> I'd be interested to hear whether
> others who have seen the book agree with this review:
As mentioned in Katrin's Togs from Bogs review, and Adelisa pointed out too, it depends what time period you are interested in.
From what I remember reading, it was very strongly focused on early modern and modern evidence, and is really disappointing if you're interested in time periods before 1500 or so. And organised in a chronological sequence instead of a more precise item type.
I did like the chapter on thimbles, (mostly because it mentions Viking-age stuff, which is where my interest lies) although it would have been much better to have illustrations or even line drawings showing the differences in shapes and design that she mentions in the text.
As mentioned by Katrin, the way items are grouped together is far too broad. Big, decorative cloak pins mixed in with petite 'dress' pins, (or at least, that's what seems to be happening. See for example page 12 in the preview below. She jumps from Elizabethan 'skewers' to 14-15th century pins, and I don't think it's clear she is probably referring to finer, dress pins there.)
I suspect it's a problem of viewpoint-- we might see the difference between a veil pin and a cloak pin because we wear them, and have to dress ourselves with these items. If they're just all 'pins' then the chronological narrative matters more than the fact they are pins for different uses.
If people want to make up their own minds, GoogleBooks has a preview version that should give you a rough idea: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=rvT_aYLCKfIC
It is a handy book if it's in a nearby library and you want to flick through it, but I wouldn't spend the money on it for myself.
(who is an early period/Viking age sort of person, so will probably have a different view to people with later-period interests.)