... Ah, well... I see. For example (your example of 24v device), using a 30v zener, any voltages over 30 will be conducted through the zener and not the deviceMessage 1 of 31 , Apr 11View SourceOn Apr 11, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Terrance wrote:
> Did I explain that well?Ah, well...
I see. For example (your example of 24v device), using a 30v zener, any voltages over 30 will be conducted through the zener and not the device (ie, FET). And reverse voltages above 0.7v(?) are conducted through the zener.
Did I get that right?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Drivers, yes ok, or protected drivers. But is that not the device of choice for driving high power solenoids? Or do people use bare FETs or Transistors?Message 31 of 31 , Apr 26View SourceDrivers, yes ok, or protected drivers. But is that not the device of choice for driving high power solenoids? Or do people use "bare" FETs or Transistors? Wasnt that the original poster's question.
--- In Electronics_101@yahoogroups.com, Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@...> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Michael <mmk_tsm@...> wrote:
> > Jan,
> > there are a whole range of devices out there with many protection
> > features built in - see below for NCV8402. I havent used anything myself
> > with current handling up to 2A. I have used 8 channel devices with
> > protection, i.e. ST's VN808's, for smaller solenoids, it is rated to 0.7A.
> > And is excellent - pity package is so ackward.
> Ah. I call those devices "drivers", because that's how they are listed on
> DigiKey and most manufacturers' websites.
> > NCV8402 is a two channel, three terminal protected Low-Side Smart Discrete
> > device. The protection features include overcurrent, overtemperature, ESD
> > and integrated Drain-to-Gate clamping for overvoltage protection. This
> > device offers protection and is suitable for harsh automotive environments.
> Nice chip. It should work fine in this application (2A solenoid driver)
> and would protect itself from short circuits in the load. A diode across
> the solenoid is still recommended, because of the 150 mJ max Single Pulse
> Avalanche Energy spec.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]