Thank you Jeff.. That s good info to keep on had. BillMessage 1 of 23 , Nov 16, 2012View SourceThank you Jeff.. That's good info to keep on had.
> 1.0x10-5 (or better) is good benchmark to look for on the RX BER at –50
> dBm test and the TX "BER at 12-dB SINAD+30 dB" test. If a radio can't
> perform well at those levels then good luck with it on the 9.6k airwaves.
That was with a Kantronics KPC-9612 and on a Timewave DSP-232USB. Rick/n9umj Sent from my iPhoneMessage 1 of 23 , Nov 16, 2012View SourceThat was with a Kantronics KPC-9612 and on a Timewave DSP-232USB.Rick/n9umj
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...> wrote:
> I agree totally, I've had the Dr235t in operation for a year and found its
> performance on 9.6k nominal and unreliable as a backbone,
> During heavy use the dr235t will distort the packets to the points they
> cannot be decoded even at short distances.
Is that with the built in 9k6 TNC or a "good" external TNC like the PK96?
Bill - WA7NWP