... believe ... The fact remains, that the Boston coach gives Walker 40 minutes every night, so he apparently doesn t consider him pitiful . As for assigningMessage 1 of 64 , May 11, 2003View Source--- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "aaronkoo" <deano@r...> wrote:
> Given the common perception that Walker is awesome (I can'tbelieve
> so many Boston fans think he's better than Pierce), I realize thatThe fact remains, that the Boston coach gives Walker 40 minutes
> there is quite a burden on me to show that he's not so good.
every night, so he apparently doesn't consider him 'pitiful'.
As for assigning losses to basketball players, you probably know I
think that's a sack of doodoo, and destined for the ashcan of
If Walker has 'lost' 15 games for Boston this year; and lacking
Walker 'even worse players' would have lost even more games, then it
seems the assigning of losses cannot appropriately be done for
individuals, but only for teams.
In other words, individual won-loss records for basketball are at
least as impractical a player-rating method as it is for pitchers in
> Not myWalker
> highest priority right now. I've just never seen a case like
> before.I don't have any numbers here, but I do have my Euclidean player-
comparison sheet. Shooting pct. is included only as a scaling
adjustment to scoring rate.
sim player . . sco reb ast
.00 Antoine Walker 20 9 4
.32 Marques Johnson 20 8 4
.33 George McGinnis 19 10 4
.39 Shareef AbdurRahim 21 9 3
.42 Brad Daugherty 20 10 4
.45 Billy Cunningham 20 9 4
.47 Mickey Johnson 17 9 4
.48 Sidney Wicks 17 9 3
.49 Bob Dandridge 19 6 3
.50 Juwan Howard 18 8 3
.50 Christian Laettner 17 9 3
.52 Detlef Schrempf 17 8 4
.52 Alvan Adams 17 9 5
steals and blocks are included, but omitted for clarity
I was forced to watch a huge number of Hawks games this year. One thing nobody talked about was how bad this team s bench was. Nazr Mohammed just flat outMessage 64 of 64 , May 22, 2003View SourceI was forced to watch a huge number of Hawks games this year. One
thing nobody talked about was how bad this team's bench was. Nazr
Mohammed just flat out sucked, and Alan Henderson wasn't much better.
Darvin Ham can't make a shot if it isn't a dunk, and Dan Dickau was a
total flop. The only halfway decent bench player was Ira Newble, and
he started half the season.
As for the Terry point/not a point issue, the real problem was that
he was the only guy who could handle the ball, especially when Newble
was starting at off guard, and that was why they made so many TOs.
The Hawks just need somebody else who can dribble and take the
pressure off; which guard spot he plays is almost irrelevant.
As for Big Dog, he should be a bench dog. The team played better
without him, and at this point Newble is better anyway.
--- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "lilnemoinslumber"
> --- In APBR_analysis@yahoogroups.com, "aaronkoo" <deano@r...> wrote:them?
> > 4. There are some good pieces in Atlanta. What to do to fix
> Take the ball out of Terry, Robinson, and Rahim's hands.
> Atlanta's "Big Three" are averaging a Big 3 TO's apiece.
> The Big Question is who exactly will be at the helm? Do they keep
> Stotts? Do they go after a Big guard to play point and keep Terry
> the 2? Do they undergo a Big overhaul in their offensive schemes tois
> try and eliminate the TO inducing iso's? Or do they punt?
> One at a time:
> We can't divine who will end up as coach, but we'll assume Stotts
> staying on. He brought the Hawks a bit of cohesion as their secondbe
> half finish can attest.
> I like the idea of a big guard playing point to Terry's 2. But it
> seems most tall ball-handling guards either look to score for
> themselves or are too easily harassed by quicker, smaller guards.
> Admittedly, getting Glenn to play D, or Theo to stay healthy would
> the answer. But playing better team D, and cutting down onturnovers
> really ought to be enough to get this crew into the playoffs. Inthe
> east at least.