As a mom to two little proto-princesses, they tend to through a stage where they like pink and they like dressing things, even the one who says she wants toMessage 1 of 17 , Dec 1 8:53 AMView SourceAs a mom to two little proto-princesses, they tend to through a stage where they like pink and they like dressing things, even the one who says she wants to marry the princess and fight the dragon (Mommy, can 2 princesses marry? Yes dear, if they really want to. Good, cause I never want to have kids!).
Princess is not so much rank as being special to my girls. Everyone wants to be special.
Antidotes: The Paper Bag Princess written by Robert Munsch and The Practical Princess by Jay Williams
Both were made into animated shorts that no one has ever heard of...
--- In F-Costume@yahoogroups.com, Cat Devereaux <CatDevereaux@...> wrote:
> What a character does in a costume does not only help form the basic
> costume, but our recreation of it. (How many folks cut down their
> sleeves and trains after taking pics on their LOTR elves... that's
> make-believe and we're wearing them in the real world.)
> >> 'Princess'-centric fairy tales are my big beef with Disney; yes,
> princesses are pretty, but the last one the world had did not LIVE
> happily ever after.
> Totally agree... Guess what. So does Disney. Details here:
> . It says they're closing the book on fairy tales... buffing up the boy
> bit. However, as we see in Tangled, they're still very into selling
> pink and purple to girls, and I have to question how having the boy
> being the charming heart-of-gold thief (reformed or not), makes a better
> roll model for boys.
> Disney is a monster marketing machine and will keep targeting the kids,
> but at least the costumes have more spunk to them.
> While we're talking about the film. Here's a short article, talks about
> the hair and what it took to animate it.
> This movie does look like much fun. With that much activity, should be
> interesting to watch what the animators do with the fabric. While
> saving off the high-rez pictures, I noticed that they're representing
> seams... there's a shot of the guy upside down, legs in "V" that lets
> you check out construction for his trousers. <G> The animators are
> discovering that you do have to pay attention to seams to get clothing
> to move right. They don't always pay attention yet, as we saw by the 3
> versions of the tangled dress, but at least they're getting there.
> For those interested in more on computers and clothing, there's a link
> in our Archive here to an article where the costume designer for Avatar
> talks about taking samples of fabrics and weaving to the animators and
> the issues and back and forth. It's worth looking up if you missed it
> the first time.
quite a rant. I should point out that Diana was not even remotely the last one (princess) the world had . I ve larped and I have indeed seen a frying panMessage 2 of 17 , Dec 1 11:15 AMView Sourcequite a rant. I should point out that Diana was not even remotely the "last one (princess) the world had".
I've larped and I have indeed seen a frying pan boffed up. Good ideas, all!
No, she wasn t. Nor was she a princess in her own right. ... quite a rant. I should point out that Diana was not even remotely the last one (princess) theMessage 1 of 17 , Dec 1 1:09 PMView SourceNo, she wasn't. Nor was she a princess in her own right.
--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Darka <janeravenswood@...> wrote:
quite a rant. I should point out that Diana was not even remotely the "last one (princess) the world had".
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
... Yeah, I thought that part of the rant was a bit odd. There are other countries with royalty. Besides, we have a princess story happening right now —KateMessage 1 of 17 , Dec 1 7:02 PMView SourceOn Dec 1, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Elizabeth Phillips wrote:
> No, she wasn't. Nor was she a princess in her own right.Yeah, I thought that part of the rant was a bit odd. There are other
> --- On Wed, 12/1/10, Darka <janeravenswood@...> wrote:
> quite a rant. I should point out that Diana was not even remotely
> the "last one (princess) the world had".
countries with royalty. Besides, we have a princess story happening
right now —Kate Middleton has been working for a while and is not
getting married as a teenager. And engaged to someone her own age!
I agree it's a phase for most girls. We used to describe a friend's
daughter as half princess, half monkey. She could often be found
swinging from a jungle gym in a princess dress-up gown. Now that
she's a teenager, she is neither.
Little girl princesses are exactly who the characters are for. The
later the movie, the more the young woman does things for herself
instead of waiting to be rescued. Rapunzel could wield a frying pan,
and was quite skilled with her hair. Mulan was a soldier. It's
simpler than what the article says. Movies with female leads are
watched by women and girls. Movies with male leads are watched by
Oh well, on to the costumes — I went to see it today and, having read
the posts, I could see what was mentioned. Some details changing,
working toward more realism but not quite there yet. The thing that
struck me as funny was that the embroidery looked like it was based
on machine embroidery rather than hand work. I liked the brocade
texture of the stepmother's dress.