Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

usshipsoftheline · United States Ships of the Line

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 157
  • Category: Maritime History
  • Founded: Mar 13, 2006
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 94 - 124 of 187   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#94 From: usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed Nov 1, 2006 10:00 am
Subject: File - US Ships of the Line and locations in 1861
usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
United States Official Register 1861

Navy Ships of the Line

NAME    GUNS     TONS    BUILT      YEAR    SITUATION            LOCATION 1861

Ohio     84      2,757  Brooklyn   1820  In commission Receiving Ship, Boston

North Carolina 84 2,633 Philadelphia 1820   do    Rec'ving Ship      New York

Vermont  84      2,633  Charlestown  1848    In ordinary              Boston

New Orleans  84  2,805 Sackett's Harbor 1815 On the stocks      Sackett's Harbor

Alabama   84     2,633 Kittery        1818         do                  Kittery

Virginia  84     2,633 Charlestown    1818         do                   Boston

#95 From: "cokerre" <cokerre@...>
Date: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:39 pm
Subject: Ship of the Line Pennsylvania
cokerre
Send Email Send Email
 
I have added to the photos of the Pennsylvania a paiting by Butterworth
showing the ship probably entering the Chesapeake upon her arrival from
Philadelphia. If anyone can identify the light house in left side of
the painting, please let me know.
This painting will be offered at Christie's Maritime Auction in New
York on January 31. To see it and the other offerings go to
Christies.com and click on auction schedule and scroll down to January
31.    PC Coker

#96 From: santmin@...
Date: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:04 am
Subject: Re: Ship of the Line Pennsylvania
af12444757
Send Email Send Email
 
PC,
 
I put your question to my son who had sailed the Chesapeake quite a bit and received the following, hope it helps.
 
Bob Santos
**************************************************************************************************************
 

Dad,

 

My guess is that it is Cove Point Light near the Patuxent River.  This light has a very distinctive roof.  It was built in 1828 and the Pennsylvania was launched in 1837 so it was obviously built before the painting and the keepers house was enlarged ( a second floor was added) in 1883 which is after 1861 when she was burned to the waterline at Norfolk.

 

 

Some data:

COVE POINT LIGHT

Location:  Western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 4 miles north of the entrance to the Patuxent River
Date Built:  Commissioned December 1828
Type of Structure:  Conical brick tower with detached keeper’s dwelling
Height:  38 feet
Characteristics:  Flashing white
Foghorn:  Yes
Builder:  John Donahoo
Appropriation:  $6,000
Range:  19 miles
Status:  Standing and Active

 

http://www.cblights.com/lights/covepoint.asp

 

Mark

 


#97 From: "mineadmiral" <mineadmiral@...>
Date: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:47 am
Subject: Ship modelling articles
mineadmiral
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi;
   One of the ship modelling magazines had a 3-part article years ago on
the smaller Lake Erie warships from the war of 1812. Which magazine and
which volumes? Does anyone have these articles that I can get copies of?
Thanks
Chuck

#98 From: Charles Duggie <mineadmiral@...>
Date: Sat Feb 3, 2007 1:44 am
Subject: Battle of Lake Erie armament
mineadmiral
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi;
  The British ships at Lake Erie ( Put-In-Bay ) had a random assortment of guns. The origional intended guns were intercepted and captured by US forces. The Royal Navy then took a random assortment of ( generally smaller ) guns from shore installations. What was the origional intended armament for the RN ships?
 
Thank You
Chuck
 


Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar
alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.

#99 From: Charles Duggie <mineadmiral@...>
Date: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:25 am
Subject: Lake Erie Ships
mineadmiral
Send Email Send Email
 


Hi;
  A few months back someone referred me to a series of 3 articles in a model ship building magazine. These articles were about ships from Lake Erie during the War of 1812. Does anyone know where these articles can be found?
Thanks
Chuck


Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.

#100 From: "Bob Santos" <santmin@...>
Date: Wed Jan 9, 2008 3:48 pm
Subject: Pennsylvania
af12444757
Send Email Send Email
 
The latest issue of PROCEEDINGS has an article on USS Pennsylvania.
Bob Santos

#101 From: PC Coker <cokerre@...>
Date: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:20 am
Subject: Re: Pennsylvania
cokerre
Send Email Send Email
 
--- Bob Santos <santmin@...> wrote:

> The latest issue of PROCEEDINGS has an article on
> USS Pennsylvania.
> Bob Santos
>
>
Hi Bob,
     Thanks for the tip. I have not subscribed to the
Proceedings in 40 years. Any chance you could scan the
photos and article and add it to the data base on the
Forum?
               Happy New Year,
                PC Coker


      
________________________________________________________________________________\
____
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

#102 From: santmin@...
Date: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:00 am
Subject: Re: Pennsylvania
af12444757
Send Email Send Email
 
PC,
Will do.
Bob
 
In a message dated 1/10/2008 10:20:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, cokerre@... writes:


--- Bob Santos <santmin@aol.com> wrote:

> The latest issue of PROCEEDINGS has an article on
> USS Pennsylvania.
> Bob Santos
>
>
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the tip. I have not subscribed to the
Proceedings in 40 years. Any chance you could scan the
photos and article and add it to the data base on the
Forum?
Happy New Year,
PC Coker





Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year.

#103 From: "Richard A. Stratton" <rstratton_cf@...>
Date: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:22 pm
Subject: New book on American ships of the line? - New to me at least.
rstratton_cf
Send Email Send Email
 
I stumbled on the existence of a book that some of you may be
interested in:

America's Line of Battle: Its Construction & History
by T. D. Shiflett
published December 2005

Currently available through Amazon.com for $11.04.  I've ordered one
but have not yet received it so I can't speak to the content.  However,
I have a feeling it's similar to the History of U.S. Ships of the Line
found in the Links section of this forum.

Rick

#105 From: "Friedrich Kappes" <friedrichfilesyg@...>
Date: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:39 pm
Subject: Introduction of Friedrich
alasimb
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello!

My name is Friedrich from Germany. I own some books on ships,
aircraft, airships, helicopters etc. and research to fill the gaps in
these books.
Buying books is a no-no for me, I do not have so much money, and I
already spent much on the books I reviewed at my homepage. But I can
try to get them via inter-library-loan. So names of books and authors
are also of help.
I also searched through all search engines I know, but this takes a
lot of time and nerves to visit hundreds of pages to discover they
have only the information everybody has. One - yes, sometimes even
google can´t help...
So I HAVE TO try other ways, p.e. asking you. For instance: which
books are worth loaning or even buying?
I have listed all my questions and some other information on my
webpage, so this is not only a side asking for help, but also
offering what I found on the net.

Meanwhile I have built a aircraft data list on my webpage.
But there are some questions left...

If I seek a line drawing , I mean a 3-view-drawing, side view, plan 3
vues, Seitenriss, Umrisszeichnung, Profilzeichnung, scale drawing,
three-view, cutaway drawing, admirality plan, Dreiseitenriss,
Längsschnittplan, Takelplan, Seitenprofil, Schiffsskizze, streg
tegning, lines plan, spanterids, body plan, Skizze in 1:1250, 1:1500,
1:625, 1:2000, 1:1000, senga, ...
How do you call a "linedrawing" in Spanish, French, Russian, Polish,
Portuguese, Turkish, Chinese, Rumanian, Norwegian, Korean, Italian...?

You can find all I talked about on my webpage:
Homepage: http://picpage7.tripod.com/communication.html
Questions: http://picpage7.tripod.com/headquarter.html
Mailing Lists: http://picpage7.tripod.com/fleet.html
Aircraft Data: http://www.geocities.com/flugzeugfiles/index.html
Pictures: http://www.geocities.com/glupscherle/intelligence.html
Links: http://picpage7.tripod.com/communication.html

Please visit my homepage, maybe you can help me with my research, or
you find something interesting for you: I have lots of links to
anything concerning ships, aircraft, airships as well as pics, book
reviews, a dictionary and other little helpers.
If I can help you somehow, let me know!!

Thank you and have a nice day!

Friedrich
The FriedrichFiles  on  http://picpage7.tripod.com/flagship.html

#106 From: usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:43 pm
Subject: New file uploaded to usshipsoftheline
usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the usshipsoftheline
group.

   File        : /groups.html
   Uploaded by : alasimb <friedrichfilesyg@...>
   Description :

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/usshipsoftheline/files/groups.html

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/groups/original/members/web/index.htmlfiles

Regards,

alasimb <friedrichfilesyg@...>

#107 From: "Dale Woodward" <delawarerivergallery@...>
Date: Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:51 pm
Subject: US Ships Of The Line Prints
delawarerive...
Send Email Send Email
 

Hi

If you would to see some great prints a early American War ships , click on the link below and follow it Tom Freeman's page, he does some great work.

www.delawarerivergallery.com

Dale


#108 From: "James Friedman" <james.friedman33@...>
Date: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:05 pm
Subject: 1891 USNA Seamanship Manual
jameshf1944
Send Email Send Email
 

 I finally finished copying the 1891 USNA Seamanship Manual into a Word document.

 

I hope someone can use it. It is 829 pages long.

 

See the Rapidshare link below.

 

http://rapidshare.com/files/124253002/Text-Book_of_Seamanship.zip

 

Regards to all,

 

 

James

James.friedman33@...

 


#109 From: "Dirk R. Festus Festerling" <festusdirk@...>
Date: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:21 pm
Subject: RE: 1891 USNA Seamanship Manual
festusdirk
Send Email Send Email
 


James Friedman <james.friedman33@...> schrieb: I finally finished copying the 1891 USNA Seamanship Manual into a Word document. I hope someone can use it. It is 829 pages long.

Thank you! Cool Stuff. We won´t train  our new sailors (teenagers on a church- sponsored-sailing -vacation starting next week) up to us navy standards(, experience shows any kind of education and training is lost on some ;-) ), but your manual looks like a good didactic help to get at least our future "boatswains" and "officers"  thinking about how and why things are done on boats.

festus

#110 From: "James Friedman" <james.friedman33@...>
Date: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:03 am
Subject: 1891 USNA Seamanship Manual - Page 1 and Plate 1 from page 8
jameshf1944
Send Email Send Email
 
Enclosed find a revision to the revised page 1 and also plate 1 from page 8.


Just cut & paste in the proper location.

The plate should come up after you move to the top of page 8 AFTER the
entire manual has loaded. This will have to be done for almost all
plates/photos (The front cover)& drawings in the entire 829 page document.

Regards,
James

The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:

Page one1891 USNA Seamanship Manual
Plate 2 - Page 8


Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent
sending or receiving certain types of file attachments.  Check your e-mail
security settings to determine how attachments are handled.

#111 From: "James Friedman" <james.friedman33@...>
Date: Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:03 am
Subject: 1891 USNA Seamanship Manual
jameshf1944
Send Email Send Email
 
Folks cut and paste this copy of page one (with the HNSA Copyright info on it. I forgot to put it on the original when I transcribed it to word.
 
Regards,
James

#112 From: "Bob Santos" <santmin@...>
Date: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:50 pm
Subject: USS Pennsylvania in a bottle !!
af12444757
Send Email Send Email
 
#113 From: james.friedman33@...
Date: Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:20 pm
Subject: Re: USS Pennsylvania in a bottle !!
jameshf1944
Send Email Send Email
 
Try
 
 
James
 
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Bob Santos" <santmin@...>

#114 From: "camera12003" <camera12003@...>
Date: Sat Jan 3, 2009 7:16 pm
Subject: US Navy Ships of the Line Questions
camera12003
Send Email Send Email
 
First, thanks for the membership in this forum. I have a few questions
regarding these ships.

  First question, were the USN SOL's delineated by classes like the
Constitution class ships were? If so which ships belonged to a class
and what was the chronological order of the classes.

  Second question, These ships are refered to 74 gun vessels but I see
thay were capable of carrying many more guns than their "rate". So, was
the term used as a general type term or was that considered a minimum
of canon for these vessels as designed?

  Third question, the Pennsylvania had three gun decks, most of the
other SOL's had two. Was the Pennsy the largest USN SOL built or did
she have sister ships also?

  Thanks for any replies.
    Cheers,
     Jon

#115 From: PC Coker <cokerre@...>
Date: Sun Jan 4, 2009 5:48 pm
Subject: Re: US Navy Ships of the Line Questions
cokerre
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Jon,
    I am not an expert on the American SOLs but have done a lot of reading, research, and built 3 models of the Delaware.
    They were divided into classes of sorts. First was the Continental America, then some design work was done in the late 1790s for a 74 that was not built. During the War of 1812 the Washington, Franklin, and Independence were built and were considered sisters with mostly minor variations. They were true 74s but were not considered successful as they were poor sailers and in general not up to snuff for the weight of the guns they carried so Franklin and Indepence were cut down to large frigates and lasted well past the Civil War. I am not sure about Washington.
    Next came the Columbus which was considered by some the prototype for the  North Carolina class but slightly smaller. Her lower guns when fully loaded were barely three feet above the water in places. Following her was the North Carolina, cosidered at the time of her first Med deployment in 1824 to be the finest warship in the world. She and Delaware were sisters as was Ohio but the latter had some minor differences. Vermont and New Hampshire were also sisters but completed during the 1840s when the ship type was definitely obsolete. At the very least they should have been given steam power like their foreign contemporaries.
   Last came the lumbering Pennsylvania with three gun decks and the largest sailing warship built for the US. As far as I know she only went to sea once sailing from Philadelphia where she was built to Norfolk where she spent most of her life. She was too expensive to operate in peace time and pretty much a waste of money.
    The rating of these ships is full of conflicting opinions. Some say that a rate was determined by the number of covered guns so that carronades on the spar deck were not included. Others say that it was the dimensions that determined the rate. I know that the North Carolinas were really 80+ gun ships and equivalent to many British three deckers. But over the course of time, a ship type tends to grow in size so that a Revolutionary War 74 would be dwarfed by at post-War of 1812 74. For the most part I would just accept the rating as given and leave it at that as it is pretty much like comparing a World War II destroyer to a contemporary one---difficult to keep in perspective.
    Most of this information is in the links and files section of the web site. There is also a lot of information and plans in Chapelle's History of the American Sailing Navy. There are bits and pieces on the internet, most of which I have added to the links section. If you know of any others, please add them as well as illustrations.
    Hope this helps and that you will add some information to the group.
 
                                          PC Coker
                                           Moderator


 
First, thanks for the membership in this forum. I have a few questions
regarding these ships.

First question, were the USN SOL's delineated by classes like the
Constitution class ships were? If so which ships belonged to a class
and what was the chronological order of the classes.

Second question, These ships are refered to 74 gun vessels but I see
thay were capable of carrying many more guns than their "rate". So, was
the term used as a general type term or was that considered a minimum
of canon for these vessels as designed?

Third question, the Pennsylvania had three gun decks, most of the
other SOL's had two. Was the Pennsy the largest USN SOL built or did
she have sister ships also?

Thanks for any replies.
Cheers,
Jon



#116 From: james.friedman33@...
Date: Sun Jan 4, 2009 6:03 pm
Subject: Re: US Navy Ships of the Line Questions
jameshf1944
Send Email Send Email
 
PC
 
A good example of the ratings and actual numbered of guns carried not being the same would be the Constitution class 44 Gun Frigates. Rated at 44 they routinely carried 50+ with the Constitution carring 54 during the war of 1812.
 
Regards & Happy New Year,
James Friedman
Goose Creek
 
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: PC Coker <cokerre@...>

Hi Jon,
    I am not an expert on the American SOLs but have done a lot of reading, research, and built 3 models of the Delaware.
    They were divided into classes of sorts. First was the Continental America, then some design work was done in the late 1790s for a 74 that was not built. During the War of 1812 the Washington, Franklin, and Independence were built and were considered sisters with mostly minor variations. They were true 74s but were not considered successful as they were poor sailers and in general not up to snuff for the weight of the guns they carried so Franklin and Indepence were cut down to large frigates and lasted well past the Civil War. I am not sure about Washington.
    Next came the Columbus which was considered by some the prototype for the  North Carolina class but slightly smaller. Her lower guns when fully loaded were barely three feet above the water in places. Following her was the North Carolina, cosidered at the time of her first Med deployment in 1824 to be the finest warship in the world. She and Delaware were sisters as was Ohio but the latter had some minor differences. Vermont and New Hampshire were also sisters but completed during the 1840s when the ship type was definitely obsolete. At the very least they should have been given steam power like their foreign contemporaries.
   Last came the lumbering Pennsylvania with three gun decks and the largest sailing warship built for the US. As far as I know she only went to sea once sailing from Philadelphia where she was built to Norfolk where she spent most of her life. She was too expensive to operate in peace time and pretty much a waste of money.
    The rating of these ships is full of conflicting opinions. Some say that a rate was determined by the number of covered guns so that carronades on the spar deck were not included. Others say that it was the dimensions that determined the rate. I know that the North Carolinas were really 80+ gun ships and equivalent to many British three deckers. But over the course of time, a ship type tends to grow in size so that a Revolutionary War 74 would be dwarfed by at post-War of 1812 74. For the most part I would just accept the rating as given and leave it at that as it is pretty much like comparing a World War II destroyer to a contemporary one---difficult to keep in perspective.
    Most of this information is in the links and files section of the web site. There is also a lot of information and plans in Chapelle's History of the American Sailing Navy. There are bits and pieces on the internet, most of which I have added to the links section. If you know of any others, please add them as well as illustrations.
    Hope this helps and that you will add some information to the group.
 
                                          PC Coker
                                           Moderator


 
First, thanks for the membership in this forum. I have a few questions
regarding these ships.

First question, were the USN SOL's delineated by classes like the
Constitution class ships were? If so which ships belonged to a class
and what was the chronological order of the classes.

Second question, These ships are refered to 74 gun vessels but I see
thay were capable of carrying many more guns than their "rate". So, was
the term used as a general type term or was that considered a minimum
of canon for these vessels as designed?

Third question, the Pennsylvania had three gun decks, most of the
other SOL's had two. Was the Pennsy the largest USN SOL built or did
she have sister ships also?

Thanks for any replies.
Cheers,
Jon



#117 From: "camera12003" <camera12003@...>
Date: Thu Jan 8, 2009 2:44 pm
Subject: Incorrect information
camera12003
Send Email Send Email
 
PC I believe you noted that the 74 Gun SOL thread over in the Fine
Scale Modeler Ship Forum had incorrect information in it. What
discrepancies did you find?

#118 From: PC Coker <cokerre@...>
Date: Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:03 am
Subject: Re: Incorrect information
cokerre
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,
   The basic information was correct. The mis-information if such was in describing the ships as poor sailers. Most large sailing ships were unwieldy and few were good sailers as such. The real exception seems to be the US ship of the line Ohio which is described in most accounts as "handling like a frigate".
   The other misconception is asserting that these ships did nothing of note, would we say the same about the Polaris FBM submarines or any of the post-World War II
USN warships?
     The American ships of the line performed notable service in showing the flag and asserting American naval prowess after the War of 1812 showing that the new nation had achieved an industrial level close to those of Europe. After all the warship throughout most of history whether powered by oars, sails, or steam were the best indicator of any nation's industrial creativity. The ship of the line was the epitome of the sailing ship in its complexity to build and operate. With these ships of the line the United States showed that she had arrived and had attained a naval and industrial level equal to those of most European nations.
    When the North Carolina joined the US Mediterranean Squadron in 1824 she was described by one foreign observer as "the finest warship in the world"---hardly the creation of a primitive society!
    The Columbus and Ohio provided yeoman service in the Mexican War in the Pacific and went with Commodore Perry to Japan in 1853. Other ships provided excellent support service in the Civil War as receiving ships and tenders supporting the Union Navy's blockade. Several lasted well past the war and 2 or 3 into the 20th Century.                                                  PC Coker




#119 From: Me Too <camera12003@...>
Date: Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:44 pm
Subject: Re: Incorrect information
camera12003
Send Email Send Email
 
PC,
   Thanks for your reply. I agree with your assessment. When you consider it there are many warships the USN had the never fired a shot yet performed their task through times of peace showing the flag all over the world. A comparable example would be our carriers. All through the 50's and 60's they cruised the med as well as the western pacific performing much the same function as the S's OTL did in the 19th century. One cannot expect a ship so large to manuver or have the same seakeeping qualities as a frigate. Two different ships designed for two different tasks so I think the criticism is misguided.
 
Your forum is not frequented too much but the photo section is great and your Deleware is a beautiful model. I wish I had the patience to build one. Actual information on these ships is so hard to come by. It is a shame none that survived into the early 20th century were preserved. It's only been in recent times the the USN has set about trying to preserve artifacts of its past. Even now though the navy is still dragging its feet about raising some aircraft from the bottom of the sea of which they have no examples of for their museum. In addition, the navy will not allow non government entities to raise and restore those aircraft and will procecute anyone that tries to raise them. The USAF has a different attitude, they don't care if anyone salvages any wreck as long as any human remains are left undisturbed until they can be removed by the military beforehand.
    Jon K.      

--- On Wed, 1/21/09, PC Coker <cokerre@...> wrote:
From: PC Coker <cokerre@...>
Subject: Re: [usshipsoftheline] Incorrect information
To: usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 11:03 PM

Hi,
   The basic information was correct. The mis-information if such was in describing the ships as poor sailers. Most large sailing ships were unwieldy and few were good sailers as such. The real exception seems to be the US ship of the line Ohio which is described in most accounts as "handling like a frigate".
   The other misconception is asserting that these ships did nothing of note, would we say the same about the Polaris FBM submarines or any of the post-World War II
USN warships?
     The American ships of the line performed notable service in showing the flag and asserting American naval prowess after the War of 1812 showing that the new nation had achieved an industrial level close to those of Europe. After all the warship throughout most of history whether powered by oars, sails, or steam were the best indicator of any nation's industrial creativity. The ship of the line was the epitome of the sailing ship in its complexity to build and operate. With these ships of the line the United States showed that she had arrived and had attained a naval and industrial level equal to those of most European nations.
    When the North Carolina joined the US Mediterranean Squadron in 1824 she was described by one foreign observer as "the finest warship in the world"---hardly the creation of a primitive society!
    The Columbus and Ohio provided yeoman service in the Mexican War in the Pacific and went with Commodore Perry to Japan in 1853. Other ships provided excellent support service in the Civil War as receiving ships and tenders supporting the Union Navy's blockade. Several lasted well past the war and 2 or 3 into the 20th Century.                                                  PC Coker





#120 From: "virginiaship" <virginiaship@...>
Date: Thu Mar 19, 2009 2:30 pm
Subject: Virginia Ship-of-the-Line
virginiaship
Send Email Send Email
 
Greetings-

I have a couple of questions about the USS Virginia that never put to sea.  I
see on other posts in this forum that one of the other vessels was originally
named Virginia (can't remember which off-hand) - does anyone know the reason for
this?

Also, there seem to be pictures of every other Ship of the Line, but nothing in
the gallery for Virginia.  I've seen one print of the Virginia being built, but
does anyone have any other drawings or anything?  If not, which of the other
ships was most like the Virginia?

I'm working on a website on ships named Virginia and there is not much out there
on this vessel.

Thanks for any and all information.

Tim
Haymarket, Virginia

#121 From: "Brian Weathersby" <brian@...>
Date: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: Virginia Ship-of-the-Line
the89thguard
Send Email Send Email
 
Have you tried the Dictionary of American Fighting Ships online?  They don't
have much, but they do say that she was a North Carolina class.
http://www.hazegray.org/danfs/line/virginia.htm



--- In usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com, "virginiaship" <virginiaship@...>
wrote:
>
> Greetings-
>
> I have a couple of questions about the USS Virginia that never put to sea.  I
see on other posts in this forum that one of the other vessels was originally
named Virginia (can't remember which off-hand) - does anyone know the reason for
this?
>
> Also, there seem to be pictures of every other Ship of the Line, but nothing
in the gallery for Virginia.  I've seen one print of the Virginia being built,
but does anyone have any other drawings or anything?  If not, which of the other
ships was most like the Virginia?
>
> I'm working on a website on ships named Virginia and there is not much out
there on this vessel.
>
> Thanks for any and all information.
>
> Tim
> Haymarket, Virginia
>

#122 From: "Bruce Nielsen" <blnielsen@...>
Date: Thu Mar 19, 2009 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: Virginia Ship-of-the-Line
lsv8_00
Send Email Send Email
 
Tim,

The book titled, The History of The Sailing Navy—The Ships and Their
Development," by Howard I. Chapelle, documents three ships named "Virginia."

1st was a 28 gun Frigate built in 1776.
2nd was a 14 gun Revenue cutter built in 1798.
3rd one was a 74 gun Ship of the line that was started in 1818, never finished
and broken up on its stocks in 1874.

Much more detail is contained in the book covering your questions.

….Bruce Nielsen


--- In usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com, "virginiaship" <virginiaship@...>
wrote:
>
> Greetings-
>
> I have a couple of questions about the USS Virginia that never put to sea.  I
see on other posts in this forum that one of the other vessels was originally
named Virginia (can't remember which off-hand) - does anyone know the reason for
this?
>
> Also, there seem to be pictures of every other Ship of the Line, but nothing
in the gallery for Virginia.  I've seen one print of the Virginia being built,
but does anyone have any other drawings or anything?  If not, which of the other
ships was most like the Virginia?
>
> I'm working on a website on ships named Virginia and there is not much out
there on this vessel.
>
> Thanks for any and all information.
>
> Tim
> Haymarket, Virginia
>

#123 From: "virginiaship" <virginiaship@...>
Date: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:48 am
Subject: Re: Virginia Ship-of-the-Line
virginiaship
Send Email Send Email
 
Thanks for the quick replies.  I've done research on the ships in question -
actually there are 15 vessels named VIRGINIA that have appeared in the various
'navies' of this country - whether it be pre-US, USRC, USN or CSN.  What I'm
looking for is specifics on this Virginia - for example, why one of the other
ship of the lines was originally named Virginia and then changed.  I'll take a
look for that book and see if they have any clarification...

Tim

--- In usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com, "Bruce Nielsen" <blnielsen@...> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> The book titled, The History of The Sailing Navy—The Ships and Their
Development," by Howard I. Chapelle, documents three ships named "Virginia."
>
> 1st was a 28 gun Frigate built in 1776.
> 2nd was a 14 gun Revenue cutter built in 1798.
> 3rd one was a 74 gun Ship of the line that was started in 1818, never finished
and broken up on its stocks in 1874.
>
> Much more detail is contained in the book covering your questions.
>
> ….Bruce Nielsen
>
>
> --- In usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com, "virginiaship" <virginiaship@> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings-
> >
> > I have a couple of questions about the USS Virginia that never put to sea. 
I see on other posts in this forum that one of the other vessels was originally
named Virginia (can't remember which off-hand) - does anyone know the reason for
this?
> >
> > Also, there seem to be pictures of every other Ship of the Line, but nothing
in the gallery for Virginia.  I've seen one print of the Virginia being built,
but does anyone have any other drawings or anything?  If not, which of the other
ships was most like the Virginia?
> >
> > I'm working on a website on ships named Virginia and there is not much out
there on this vessel.
> >
> > Thanks for any and all information.
> >
> > Tim
> > Haymarket, Virginia
> >
>

#124 From: JOHN KALLAUGHER <john.kallaugher@...>
Date: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:00 pm
Subject: Re: Re: Virginia Ship-of-the-Line
john.kallaug...
Send Email Send Email
 
I think you may be confused with the "Alabama" which was renamed "New Hampshire" when it was commissioned in 1864.  I am pretty sure that the only U.S.N. ship-of-the-line associated with the name "Virginia"  was the ship under construction at Boston navy yard.
--- On Fri, 20/3/09, virginiaship <virginiaship@...> wrote:
From: virginiaship <virginiaship@...>
Subject: [usshipsoftheline] Re: Virginia Ship-of-the-Line
To: usshipsoftheline@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, 20 March, 2009, 11:48 AM

Thanks for the quick replies. I've done research on the ships in question - actually there are 15 vessels named VIRGINIA that have appeared in the various 'navies' of this country - whether it be pre-US, USRC, USN or CSN. What I'm looking for is specifics on this Virginia - for example, why one of the other ship of the lines was originally named Virginia and then changed. I'll take a look for that book and see if they have any clarification. ..

Tim

--- In usshipsoftheline@ yahoogroups. com, "Bruce Nielsen" <blnielsen@. ..> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> The book titled, The History of The Sailing Navy—The Ships and Their Development, " by Howard I. Chapelle, documents three ships named "Virginia."
>
> 1st was a 28 gun Frigate built in 1776.
> 2nd was a 14 gun Revenue cutter built in 1798.
> 3rd one was a 74 gun Ship of the line that was started in 1818, never finished and broken up on its stocks in 1874.
>
> Much more detail is contained in the book covering your questions.
>
> ….Bruce Nielsen
>
>
> --- In usshipsoftheline@ yahoogroups. com, "virginiaship" <virginiaship@ > wrote:
> >
> > Greetings-
> >
> > I have a couple of questions about the USS Virginia that never put to sea. I see on other posts in this forum that one of the other vessels was originally named Virginia (can't remember which off-hand) - does anyone know the reason for this?
> >
> > Also, there seem to be pictures of every other Ship of the Line, but nothing in the gallery for Virginia. I've seen one print of the Virginia being built, but does anyone have any other drawings or anything? If not, which of the other ships was most like the Virginia?
> >
> > I'm working on a website on ships named Virginia and there is not much out there on this vessel.
> >
> > Thanks for any and all information.
> >
> > Tim
> > Haymarket, Virginia
> >
>


Messages 94 - 124 of 187   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help