At first glance, this thing has more holes in it than a cullander.
Moving past ranking Kirilenko ahead of Shaq, they say Tim Duncan was
****14 points better**** per game than the league average; basically,
that means the Spurs would have won what, maybe twelve games if
Duncan hadn't played? Does that sound right?
My favorite line was, "He acquired Evan Eschmeyer, Tim Hardaway and
Danny Manning, all of whom had rated highly the previous season.." I
bet Cuban's really glad he relied on the software to make THOSE
--- In APBR_analysis@y..., "HoopStudies" <deano@r...> wrote:
> In case you're not on the APBR list, HoosierHysteria posted this
> It's all about a piece of software that does a lot of what we'd
> to do to estimate value. I have some serious questions about what
> they're doing.