News/FreeEnergy/Directory/Howard_Johnson_Motor/Douglas_Mann/ or try http://tinyurl.com/ghfo FE Plan Give-Away Howard JohnsonJul 9, 2003 1 of 2View Sourceor try http://tinyurl.com/ghfoFE Plan Give-Away > Howard Johnson Blueprints to be Published by Douglass Mann - It's time to share this with the world.