great suggestions ... should be a ... planted when the ... ballcarrier ... go one step ... on offense ... ref that the ... flagrant - 2 ... game, because 2 ...
Message 1 of 6
, Jun 22, 2004
--- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, bchaikin@a... wrote:
> I think the refs hold the key: moving in front of a ballhandler
should be a
> defensive foul. It shouldn't matter whether the defender is
planted when the
> offender gets there. It should only be an offensive foul when the
> makes his move after the defender is planted.
> absolutely - i wholeheartedly concur. as a matter of fact i would
go one step
> further, and state that anytime a defender fouls a player who is
> (with the ball) where its clear to - and in the opinion of - the
ref that the
> defender made no attempt to go for the ball that it should be a
flagrant - 2
> FTAs then possession of the ball. this would IMHO speed up the
game, because 2
> flagrants and a defender is out of the game, and we'd see alot
less fouling for
> the sake of fouling or intimidation...
> that and calling flagrants on obvious overly hard fouls would help
> bob chaikin
Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
Changes have not been saved
Press OK to abandon changes or Cancel to continue editing
Your browser is not supported
Kindly note that Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions of Internet Explorer.
We recommend upgrading to the latest Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later, make sure you turn off Compatibility View.