... performing ... justify their contracts, ... do not ... players like ... howard in ... Actually, I think the difference is at the other end of the pay scaleMessage 1 of 57 , Aug 1, 2004View Source
> accordingly you have to wonder if it really is true that some poorperforming
> players continue to get major playing time solely because they havejustify their contracts,
> outrageously huge contracts, i.e. they are given major PT to
> at a cost of wins to their teams, or is it just that teams simplydo not
> realize how poor performing these players are? examples would beplayers like
> antoine walker in dallas, clifford robinson in golden state, juwanhoward in
> orlando, and others....Actually, I think the difference is at the other end of the pay
scale -- more teams are realizing the value of using the nuclear
option as a cap management tool. The 02-03 Nuggets were a perfect
example. Junior Harrington and Vincent Yarbrough had to be the worst
backcourt in history -- neither was even in the league a year ago.
But Denver stuck with it rather than pay for somebody good because
they weren't trying to win.
... Hash: SHA1 ... No, this is wrong. It s wrong because it favours bench players. Guys like Bowen and Artest (and especially Bowen, because he s older)Message 57 of 57 , Aug 5, 2004View Source-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 smckibbi@... wrote:
> Great idea. Perhaps the criteria for deciding which swingman is guarding who
> would be the team's overall def points per 100 possessions when the swingman
> is on the court. The one with the lower pts/100 poss is guarding the better
> offensive player.
No, this is wrong. It's wrong because it favours bench players. Guys like
Bowen and Artest (and especially Bowen, because he's older) usually don't
guard the opposing bench's best player; they take a rest when the other
side's coach brings his bench players onto the floor.
You get a guy like Peterson on the Raptors, he's usually on the floor when
the other side's bench is, and usually not when their starters are. Now,
he's a good defender, but his stats are going to get enhanced under this
Here's a Modest Proposal: Track the overall offensive production per
minute or possession of the opposing team's players that a particular
player defends. Compare that to their offensive production per minute or
possession while he's on the floor. A negative result means a good
defender, a positive result means a bad one, zero means average.
GnuPG public key available from
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----