Baty's "Goliath" has already been proven logically invalid. Regardless of Robert Baty's claims-evidence doesn't speak. It must be interpreted. Baty has been unable to show us that there is a possibility that there is evidence which speaks. The Goliath has been proven invalid. Mark just wanted to prove Robert Baty will run from debates at the same step. Mark was able to do that
I'll continue waiting in hopes that "Mark" might escape the clutches of "Leon"
and provide the legitimate lead for me to follow and so produce an analysis of
"Mark's" "Stone" argument and its relevance, if any, to my "Goliath of GRAS" and
the claims I have made for it.