Thanks probably did trying all sorts of groups to get help! Ive since checked the lead and its wired up correctly. One thing thats different from my setup toMessage 1 of 11 , Jul 1, 2006View SourceThanks probably did trying all sorts of groups to get help! Ive since checked the lead and its wired up correctly. One thing thats different from my setup to most is that C: is not my windows drive - everything is installed on D: - and ive not been able to find the log files that should be produced. I'll be getting a laptop shortly which will help be eliminate the PC end of things.
From: ASCOM-Talk@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ASCOM-Talk@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Rowland
Sent: 30 June 2006 08:55
Subject: Re: [ASCOM] AScom driver for Celestron Advanced Series C11 SCT
>the Celestron Advanced
> Ive been trying to gtet the ascom driver for
> series C11 SCT to work with a variety ofsoftware but cant establish
> communications, both on a dedicated serialport and a usb virtual port.
> Both setup correctly. Noticed a referenceon
> needed. I'm using an old style hand nonflasheable controller v3.04 is
> this the causeof my problems?No it isn't. The driver will communicate will all Celestron hand control
versions. The exact functionality will vary depending on the HC type and
version but it will communicate.
The most likely reason for communication problems are the connection
between the PC and the scope.
The cable has to be wired correctly.
The cable must be connected to the correct port on the scope, this is
the one on the base of the HC.
There is a similar cable available for Meads scopes, it will plug in but
is connected differently and won't work.
> ie does the Handcontroller have to be 4.0 onwards?
Didn't we have this conversation on the AS group?
... Thanks to all for responding. A clarification...When I use the telescope api for the Sky and then select ACP Hub as the driver isn t this using the meadeMessage 1 of 11 , Jul 3, 2006View Source--- In ASCOM-Talk@yahoogroups.com, "autostaretx" <rseymour@...> wrote:
>Thanks to all for responding. A clarification...When I use the
> --- In ASCOM-Talk@yahoogroups.com, Bob Denny <rdenny@> wrote:
> > jjonske:
> > > So why would the motion controls in ACP, Maxim, or The Sky
> > > 6...Maxim centering calibration routine...all move the scope
> > > in the same direction no matter what is selected while the
> > > goto's would work properly?
> > (2) TheSky has within it specific code for each telescope it
> > supports; it does not use standard drivers but it's own
> > (different and independently developed) driver code.
> ?? So TheSky (i don't have it) is -not- an ASCOM-client?
> (just seeking claification, so future questions can be sent there)
> > (3) Both MaxIm and ACP use simple slew commands for nudging.
> May i request reserving the phrase "simple slew" to the use
> of the :Ms# :Mw# :Me# and :Mn# commands?
> For the case in point, it would be clearer if you said
> "simple (or standard) GoTo commands"
> > They compute the new RA/Dec and tell the scope (via the driver)
> > to slew to that new location. In other words, there is no
> > separate nudge command offered by the driver, thus those two
> > programs do exactly the same thing for short slews
> > (nudges) and long slews, "slew to this RA/Dec" without
> > distinguishing between a "short" (nudge) slew and a "long" slew.
> > Taking all three of these facts together excludes software from
> > the cause.
> For me, the final note is the key.
> > Now I'll take guess: Your RA backlash settings in the LX200GPS
> > are too high... the scope is moving "too far" west first in an
> > effort to allow the scope to converge on the final coordinates
> > with the worm against the ring.
> Given that it's using a GoTo for the nudge, i'd be more prone
> to suspect that either:
> (a) the scope's alignment (Autostar's idea of where RA/DEC -is-)
> is a bit off, so the "nudge"-directed GoTo simply is GoTo'ing
> the "wrong spot" (from the user's perspective). If that spot
> is (for example) to the "left" of the desired target, then the
> scope would always appear to be "nudging" to the left.
> This could also happen if the program and the telescope differed
> in their idea of where a certain RA/DEC were, too.
> (b) Meade appears to have added an "arrive from the east moving
> west" tweak to the LX200gps... (to avoid anti=backlash effects
> by trying to overcome them with larger slews) so that will cause
> the nudge to always start with a (relatively) large eastward motion,
> followed by the westward motion to the final destination.
> If the user's "Train Drive" results were too low, the scope could
> end up falling east of the target. If they were too large, it
> might end up too far west. Note that these are the Train Drive
> results (not handbox-visible/directly accessible without my patch
> kit), -not- the Anti-Backlash percentages. (the Train Drive
> results are what the Anti-Backlash percentages are percentages -of-.)
> Thanks for claifying "nudge".
> have fun
telescope api for the Sky and then select ACP Hub as the driver isn't
this using the meade ascom driver? I re-trained my drive prior to my
last session when the problem started. Maybe if I re-train again this
will correct the problem. I don't believe I set the ra backlash
setting but I'll take a look. Thanks again...