Has anyone experienced issues keying their radio on modes other than JT9-1? I'm
using a Kenwood TS-480HX here in FL and mode 1 workes just fine. Mode 2 keys the
transmitter immediately and won't release. Higher modes will not key the
transmitter at all.

This is using the same settings (other than the mode) that works just fine with
Mode 1.

Any feedback?

Larry
W8LIG

Hi Larry,

I have been trying to draw attention to this problem for at least a month now.
So in a way I am glad you experience this as well.

The fact that many are using audio driven ( VOX ) T/R switching makes that not
many WSJTx And WSPRx ( sane problem ) users are aware
of this problem.

I have contacted K1JT twice about it, but the answer is that at K1JT is seems to
be working.

I have been contacting others of which I know they are not using audio driven
T/R switching and gotten the same reports as you give.

At my station I have tried it on 3 different computers and 2 laptops and in all
cases the same behavior. All WINXP SP3 machines

It might help if you report the problem to K1JT, I do not seem to have the
credibility in reporting the problem.

Bottom line is JT9-1 and 2 work fine, JT9-5 and longer does not switch the com
port , audio generation ( tiones ) is fine

WSPRx-2 working WSPRx-15 same problem with com port switching and audio working
as it should.

73 Rein W6SZ







-----Original Message-----
>From: w8lig <larry@...>
>Sent: Feb 15, 2013 1:14 AM
>To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [wsjtgroup] Question to the Group on WSJTx
>
>Has anyone experienced issues keying their radio on modes other than JT9-1? I'm
using a Kenwood TS-480HX here in FL and mode 1 workes just fine. Mode 2 keys the
transmitter immediately and won't release. Higher modes will not key the
transmitter at all.
>
>This is using the same settings (other than the mode) that works just fine with
Mode 1.
>
>Any feedback?
>
>Larry
>W8LIG
>
>
T
>------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>wsjtgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>WSJTGroup HomePage http://www.meteorscatter.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

I agree. Look forward to a JT9-1 QSO with you soon, Mack; yesterday I decoded
your CQ.

As a former JT65-HF user may I make a couple of suggestions?

1. Double-clicking anywhere on a decode line should put the DX callsign into DX
Call. At present you have to click on the call, clicking anywhere else puts
whatever you clicked on into that box, even if it isn't a call. I've got my own
call in there and have ended up replying to myself! I've seen others make the
same mistake too.

2. Double-clicking on a decode line should set the TX frequency to match the
frequency of that transmission. If you increase TOL to a larger value, say 200,
you can have multiple decodes in a period. You then have to enter that call into
the box and also click on the Wide Graph window to set the TX frequency, and you
can easily click on the wrong trace in your hurry to do it before the clock
reaches 0.

This behaviour is what JT65-HF did and I believe that it would make WSJTX easier
to use.

Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: http://www.g4ilo.com/

--- In wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com, mack edmonson <mackedmonson@...> wrote:
>
> To all who are currently using JT65HF:  Please check out the WSJTX modes on
the HF bands. WSJTX does "EVERYTHING" that JT65HF does with only 20 hertz of
bandwidth, that means that 5 qso's can be carried on in the same bandwidth as 1
qso using JT65HF. Power levels can be reduced and signals are easily  decoded at
-25 db levels.
> If you have not done so, please check out this mode, lots of fun.
> Mack
> W4ENN
>

wsjt 9.3.r2792 update is available for debian & ubuntu linux:

debian download (near the bottom of the page):
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/hamradio/wsjt

ubuntu versions 12.04, 12.10, 13.04:
https://launchpad.net/~jnogatch/+archive/wsjt9


The older package wsjt 5.9.7.r383 had several problems, e.g. it would show a
window briefly and then crash:
     Audio.gcom2.hiscall=(ToRadio.get()+'            ')[:12]
ValueError: could not convert string to float: W8WN


Getting the packaging correct is not easy. Kamal KA6MAL provided much expert
help. We hope this helps other linux users to run wsjt.

- John AC6SL

Den 12-02-2013 16:46, jnogatch skrev:
> wsjt 9.3.r2792 update is available for debian & ubuntu linux:
>
> debian download (near the bottom of the page):
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/hamradio/wsjt
>
> ubuntu versions 12.04, 12.10, 13.04:
> https://launchpad.net/~jnogatch/+archive/wsjt9
>
>
> The older package wsjt 5.9.7.r383 had several problems, e.g. it would show a
window briefly and then crash:
>      Audio.gcom2.hiscall=(ToRadio.get()+'            ')[:12]
> ValueError: could not convert string to float: W8WN
>
>
> Getting the packaging correct is not easy. Kamal KA6MAL provided much expert
help. We hope this helps other linux users to run wsjt.
>
> - John AC6SL
Thank you very much John (and Kamal), have been waiting for this for a
long time indeed - (and having had to resort to running the Win versions
under Wine for the past year or so) - now if we could only get WSJTX and
especially WSPR also?

--
Vy 73 de OZ1PIF/5Q2M, Peter

*****************************************
** Women and cats will do as they      **
** please, and men and dogs should     **
** relax and get used to the idea.     **
**            -- Robert A. Heinlein    **
*****************************************
email: peter(no-spam filler)@frenning.dk
http://www.frenning.dk/oz1pif.htm
Ph. +45 4619 3239/ +45 2332 9464
Snailmail:
Peter Frenning
Ternevej 23
DK-4130 Viby Sj.
Denmark
*****************************************

I an running WSJT 9.3 r2792 under Lubuntu 12.10.  It has suddenly stopped
running.  When I attempt to start it I get the error message in the subject
line.  Any suggestions as to how I might get it running again would be
appreciated.

Jim, we2s

I sent in my Log..only 9 Q's in 7 Grids..I am sure was 'All MS using
WSJT' !  Just popped in occasionally to help out a few of the guys with
my Grid, and I was 'Spotting them and using the Logger's myself as well' !
I sent it in as a 'Check Log' Only.. but using the Logger's/Spotting put
me into the Multi-Multi Op Category I guess..  just Rx a 'Really Nice
Certificate' for 1st Place with a 'Division Winner' Stamp on it as well
!   63 points ?
One of the Nicest Certificates I have ever Rx as well !  Nice Job on
their part !
ARRL could of saved the postage/certificate for someone 'more deserving'
I think ! :-)
"Send In Those Logs" anyway.. ya Never Know !  73
Jerry
VE6CPP
DN39or

http://www.arrl.org/results-database?event_id=33440&ofst=225&ofst=350&ofst=725&o\
fst=700

I don't feel quite so bad now.. KF6I Won Division with 18 points ! ;-)

Multioperator (MO)
Atlantic N3NGE 535,050
Central W9RVG 8,610
Delta N4JQQ 22,750
Great Lakes W8RU 3,686
Hudson KC2SST 1,456
Midwest NØGZ 14,268
New England N1JEZ 40,479
Northwestern KE7SW 450
Pacific W6YX 6,240
Roanoke N4PD 3,080
Rocky Mountain WØRIC 1,924
Southeastern N4QV 29,488
Southwestern KF6I 18
West Gulf K5QE 812,224
Canada VE6CPP 63

On 2/20/2013 12:40 PM, Jerry wrote:
> I sent in my Log..only 9 Q's in 7 Grids..I am sure was 'All MS using
> WSJT' !  Just popped in occasionally to help out a few of the guys
> with my Grid, and I was 'Spotting them and using the Logger's myself
> as well' !
> I sent it in as a 'Check Log' Only.. but using the Logger's/Spotting
> put me into the Multi-Multi Op Category I guess..  just Rx a 'Really
> Nice Certificate' for 1st Place with a 'Division Winner' Stamp on it
> as well !   63 points ?
> One of the Nicest Certificates I have ever Rx as well !  Nice Job on
> their part !
> ARRL could of saved the postage/certificate for someone 'more
> deserving' I think ! :-)
> "Send In Those Logs" anyway.. ya Never Know !  73
> Jerry
> VE6CPP
> DN39or
>
>
http://www.arrl.org/results-database?event_id=33440&ofst=225&ofst=350&ofst=725&o\
fst=700
>

It seems the ARRL is digging in its heels and refusing to recognize JT-9 as a
acceptable mode. I have made several JT-9 contacts and would like LotW to at
least admit I had the QSO.

I have created a script to alter the mode from JT-9 to "data" before submitting
them to LotW but I have had many of them kicked back as "No Match".

So, what are we supposed to submit a JT-9 contact as?

Fred - KK5AA
EM25xh

Hi Mack,

I don't think you are doing anything wrong.

I have found a few other users of JT9-5 and above as well as WSPR-x - 15 having
the same problem.

As a matter of fact I have the problem here as well.

Amateurs, able to use it,  are all using some form of audio activated T/R
switching. ( Rig blasters, etc ) and
no straight RS-232 activation. As far as I  have found at least.

It is only the com port, the generation audio is working fine. Hope this helps.

73 Rein W6SZ



-----Original Message-----
>From: mack edmonson <mackedmonson@...>
>Sent: Feb 26, 2013 10:56 PM
>To: "wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com" <wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [wsjtgroup] (unknown)
>
>What is the trick to get WSJT-X  9-5, 9-10 and 9-30 to key the transmitter?
 9-1 and 9-2 work fine. What did I do wrong?  Software says it is transmitting
but does not key transmitter. COM 1 is selected port.
>
>Mack 
>W4ENN

Hello All,


I am just wondering whether this problem is the or a reason why JT9 is slow in
being used by the WSJT community?
It is really hard to find users outside a small group so far, while the mode is
excellent, in mu=y opinion at least.

73 Rein W6SZ


-----Original Message-----
>From: Ed Wilson <ed.wilson@...>
>Sent: Feb 26, 2013 6:48 PM
>To: kk5aa_fred <poppafred@...>, "wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com"
<wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [wsjtgroup] JT-9 and LotW
>
>Fred,
>
>I use HRD Log and use the Modes Edit menu to upload as an ADIF of type DATA and
have never had a JT9 contact bounced back. I believe that you can also edit the
.TQ8 (I believe that is the LOTW file on your local PC) to translate JT9 to
DATA. If you are using another logging program, it might have similar
capabilities. I spoke with the head LOTW guru at ARRL HQ a few months ago and I
would not hold your breath on getting LOTW to recognize JT9. I have received a
number of matches using DATA for my approximately 120 JT9 contacts.
>
>Ed, K0KC
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: kk5aa_fred <poppafred@...>
>To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:31 PM
>Subject: [wsjtgroup] JT-9 and LotW
>
>
> 
>It seems the ARRL is digging in its heels and refusing to recognize JT-9 as a
acceptable mode. I have made several JT-9 contacts and would like LotW to at
least admit I had the QSO.
>
>I have created a script to alter the mode from JT-9 to "data" before submitting
them to LotW but I have had many of them kicked back as "No Match".
>
>So, what are we supposed to submit a JT-9 contact as?
>
>Fred - KK5AA
>EM25xh
>
>
>

Hi all,

I have a couple weeks ago i downloaded wsjt on my mac book pro, receiving works
fine.
But transmitting is just an problem.
There is no out going transmit signal from my mac book to my Microham usb
interface 3.
Is out here anyone who have experiance with this configuration, and will tell me
the settings for this problem?

73 Andre ph5c

Joe has released a new version of WSJT-X today.

Hi all

I am calling cq now on 474.200 plus 1350 tone TX 2en now.
Try to catch me !

New ver of WSJT-X   (v0.5, r3038)

http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html


LA5VNA Steinar
loc:JO59jq

Hi All,

Do not know what is going on with JT9-1 activity today, some publication or
conditions?

I had the receiver running with a 500 Hz Tol window this morning
and logged the following stations:
Ki1J
IK3SCB
G6WZA
GM3NZX
W4SR
UA1NAN
RA3TAT
W6NT
F8RZ
WB4KDI
OK2EA
EA3AQS
DJ9GS
LY2CV
K7SWW
UU9JQ
RA9XQ
KC2RDC
N2LQ
G4ILO
WB2HTO
WU9Q
M0TXS
KF7JQF

About 15:00 to 17:00 UTC recorded calls ( perhaps some typo's )

Looks a lot like 14076 with WSJT65A-RF!

Quite nice. I have seen and worked a number of these stations
but so far never seen the density!

73 Rein W6SZ
DM14ed

Hello Ed,

At 14078 kHz ( 20 m ) Most JT9-1 bands are 2 kHz above the WSJT frequencies. (
xx.076 kHz  )
1839.5 for 160 m
Activity is from 160 m up to 10 m.

73 Rein W6SZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: Ed <k7aat.ed@...>
>Sent: Mar 8, 2013 7:44 PM
>To: 'Rein A' <rein0zn@...>, wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>
>You had your receiver running where ?????
>
>
>
>I am new to this mode and don't know where all the activity is taking
>place.. Bands and specific frequencies????
>
>
>
>Ed  K7AAT
>
>
>
>
>
>From: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
>Of Rein A
>Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:33 AM
>To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>Do not know what is going on with JT9-1 activity today, some publication or
>conditions?
>
>I had the receiver running with a 500 Hz Tol window this morning
>and logged the following stations:
>

Aha, that explain why I was not able to copy anything on 076 ;)

LA5VNA Steinar
loc:JO59jq


Den 08.03.2013 20:59, skrev rein0zn@...:
> Hello Ed,
>
> At 14078 kHz ( 20 m ) Most JT9-1 bands are 2 kHz above the WSJT frequencies. (
xx.076 kHz  )
> 1839.5 for 160 m
> Activity is from 160 m up to 10 m.
>
> 73 Rein W6SZ
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ed <k7aat.ed@...>
>> Sent: Mar 8, 2013 7:44 PM
>> To: 'Rein A' <rein0zn@...>, wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: RE: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>>
>> You had your receiver running where ?????
>>
>>
>>
>> I am new to this mode and don't know where all the activity is taking
>> place.. Bands and specific frequencies????
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed  K7AAT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Rein A
>> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:33 AM
>> To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Do not know what is going on with JT9-1 activity today, some publication or
>> conditions?
>>
>> I had the receiver running with a 500 Hz Tol window this morning
>> and logged the following stations:
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> wsjtgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> WSJTGroup HomePage http://www.meteorscatter.org/
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

Steinar,

Now that I am at it, there is another problem.

Going back to WSJT becoming popular, there was the JT-logger:

   http://www.chris.org/cgi-bin/jt65talk   (1)

This site played a big roll ( all in my opinion ) in scheduling, experimenting,
assisting, etc with HF WSJT.

I learned about WSJT on HF because I often visited the EME site:

   http://www.chris.org/cgi-bin/jt65emeA (2)

asking myself waht are they talking about?

Due to the lack of HF users , (1) has become like an overflow site for ( 2 )
95%  EME related converations.

There is also K3UK's site of course but it is not that well known:

   http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/index.php?board=digitalradio

Through the day there is a fair amount of JT9 related traffic going on there.

Also testing, reporting and helping.

Hope this will help

73 Rein W6SZ



-----Original Message-----
>From: Steinar Aanesland <saanes@...>
>Sent: Mar 8, 2013 8:05 PM
>To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>
>Aha, that explain why I was not able to copy anything on 076 ;)
>
>LA5VNA Steinar
>loc:JO59jq
>
>
>Den 08.03.2013 20:59, skrev rein0zn@...:
>> Hello Ed,
>>
>> At 14078 kHz ( 20 m ) Most JT9-1 bands are 2 kHz above the WSJT frequencies.
( xx.076 kHz  )
>> 1839.5 for 160 m
>> Activity is from 160 m up to 10 m.
>>
>> 73 Rein W6SZ
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ed <k7aat.ed@...>
>>> Sent: Mar 8, 2013 7:44 PM
>>> To: 'Rein A' <rein0zn@...>, wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: RE: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>>>
>>> You had your receiver running where ?????
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am new to this mode and don't know where all the activity is taking
>>> place.. Bands and specific frequencies????
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ed  K7AAT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
>>> Of Rein A
>>> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:33 AM
>>> To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: [wsjtgroup] JT9-1 this morning in California
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Do not know what is going on with JT9-1 activity today, some publication or
>>> conditions?
>>>
>>> I had the receiver running with a 500 Hz Tol window this morning
>>> and logged the following stations:
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>> wsjtgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>>
>> WSJTGroup HomePage http://www.meteorscatter.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>wsjtgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>WSJTGroup HomePage http://www.meteorscatter.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Anyone is trying new wsjt-x program in Linux?

I have compiled it on my Ubuntu 12.04 but I have some trouble with sound
devices. No devices in setup window and, forcing a device number in wsjt.ini, I
get core dump due to Input overflow

Regards
Franco Spinelli
IW2DHW