Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
tribal-India · Focus on tribal life in India
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 1113 - 1142 of 1142   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#1142 From: SAKTI <saktisrk@...>
Date: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:20 am
Subject: Tribal calender link
saktisrk
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Friends
Please see the Tribal calender 2009 & Tribal knowledge complex in

 

http://www.sakti.in/tribal_calendar.html

 

http://www.sakti.in/tribal_culture.htm

Sivaramakrishna



SAKTI A voluntary organization working for the welfare of tribals and conservation of natural resources

Dr.P.Sivaramakrishna & P.Sarada Devi,
305, 1st Block, Janapriya Abodes,
Gandhinagar, Hyderabad -500 080,
India, ph: 040 - 66614787 (o) 66627893 (r)
9441427977 9391077079
visit: www.sakti.in
email: saktisrk@..., saktipsrk@...


#1141 From: mahendra mishra <mahendra_ku@...>
Date: Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:59 pm
Subject: OT: My list of Yahoo Groups
mahendra_ku
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi,

You can see a list of my groups on Grouply at the link below. Maybe you'll find some you want to join.

mahendra

Here's the link:
http://www.grouply.com/register.php?tmg=2676186&vt=47109258





====================
This message was posted by a fellow group member who uses Grouply instead of email to access this group. Grouply blocks additional invitations from being sent to this group by anyone for 30 days. Group owners can permanently block future invitations. For more on how Grouply maintains privacy and protects you, see http://blog.grouply.com/protect/ .



#1140 From: "Stefano Ferrarini" <sferrarini@...>
Date: Sat Mar 22, 2008 8:57 am
Subject: A new book about Paniyas tribe
sferrarini
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

For everyone who is interested in tribal peoples issues i suggest a new book about Paniya tribe of Kerala: "My life among the Paniyas of the Nilgiri Hills" by Hans-Henning Muendel. For additional informations you can go to the author's website: http://www.henningpaniyas.ca  where you can also order the book.

Stefano Ferrarini - Italy


#1139 From: Tom Griffiths <tom@...>
Date: Wed May 30, 2007 3:43 pm
Subject: Fwd: Seeing RED? FPP briefing on "Avoided deforestation"
tom@...
Send Email Send Email
 
30 May 2007

Seeing "RED"? - "Avoided deforestation" policies and the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities

FPP briefing calls for urgent debate on social and rights issues

Dear friends,

Southern and Northern governments, big conservation NGOs, carbon finance companies, climate activists and environmentalists are all promoting avoided deforestation (AD) as a key climate change mitigation measure. They argue AD policies for Reduced Emissions from Deforestations" (RED) must be included under the UNFCCC frameworks post 2012. In the meantime, the World Bank is ploughing ahead with plans to start pilot RED programmes in five tropical countries.

The central idea of AD and RED policies is that that countries should be compensated for protecting the carbon reservoirs in standing forests. In other words, most AD enthusiasts reject the project-by-project approach to forest conservation. They want national or regional schemes that include large areas of forest. This, they say, would reduce the cost of monitoring: its much cheaper to measure deforestation from a satellite than visit lots of different project sites on the ground.

Yet in all current international discussions on AD and RED, relatively little attention has been paid to the social risks and challenges -- or the potential impact of such policies on indigenous peoples and local communities whose livelihoods, cultures and well-being depend on forests. Once again, it seems that indigenous and other forest peoples have not been properly involved in global policy discussions on forests and climate change mitigation. There is a real danger that AD policies could become another global enviornmental scheme to save the world forests that will flounder because affected peoples and social issues were never properly involved from the outset.

The attached briefing examines some of the key similarities and differences in existing AD proposals and highlights potential social risks with large scale international and national AD policies that need to be addressed. The paper is intended to inform indigenous peoples' organisations, forest campaigners and activists of some key social and rights issues surrounding forests and climate mitigation policies.

The briefing paper is available at: http://www.forestpeoples.org/documents/ifi_igo/avoided_deforestation_red_jun07_eng.pdf

In solidarity, Tom Griffiths

NOTE: Translations into Spanish and French will be forthcoming shortly.

#1138 From: Sudipto Muhuri <sudipto@...>
Date: Mon May 28, 2007 7:27 am
Subject: Against the arrest of Dr.Binayak Sen( Vice President, National PUCL)
sudipto@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Friends ,

Forwarding the text of the online petition for the release of Dr. Binayak
Sen who has been arrested by the  Chattishgarh government .The signature
petition is hosted at   http://www.PetitionOnline.com/Binayak/.

Do sign.

bye
Sudipto


==========================================================================

Subject: Safety and liberty of Dr. Binayak Sen, General Secretary of the
Chhattisgarh PUCL and Vice-President of the National PUCL who has been
imprisoned.


Respected Sirs,

This letter is to request your good offices on behalf of a very respected
and beloved old student of Christian Medical College, Vellore who has been
imprisoned this afternoon (May 14, 2007) at Bilaspur for activities in
defense of the rights and liberties of tribal people in Chhattisgarh.

His name is Binayak Sen. He had a distinguished academic career in
Vellore, graduating in Medicine and later acquiring an M.D. in
Paediatrics. From 1976 to 1978, he was a faculty member at the Centre for
Social Medicine and Community Health at the Jawaharlal Nehru University,
New Delhi. He left his academic appointment to work in a community based
rural health centre in Hoshangabad district of M.P. focusing on problems
of tuberculosis. During the late seventies, he became an active member of
the Medico Friend Circle, a national organization of health professionals
working towards an alternative health system responsive to the needs of
the poor. This involvement continues till today.
Binayak worked with mine workers in Dalli Rajahara towards addressing
their health needs, helping them set up and manage their own Shaheed
Hospital. When this hospital no longer required his leadership, Binayak
moved to a mission hospital in Tilda where he worked in Paediatrics and
Community Health. After the death of Shankar Guha Niyogi with whom he was
closely associated, Binayak moved to Raipur. From 1991, he has worked in
developing relevant models of primary health care in Chhattisgarh. He was
a member of the state advisory committee to initiate the community based
health worker programme across Chhattisgarh, now well known as the Mitanin
programme. He also gives his services to a weekly clinic in a tribal
community in Dhamtari district. He continues to provide health care to the
children of the marginalised, especially the migrant labourers. In
recognition of his work, the Christian Medical College, Vellore conferred
on him the Paul Harrison Award in 2004, which is the highest award given
to an alumnus for distinguished service in rural areas. He continues to be
an inspiration to successive generations of students and faculty.



Binayak has been active and effective in defending the liberties of the
disadvantaged, especially through the Peoples Union for Civil Liberties
(PUCL). He has served as the General Secretary of the State PUCL Committee
for the past five years and as Vice President of the National Committee
for the last three years. As General Secretary of the Chhattisgarh PUCL,
he helped organize fact finding campaigns into human rights violations in
the state including custody deaths, fake encounters, hunger deaths,
dysentery epidemics and malnutrition. In recent times he has worked
intensively to bring large scale oppression and malgovernance within the
so called Salwa Judoom in Dantewara to national and international
attention.

One of the individuals being defended by the PUCL in Chattisgarh is Mr.
Piyush Guha, presently in police custody. This in turn has led to threats
and allegations against Binayak. He is being accused of absconding and of
channeling illicit communications. We are anxious for the safety and well
being of this beloved and respected student of ours.

We request you to employ your good offices to ensure that Dr. Binayak Sen
is not subjected to mistreatment, continued unlawful imprisonment or
worse. The instruments of the government failed to save the life of his
mentor Niyogi. It will be a grievous failure if they do not now ensure the
safety and dignity of Binayak Sen.

Respectfully submitted by,


Sincerely,



----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Ring the bell that still can ring.Forget your perfect offering.
           There is a crack in everything.Thats how the light gets in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
       Sudipto Muhuri
       Research Fellow
       Theory Physics Division
       Raman Research Institute
       C.V.Raman Avenue
       Sadashivanagar                     off: 080-23610122(Ext 381)
       Bangalore-560080                   res: 080-23316690(Ext 25)

===================================^^^================================

#1137 From: Sudipto Muhuri <sudipto@...>
Date: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:26 am
Subject: condemn the massacre at NANDIGRAM (online petition)
sudipto@...
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear All

Please sign the online petition regarding the the police massacre of villagers
in Nandigram on 14th March. The draft of the petition is given below.


http://www.petitiononline.com/nandigra/petition.html

Thanks
Sudipto


To:  The Governor, Government of West Bengal

We are writing this to register our strongest protest against the police firing
in Nandigram, on 14th March 2007, killing around 20 villagers and injuring
hundreds.

In the name of industrialisation, the CPI(M) led government has embarked on a
policy of forcibly acquiring agricultural land, using a colonial land
acquisition law. Because of this, thousands of farmers and landless labourers
have been robbed of their livelihood and thousand more await such a fate.

Faced with strong resistance in the villages, the state has unleashed the
barbaric police force and the cadres of CPI(M), on the protesting villages,
with a license to injure or even kill. This happened at Singur in December
2006, Nandigram in January and February 2007. We strongly condemn these
incidents of state repression.

Today, peace has disappeared from all such areas of West Bengal where the
government is adamant on procuring land on behalf of the industrial houses. The
"leftist" government has become aggressive partners in the neoliberal agenda of
profits for a few at the cost of lives of millions of helpless people.

As a group of people committed to uphold the democratic aspirations of the
people of West Bengal and elsewhere, we urge you to immediately take steps such
that -

1. A judicial enquiry is conducted regarding the police firing in Nandigram so
that the guilty are punished

2. All police forces are withdrawn from the affected villages and the media and
other concerned people are allowed to have free access to these places

3. Plans of forced acquisition of agricultural lands are put on hold and the
land acquired in Singur is returned to the owners

4. A democratic process is initiated for a healthy debate on the path of
development to be followed

---------------------------------

#1136 From: "forestworker" <forestworker@...>
Date: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:28 am
Subject: Fw: Emailing: rel_print_page1
forestworker@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
Dear Friends
 
Hope you find the following useful
 
Regards
 
Mahender Jethmalani



Wednesday, February 21, 2007
  Ministry of Tribal Affairs  
 
TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP TO DRAFT RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF FOREST RIGHTS BILL.

 
  14:46 IST  
 
 

Consequent on the enactment of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest rights) Act, 2006 in January, the Central Government has constituted a Technical Support Group under the convenorship of the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, for framing rules under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 for carrying out the provisions of the Act. 

            The Technical Support Group shall prepare the draft rules for carrying out the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 within a period of 3 months  and submit the same to the Government. The composition of the Technical Support Group is as under.

1. Shri S.R. Sankaran                                                                - Chairman

2. Shri Madhav Gadgil                                                                - Member

3. Shri Raman Sukumar                                                             - Member

4. Shri Ram Dayal Munda                                                           - Member

5. Prof. K.c. Malhotra                                                                 - Member

6. Shri Sanjay Upadhyaya                                                          - Member

7. Shri Rangan Dutta                                                                  - Member

8. Prof. Nandini Sundar                                                               - Member

9. Shri d. Bandopadhyay                                                            - Member

10. Smt. Smita Gupta                                                                - Member

11. Shri Kumar Shiralkar                                                             - Member

12. Director General, ICFRE, Dehradun                                        - Member

13. Senior official of Ministry of Environment & Forests                  - Member

14. Senior official of Department of Land Resources                      - Member

15. Senior official of Ministry of Law & Justice                               - Member

16. Senior official of Ministry of Panchayati Raj                             - Member

17. Shri Serjius Minz, Principal Secretary, Forest,

      Govt. of Chhattisgarh                                                            - Member

18. Secretary, Tribal Development, Govt. of HP                             - Member

19. Commissioner & Secretary, Welfare of Plain Tribes and

      Backward Classes, Govt. of Asom, Guwahati                         - Member

20. Commissioner & Secretary, Hill Areas Department, Govt.

      of Asom, Dispur, Guwahati                                                   - Member

21. JS, Ministry of Tribal Affairs                                                   - Member, Convenor

            The Technical Support Group shall meet and work out its action plan for drafting the proposed Rules.  For this purpose, the Technical Support Group may hold consultations with the State Governments/UT administrations individually to take care of State specific differences.  The technical Support Group may also hold regional conferences with experts to finalise the draft rules.

NCJ/DT

 
 

#1135 From: rajeshr@...
Date: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:17 pm
Subject: HI
rrajesh31
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
򈛭[fGm\-`mviU!<[ȤfJ'
P[IMKeZun]Q鴟ϗjY]TuW:
Kgh`-rNG
S1.Y]p77/;yer&?ja٘dp85t88%%QAwQ2d2Ba\
{']<6aE;o7P
7{C
]yr?Sq꫊m?74!"v};毬;bÉ^e۠~e
qb8V
u<S/>r)ͥ7n
崱jդ$PD{>rG:ݝS^JSY՛3ojkt
!&&.bҬ;юDY"'bC[w0}FT:za:2x$K3Q^~
['Of,Д[D-R${&R8*ƍdﯯOԛЪ͞R?#a{9T{m\
fNڂ7Gtr8$~U/i(]Sps6V*OpycFEȊ9DA򵇈%|\
(*v!]l۞DxE4H_Ϩ71uF)zoSP]ɥ(bGd`'5dla
9;F,f\W)~ÐlPYba_ބB&C3] X
$ٶ[{lO4{-~$S8f*ID{y#?hˠWk6u;rF[嶩c٩\
y7)k5f.>}%gĩސ\XVcz߇V|T{%WMGzodqܿaQYv)j?\
wqLm<Cu.n:yc `wܪHGIXwr*Rr܊jCu&dkQNo
v16HS.h%֞T(/PYC|ZLVA>Q–( #KGv
tEMQmq`6휢}ݾX xjB
eNT\MRs
wBeuw$}
gUv!Bqv/vqo
iԠI;YsCImP}x""߽S
ʈLHfe/
jzIl>N(7㒶(
4DFX`V[F}teE',p:AoN-H_kȤMDOW<"gX1$ڧo4ce\
s&si#J͗2Y62!VTEUߋ'-
2fQx"Bh%JMj7TKDQd#W,'[w&u$sKeITS$L_s4š(k뤢o\
XX"!uN­^ȴ
~|8SÛ`ca눙?S!ehȁDuD8Af~&YMH͹ZT-Df]\
"Vک2ցTgIޭI0a'<4,B㑣.rry{kq'b;'6*Q{^Pj
g(x
cͽ-H_)1RقVh,rwwN%D
*|2iKzE҄薵5W0"jSSwcQoyi[V2:*}^ƥ_qT?_?\
,kJB V&Ɣz ]X%dBffjߴ~&NUTnQꖾP<ՓĊ
qA0Pvg[4.}X[i0ӶfUmCII
{9e`U(xM

՚9?3Es#q76臱4p]vYӣ0"^4
հټdӢ&P`PX?/odyyʮ
&SOPSsq(/H_Wwe;C~C.4}"fNhF4(J\
k&ת)d,fE*87k|4el
np qEq{"s~AEc i<ic<.~Ʊy*z͖E)WLyU~`Ms
|PK~⍧,h!1g[
K

satg92]"^]G7:3G[HY&<*-6D9[c|V47!_T0\
9<Tqq؟RbdRY`!W,_TgC<LdgdG\
Nv`S弡W)^"IkIWpTSE?H6Cnh*c⏹ň~ݠ6u1]

#1134 From: "viren" <vlobo_1@...>
Date: Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:45 pm
Subject: Fw: Forest Rights Bill and Jetropha
vitits
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
A meeting was organised at the SPWD Udaipur office to discuss the Forest Rights Bill and the latest development on Jetropha in Rajasthan.
 
 
Some of the points that emerged are as follows  ( this apart from the well known ones like righting a historical wrong, debate on the date of recognising rights, problem arising out of definition of forest dweller, the aspect of responsibility of forest protection with the holder of the right etc ).   
 
1. The attempt to create a mechanism which would eliminate the pitfalls found under PESA in terms of the forest being outside village jurisdiction .  
2. Possibility of conflicts with respect  to those who have settled in separate hamlets in the forest ( whether their rights will be recognised ). Possibility of intra village conflicts as tradition use of forests crosses demarcated boundaries .
3. There is scope for ambiguity in defining rights ..  A lot depends on what interpretation is given in the rules. This relates to those who live in the vicinity of the forest. problems also exist for NTFP rights for those who do not reside in the forest. How will transient pastoralists be defined ( will they have rights in the many forests they pass through ? Will it be for the time period they are there ).
4. The empowerment to adminster duties and responsibilities also make the concerned village authorities public servants under section 21 of the Indian penal code. Considering that it is the gram sabha which is responsible for penalising one of its own members or outsiders for any violation,  how will this operate in practise ? Does the gram sabha subdelegate its power in terms of protection duties to individuals, investigation of offences etc .
 
The session concluded with the need to set up a  Task force to faclitate implementation in such a manner that the spirit of the Bill is not lost ( it not being merely a matter of distributing rights, but a method of mangement and use of the forests  in which community knowledge is given predominance. TRI mentioned that it would be taking up the issue with Panchayat representatives since they will be responsible for implement the Bill. Inputs had already been sought from SPWD and others were also requested to participate.     
 
On the issue of Jetropha, SPWD study and workshop was discussed in some detail . The consensus was that the promotion of Jetropha in the current manner and the aspect of handing over land to companies cannot be accepted. Why can't farmers produce what is needed by industry.  This large scale diversion of land would necessarily mean the uprooting of people be it from agriculture or in terms of curtailment of grazing , NTFP collection etc. . A memorandum was submitted to the Governor ( through the Divisional Commisioner ) the next day . 
 
 
Viren

#1133 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Thu Jan 4, 2007 12:23 pm
Subject: Narmada climb-down, World Bank finally admits project flawed
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

 

Narmada climb-down, World Bank finally admits project flawed *

Print

E-mail

 

Damien Lewis / Gemini   

Wednesday, 03 January 2007

A new 400-page report on India's Narmada River dam project has called for a suspension of World Bank funding for the series of 3,000 dams, because the project is beset by problems. Based on the first ever independent review of a World-Bank-funded megaproject, the report says it is not possible to fairly resettle the 250,000 tribal people about to be displaced, and environmental issues are not being dealt with properly.

Following the report, Bank president Lewis Preston acknowledges that 'performance (of Narmada) has fallen short of ... Bank policies and guidelines.' But although Preston accepts that there are 'deficiencies in the Bank's appraisal of the project, the borrowers' implementation and the Bank's supervision', he still insists that the continued Bank support for the Narmada project is justified.

The Bank has already pumped $450 million into the programme which is scheduled to cost five and a half billion dollars in all and is the world's biggest-ever river project. It involves building a series of dams on the Narmada river. Forest and farmland roughly equivalent in space to 250,000 soccer pitches will be flooded. And up to one and a half million mainly tribal people will be forced to leave their traditional lands.

Proponents of the scheme portray it as a dream development project. According to the corporation set up to build the dams, they will provide 15 billion gallons of water daily, irrigate 11,000 square kilometres of land, protect 750,000 people from flooding and generate 1,450 megawatts of hydroelectric power.

But opponents say it will force 250,000 tribal people out of their fertile forests and devastate the environment. Local opposition to the dam has met with a violent response from the authorities.

The degree of controversy over the project in India and among many Western environmentalists led to Japan axing its funding for the dams last year and prompted the Bank to commission the review.

The report by leading environmentalist Bradford Morse and campaigner Tom Berger accuses the Bank of bending and even ignoring its own policy and Indian law concerning the resettlement of indigenous peoples and the environmental impacts of the project.

It concludes that the numbers of people facing resettlement has been grossly underestimated and that over half are being denied compensation. In addition irrigation potential has been exaggerated and damage to downstream fisheries has been ignored.

While not calling for the Narmada project to be scrapped they advise the Bank to completely reassess it, and add that little can be achieved while construction continues.

Both Morse and Berger are believed to have been under pressure to tone down the report. Both refused, but they did agree to withhold publication until after the Rio Earth Summit.

Selected by Dr.G.S.Bhalla Professor, Department of Commerce and Business Management. Guru Nanak Dev University,Amritsar 

 

 

http://www.punjabnewsline.com/content/view/2338/40/

 

 


#1132 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Wed Jan 3, 2007 1:02 pm
Subject: Tribals protest against graft
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

Tribals protest against graft

Staff Reporter

Bid to storm block office thwarted by leaders


  5,000 people, mostly women, gather at block office

  They allege misappropriation of SHG loans


BERHAMPUR: Angry tribal and dalit demonstrators, including a large number of women, protesting against the alleged corruption at the Sorada block office hurled stones at the Sorada tehsil office and tried to ransack it on Thursday evening. Tribal leaders of the Lok Sangram Manch leading them managed to pacify them before they could do damage to the tehsil office. Around 5,000 tribals and dalits armed with their traditional weapons from 25 panchayats had gheraoed the Sorada block and tehsil offices. Bhanjanagar sub-collector Purna Chandra Pathi and the Sub-divisional Police Officer Narasundar Mishra had to rush to the spot with six sections of armed policemen.

Memo submitted

Earlier, they had handed over a list of seven demands to the local tehsildar, Bichitrananda Nayak after holding a rally and meeting.

The officials tried to make the agitators understand that they cannot make any promise regarding land pattas and filling of vacancies of doctors as the notification for panchayat elections was already issued. The agitators resorted to stone pelting with a view to enter the tehsil office to ransack it.

Budha Gamang, president of the tribal organisation, Lok Sangram Manch, however, managed to pacify the angry agitators.

The demand of agitators included cancellation of the list of beneficiaries for Indira Awas Yojana and old age pension in the .

They alleged misappropriation of loan subsidy provided to Women Self-Help Groups (SHG).

 

http://www.indiapress.org/gen/news.php/The_Hindu/400x60/0

 

 


#1131 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Thu Dec 21, 2006 12:03 pm
Subject: Scheduled Tribe family launches dharna
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

Scheduled Tribe family launches dharna

Staff Correspondent



SEEKING JUSTICE: Members of a Scheduled Tribe family from Sarwad village staging a dharna in Bijapur on Wednesday.

BIJAPUR: Members of a Scheduled Tribe family from Sarwad village, 16 km from here, who were allegedly assaulted by caste Hindus, have launched an indefinite dharna in front of Deputy Commissioner's office after being unable to get a case registered with the police.

The victim, Mallikarjun Hucchappa Batagi, has been on dharna along with his mother, wife and two children since Tuesday. They have threatened to end their lives if the administration failed to go to their rescue.

According to Mr. Batagi, who has also petitioned Social Welfare Minister Balachandra Jarkiholi seeking justice, his neighbour, Mallappa Ishwarappa Koti and others, caste Hindus, assaulted him when he opposed the construction of a toilet blocking the entrance to his house. They also assaulted his aged mother and tore her dress when she tried to prevent them from beating him up, he said. They threatened to finish them off if they continued to oppose the construction, he said. He told presspersons here on Wednesday that the accused had gone to the Babaleshwar police station even before he reached there. They again assaulted him in front of the policemen, who, he alleged, not only did not save him but also refused to register his complaint. Then he came to the district headquarters around 8 p.m. on that day, and narrated the incident to Superintendent of Police Seemanth Kumar Singh who telephoned the police officer concerned. However, it was of no use. He said the family decided to stage the dharna in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office as a last resort.

Mr. Batagi said his was the only Scheduled Tribe family in the locality predominated by caste Hindus, who wanted them (Batagis) to shift from there. He said, "We are ready to vacate provided we are given an alternative site. Let them purchase our property. We are also tired of the hostile atmosphere there."

http://www.indiapress.org/gen/news.php/The_Hindu/400x60/0


#1130 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:20 am
Subject: Tribals feel betrayed by rights law
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

Tribals feel betrayed by rights law

Special Correspondent

NEW DELHI: While welcoming the passage of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill in Parliament, activists of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity, who championed the cause of tribal land rights, have accused the Government of "exposing itself as the agent of forest bureaucracy and private corporations."

In a statement here on Tuesday, tribal representatives said the legislation explicitly not only recognised the tribals' right to land and resources, but also accepted that there were legitimate non-Scheduled Tribe forest dwellers.

"It also recognises our right to rehabilitation in case of past forcible displacement and requires our consent before unscientific and arbitrary resettlement from national parks and sanctuaries. Most importantly, it explicitly recognises our right to conserve, protect and manage the forests, breaking the stranglehold of the autocratic Forest Department for the first time since 1865."

JPC recommendations

However, while conceding the principles that they had argued for, the Government scuttled the law itself. "They manipulated the process, discarded key recommendations of the 30-member Joint Parliamentary Committee's unanimous report and did so at the very last minute such that no one — despite efforts by the Left parties, JPC members and other political leaders — could save the law without giving the Government the chance to stall it entirely."

The Government now defined "forest dwelling" in such a way as to ensure that 90 per cent of the tribals and forest dwellers would be excluded from eligibility for rights under the law.

Entire categories of the most vulnerable non-ST forest dwellers had been excluded.

 

http://www.indiapress.org/gen/news.php/The_Hindu/400x60/0

 

 


#1129 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:20 am
Subject: Government plans legislation for relief to the displaced
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

 

Nation : Government plans legislation for relief to the displaced

Posted by admin on 2006/12/19 8:54:05

New Delhi, Dec 19 (IANS) The government is planning to bring a legislation or statute to ensure that an effective relief package for tribals and other groups displaced by development projects within six months to a year.


While the National Policy for Rehabilitation and Resettlement (NPRR) as well several state policies making special provisions for the resettlement and compensation package for tribals exist, they have not ensured proper packages for the displaced, said Tribal Affairs Secretary Meena Gupta.

"NPRR was unfortunately hardly implemented," Gupta said at a conference on sustainable development organised by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

As NPRR is only a policy and not a statute, "it can only be prescriptive, it cannot be enforced", she said.

To remove the lacunae, Gupta told IANS, "the NPRR is under revision and either a new policy, legislation or a statute is expected to emerge soon.

"We have progressed quite a bit on the revision and the legislation or statute can be expected in six months to one year."

The issue of displacement and rehabilitation is also being addressed in the draft national tribal policy brought out by the tribal affairs ministry.

Some of the issues it seeks to address include mandatory social impact assessment of any project involving displacement, early information to people being affected, consultations with village committees or gram sabhas, and considering least displacement alternatives.

Two major points that may find place in the proposed statute could be calculating resettlement and rehabilitation cost into the project cost and not allowing any project that involves displacement of over 50,000 people, the official indicated.

With tribals being impacted the most in most mining and power projects, Gupta said the tribal affairs ministry favoured "lease rather than acquisition (of land) should be considered in most cases so that the title of the original owner remains".

She mooted that the tribals be allowed to retain the land deed for future use and could share in the company being set up in the community or area so they too could get part of the profits.

The tribal affairs ministry is also for reverting the land to the tribals if the development project or company for which it has been acquired does not commence operation within five years.

http://www.teluguportal.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=25716

 


#1128 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:20 am
Subject: Tribal people welcome passage of Bill in Lok Sabha
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

Tribal people welcome passage of Bill in Lok Sabha

Staff Correspondent

Madikeri: Tribal people of Kodagu district, on Tuesday, welcomed the passing of the Tribal Bill in the Lok Sabha, saying it was a victory for their arduous struggle and would fulfil aspirations of the adivasi people in the country, Kodagu in particular.

Budakattu Krishikara Sangha Madikeri taluk president said the State Government should take steps to declare the tribal areas as "scheduled" at the earliest.

Mr. Muthappa said the passing of the Bill had given a fitting reply to certain non-governmental organisations in Kodagu to stop their alleged anti-tribal activities and instead come out in the open to help their lot. Such NGOs must stop hurling accusations against a few tribal organisations working in the district for the last several decades, he said. The Bill would ensure that non-tribal people living in the forests for over 60 years had equal rights as that of the tribal people, which was a good augury.

The Bill would now ensure development by attracting the attention of the powers-that-be, Mr. Muthappa said.

Sangha's Virajpet taluk president Jenukurubara Ramu said those tribal families that shifted from the Nagarahole National Park from Kodagu side to Veeranahosalli in Mysore district should be brought back and rehabilitated in the forests in the wake of the passing of the Bill.

The adivasis had offered prayers at the Ammalamma temple in the Dubare forests on Monday to celebrate the occasion, R.K. Chandru, former member of the Kodagu Zilla Panchayat, said. The Forest Department as well as the NGOs should stop interfering in the affairs of the adivasis henceforth in the district.

 

http://www.indiapress.org/gen/news.php/The_Hindu/400x60/0

 


#1127 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:20 am
Subject: India's forest people in land win
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

India's forest people in land win

By Mark Dummett
BBC News, Delhi

Traditional house in Meghalaya

Forest people often struggle to adapt to westernised economies

India's parliament has passed a bill giving millions of poor families rights to inhabit the forests which they have lived in for many generations.

The bill, which still requires presidential approval to become law, will give them a legal right to stay in the forest and live off its produce.

But conservationists are worried the bill could damage the forest and lead to an increase in poaching.

More than 40m people live in India's forests, foraging for honey and fruit.

'Injustice'

India's forest dwellers are among the poorest and most marginalised people in the country.

Without the rights to the land of their forefathers, many have been ordered to make way for logging and mining companies.

Tribal people in India

Forest people say they have been robbed of their rights

Those who have resisted complain of being treated like criminals.

The Tribal Affairs Minister, PR Kyndiah, said the government was now recognising rights which had been taken away by environmental laws.

He told parliament that he wanted to do away with that injustice.

Our mission, he said, is to bring relief to the most "deprived of the deprived".

In all, more than 27m people could benefit from this law.

They will be allowed to farm on small plots of land and be given the right to collect forest produce like honey, wax, medicinal plants and herbs.

But they will not be allowed to hunt wild animals. Families living in protected areas of national parks and reserves will be relocated and compensated.

However some conservationists are concerned that the law could encourage more people to move into the forest.

They are worried it could also hamper efforts to protect India's endangered wildlife, such as its tigers.

 

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6193383.stm

 


#1126 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Tue Dec 19, 2006 12:07 pm
Subject: Cong all praise, NGOs sore
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

 

Cong all praise, NGOs sore

Ashutosh Shukla
BhopalDecember 17, 2006

 

The passage of Tribal Rights’ Bill in the Lok Sabha has evoked mixed response in Madhya Pradesh, the State for which the bill is going to have the most far-reaching impact.

While tribal Congress leader Jamuna Devi has hailed the passage of the Bill as a historic moment for the entire tribal population in the country, retired bureaucrat and environmentalist M N Buch said it would spell doom and destruction of surviving forests in India.

On the other hand, the conglomerate of NGOs working among tribals in Madhya Pradesh, which had initially been in the forefront in supporting the Bill, described it as betrayal of the tribal communities.

Talking to Hindustan Times, Jamuna Devi said that recognising rights of tribals on forestland of their habitation is a historic step. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) Government has won the hearts of tribals by introducing the legislation, she added. 

She further said that stringent forest laws in areas in and around national parks and sanctuaries and Forest Conservation Act had made life difficult for the forest dwellers and eviction of tribals had become a common occurrence, but the Tribal Rights Bill would ensure their rights on the land under their possession and guarantee a dignified life to them.

On the contrary, M N Buch said he could foresee death of all forests, particularly watershed forests, in the next 25 years.

“Fortunately I would not be alive by then to see destruction of forests”. The Bill, he said, would do very little good to tribals except for giving them scraps of good-for-nothing land but it would open the forests to privatisation and commercial exploitation.

Buch further said that a fresh spell of encroachments on forestland would be obvious fallout of the Bill and NGOs working among the tribals are always there to encourage it.

He further said that the Bill further proves that the Congress could go no further than paying lip service to late Indira Gandhi, whose greatest feat as Prime Minister was to introduce Forest Conservation Act, 1980 which has gone a long way in preserving remaining forests.

All the work done in that direction would be undone by the Tribal Rights Bill, he warned. Spokesperson for conglomerate of NGOs working among tribals in Madhya Pradesh Anurag Modi condemned the Government for betraying tribal community and other fellow forest dwellers like Dalits, on the issue of forest rights.

He said the Forest Right Bill as passed is an eyewash for the numerous groups who have been waiting for generations to get their due forest rights.

The apprehension that the Bill is being brought to clear the way for the Government to lease out big chunk of forest to private companies has proved right. The NGOs working for tribals’ rights on forest land along with other organisations of the country will launch a movement to secure full right to forest dwellers.

“We are not going to accept half cooked bill”, he added.  Modi further said that the Bill is designed in such a way that it will give by one hand and take away by the other.

Firstly, the forest rights have been limited to Gramsabha limit whereas 90% of the usable forest falls outside the purview of Gramsabha where forest dwellers won’t get any right as per the Bill. The Bill says Forest Dwellers will get forest right within Gramsabha limit. Modi asked why forest dwellers have been limited to Gramsabha whereas all their needs get fulfilled from the forest, which falls outside the Gramsabha limit.

“It has been deliberately done to allow the Government lease out large portions of 90 per cent remaining forest land outside the purview of Gramsabhas to private companies for commercial exploitation”, he said. 

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/5922_1871815,0015002100000001.htm

 

 

 

 


#1125 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:33 am
Subject: Research fellowship for STs
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Research fellowship for STs

In a bid to provide financial assistance to Scheduled Tribes students to pursue M.Phil and Ph.D courses, the Ministry of Tribal Affairs has launched a new Central sector scheme -- Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship -- for 2005-06.

The scheme is open to ST candidates and covers all universities recognised by the University Grants Commission. ST candidates, who have passed post graduate examination in subjects concerned and who desire to pursue research without JRF or UGC -NET or UGC- SSIRNE are the target group for this scheme. Candidates, who registered for M.Phil / Ph.D are eligible for the fellowship. Candidates will be eligible for financial assistance of Rs.8,000 to Rs. 9,000 per month besides other allowances for contingency departmental assistance, escort reader assistance and HRA. The selection is made on the basis of merit and as per the procedure of the UGC. Further details are available on website www.ugc.ac.in.

 


#1124 From: "C.R Bijoy" <rights@...>
Date: Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:04 pm
Subject: FOREST DWELLERS CONDEMN COLLUSION OF GOVERNMENT WITH FOREST BUREAUCRACY, PRIVATE
crbijoy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
#1123 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Wed Dec 6, 2006 12:27 pm
Subject: Jharkhand: Debate on adivasi land rages
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Jharkhand: Debate on adivasi land rages



Jharkhand: Debate on adivasi land ragesSupriya Sharma

Tuesday, December 5, 2006 (Jharkhand):

The debate about using the adivasi land for industrial use is volatile in Jharkhand.

In 2005, the government signed a record number of MoUs. It was a virtual signing spree as the state entered into MoUs with all big steel companies.

A total of 44 MoUs worth a staggering Rs 3,00,000 crore were signed. The biggest ones with Mittal Steel (Rs 40,000 crore), Tata Steel (Rs 53,000 crore), and Jindal (Rs 35,000 crore).

More than a year later the projects are deadlocked. The groundwork has not begun yet.

The adivasi farmer is wary. He remembers the failed promise of the 60s. Nehru's temples of modern
India had left him feeling betrayed.

Instead the state capital is abuzz with stories of how company officials out to scout land were beaten up or chased away by villagers.

In contrast, NDTV's team gets a warm welcome in Sinduwa Village. It is Jharkhand's southern belt Kolhan, an area on the radar of most steel companies.

NDTV visits the area on a day when the leaders of Mancha Kumti, a committee of nine adivasi groups, are here to hold a special training session.

"Who is the government to oust us? We are the original settlers. We have perpetual rights over land," said Devendra Champiya, Gram Ganrajya Movement.

"The entire adivasi belt is packed with plants like TISCO, TELCO, BOKARO, apart from dams and mines. When the plants were set up, the expectation was that jobs would follow. Instead, outsiders came and grabbed the permanent jobs. Tribals fell by the wayside. Now it will be worse. Fewer jobs are available as everything is automated. Tribals simply don't have the skills for technical jobs," he says.

Wronged by history

It's not difficult to see how different strands have come together in the drive against industry. There is an acute sense of being wronged by history, cheated by outsiders, and duped by governments.

Many say the tribals must shed the baggage of the past to move with the times, which makes it important to not look back but look at the present, the current interface between adivasis and industry.

In the mining belt of Noamundi trucks are being loaded, not with raw iron, instead with finely crushed ore.

It's the first step in the value addition chain where instead of raw ore being packed off it is now being processed within the mining area.

"I get Rs 5,000 a month sitting at home, as lease money," said a farmer.

Mati Barjo, has given his land on lease, to one of the steel units. He couldn't be happier with the deal.

"It has been a boon for me. My crop would be destroyed by elephants. I could hardly earn Rs 200 to Rs 300 from the land. Now, I comfortably make Rs 60,000 a year," said Barjo.

It's easy to see how with a failing crop and a changing economy small industrial units can step in to curb rural distress. But repeatedly, we find the units have not created jobs.

"The first month, I was employed by the factory for a single day. They give us daily wages work, not permanent jobs as they promised," said a worker.

Factory owners refuse to speak on camera but the chamber of industry offers a pragmatic view.

"We recommend to those who are setting up plants here that they first create tool rooms, equip adivasis with technical skills, so that they can be employed. There can be no real progress unless we take all along. We are in fact happy to announce that we have found our first adivasi member, the owner of Blessed Consultancy Services, John Kujur," said Arjun Jalan, Jharkhand Chamber of Commerce.

Polarised atmosphere

The name is not John but Sannu Kujur and Anuranjan Kujur. Brothers and partners, they believe in this deeply polarised atmosphere a middle ground can still be found.

"I did my MCA at BIT Mesra in 1990 and then joined SAIL. I was with them for six years when I thought of applying in TCS. They were happy to take me and I was pleased that I was no longer employed on reservations, I was working for a private company," said Anuranjan Kujur, MD, Blessed Consultancy Services.

"They sent me on projects to New York, Australia, London. I traveled all over the world. Industry is good for local people, it brings jobs. But jobs are not the only consideration. What happens to adivasi land," he said.

"When tribals are already parting with their land for industry, in one way, they are giving capital for the project. Why can't they get shares then," questions Anuranjan Kujur, MD, Blessed Consultancy Services.

According to his Anuranjan's brother Sannu, Technical Director, Blessed Consultancy Services, people don't fully understand the feelings of adivasis towards their land. It has come down from generations. Losing it is like losing a piece of one's own identity, he said.

http://www.ndtv.com/morenews/showmorestory.asp?category=National&slug=Jharkhand%3A+Debate+on+adivasi+land+rages&id=97473

 

 


#1122 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Tue Dec 5, 2006 1:02 pm
Subject: Listed lacunae
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Listed lacunae
Setback for Assam tribals
The Assam government’s proposal to include plains tribal communities like the Adivasis (tea tribe), Koch-Rajbonghsis, Morans, Mataks, Tai-Ahoms and Chutias in the Scheduled Tribe list is likely to be delayed as much because some of them may not qualify at all given the Registrar-General of India’s tough stand. The matter is now with the Centre and Union tribal affairs minister PR Kyndiah has made it clear he cannot go ahead unless the proposal is cleared by the RGI and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes. Obviously, to be eligible, every community demanding inclusion in the listed classes has to fulfil certain stipulated criteria. What is difficult to understand is why, despite the issue having been hanging fire since the early 1990s, no efforts were made to expedite the process and ease the bitterness and disillusionment among the communities concerned. The Congress move is purely selfish.
In power with the support of a Bodo party, it has to be in the good books of smaller communities after its traditional ally and vote bank ~ the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind ~ withdrew support, formed its own party, contested the last Assembly elections and bagged 10 seats in the 126-member House. These smaller groups constitute more than 27 per cent of the population and wield influence in as many as two dozen assembly constituencies. At least the case of the seven million Koch-Rajbongshis deserves consideration. They form a majority in at least 26 assembly consitituencies and want their ST status restored. Former chief minister, the late Hiteswar Saikia, granted them ST status by an Ordinance which Parliament failed to ratify and it lapsed before they could enjoy the benefits

http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=3&theme=&usrsess=1&id=139017

 


#1121 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Tue Dec 5, 2006 1:02 pm
Subject: Tribal Activists Delegation Meets PM
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

 

Tribal Activists Delegation Meets PM

Demands Introduction Of Tribal Forest Bill Immediately

 

A DELEGATION of tribal activists and leaders belonging to the CPI(M) met the prime minister Dr Manmohan Singh on November 24, 2006 and demanded that the Tribal Forest Rights Bill be brought before the parliament in the ongoing winter session itself.

 

The delegation, led by Polit Bureau member and MP, Brinda Karat, stressed that the Bill be brought with the changes suggested by the parliamentary committee which studied the Bill and before whom some of them appeared and gave their opinions.

 

The delegation comprised of Jyotin Soren, Praful Lindah, Bal Singh, Oli Patnaik, J Murmu, P Shanmugam, Sanjay Parate, Kera Ram, Duli Chand and Ch Narsingarao. Later Brinda Karat addressed the media at AKG Bhavan along with the delegation members.

 

The following is the full text of the memorandum submitted by the delegation to the prime minister on this occasion:

 

WE tribals representing organisations working in different states including Jharkhand, Chattisgarh, Orissa, West Bengal, Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan would like to congratulate the UPA government for its initiative to bring a Bill to recognise our rights in forests and undo the historical injustices that we have faced for centuries. In some of the states where we are working we face evictions in many areas, we are denied access to forest produce and in many cases we face harassment from forest guards. We earnestly request you to ensure the legislation without delay so as to protect us and our livelihood.

 

Most tribals have no proof of residence because we have never been given the land pattas. Many of us have faced displacement from our land in the forests not once but twice and even thrice in some cases because of projects, mining etc. so we have had to shift to new areas in the forests where we now live. We request you to recognise our rights on the land as this is our only hope for survival. A cut-off date of over two decades ago, i.e. 1980 will mean mass eviction of tribals. We earnestly request you Sir, please do not have such a cut-off date because then instead of helping us the Bill will be used to evict us. 

 

We understand that earlier other forest dwellers who were recognized as such will now be evicted from the forest. We think that this will be a great danger for us as we have lived together for many decades and now if these families are removed after the Bill is passed it will cause great unrest in the forests. Please throw out the big timber contractors and others like that but those who have lived in the forests for decades should not be evicted.

 

Sir, tribal women have had to face many humiliations, beatings and sexual assault. If we have our land and other rights in the forests we can be sure that no one will be able to use our vulnerability to exploit and hurt the women.

 

We have been accused by some interested quarters of destroying the forests. This is like accusing us of destroying our own families because tribals living in the forests are dependent on the forests and cannot survive if the forests do not survive. We are and will always protect the wealth of our forests and our wild life.

 

We appeal to you to bring the Bill with the changes suggested by the parliamentary Committee which studied the Bill and before whom some of us appeared and gave our opinions.

 

http://pd.cpim.org/2006/1203/12032006_brinda%20pc.htm

 

 


#1120 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Sat Dec 2, 2006 10:48 am
Subject: Action Alert
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Outburst of Violence in Proposed Bauxite Mining Area, Visakahpatnam, India

 
The Jindal South West and its coterie of local mining contractors have increased the pressure on tribal communities opposing the proposed bauxite mining project.  They are instigating surrounding villages with false promises and bribery, to get violent against the tribals in whose village the project is to be set up.  There is tension building here with police and company people visiting the village and threatening them.  In order to hold a meeting and give support to the local campaign yesterday, a team of Samata activists went to Nimmlapadu village which is fighting against the proposed mine and has battled for the last 15 years even after the historic Supreme Court judgement.  The team was accompanied by a group of teachers from Denmark who have come to learn about the injustice in the mining area.  Upon instigation from contractors and company people, some tribals from the downstream village descended on them and became violent.  They beat up the people opposing the project and blocked the road preventing the vehicle and our team from leaving the area.  Many people were injured in the conflict that errupted and our team is still caught inside the villages.  We have somehow managed to get the team from Denmark out of the area and they are still on their way to Visakhapatnam.  We still do not have information about our team and vehicle. 
 
 
Samata,
Visakhapatnam




#1119 From: "C.R Bijoy" <rights@...>
Date: Wed Nov 29, 2006 5:22 pm
Subject: Forest Rights Rallies A Huge Success
crbijoy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
#1118 From: "samatha" <Samatha@...>
Date: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:50 am
Subject: Helping tribals land jobs to preserve forests
shankaragiri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

 

Helping tribals land jobs to preserve forests

P. Devarajan


The Korku tribals from Melghat, Amravati

Melghat Tiger Reserve , Amravati

"Aapke paas kheti bari hai kya (Do you have farm land to work on)," one asked the 27-year-old Korku tribal Oomba Chunilal Dhurve. He looked down and replied shyly, "Main paidal hoon (I am a walker)." The graphic poetry in his reply described his status as a landless farm labourer. Oomba is a Korku married to a Gond (a rare happening) and his wife agreed to the marriage as Oomba's family had 60 heads of cattle.

Today, his wife and three children live near Harisal while he works at the Community Research Centre set up by the Nature Conservation Society, Amravati (NCSA) on a 20-acre stretch of land outside the Melghat Tiger Reserve.

Oomba is a Class 10 pass and looks after the land and the mud-walled, bamboo-topped hut in which the office of the centre is located. For company he has his Korku friend, Bhura Chitra Kasdekar from Malur. Bhura is 33 years old, has passed Class 11 and has a two-acre land nearby where his wife and three children live. They need not any more walk all their lives as the centre set up by Kishor Rithe offers them permanent employment.

The centre, which opened on August 15, is named Muthawa, a god of the Korkus. This tribal community has three gods and Muthawa is the most tolerant, happy with any or no offering.

The god lives under a neem tree in Korku villages, explained Bhura. The centre is an effort by the NCSA to work on programmes enabling tribals to make a living outside the Melghat Tiger Reserve.

In the process, "the tiger and his forests can be saved," says Kishor Rithe, president, NCSA. For some time now, NCSA has been operating a medical and an education van in the tribal villages of Melghat, Tadoba, Pench (Maharashtra and M.P.) and Bori Satpuda; there is also an employment cell which tries to locate jobs for young tribals in district towns like Amravati. The centre is another facet of this experiment.

The 20-acre uneven land is a quiet place and two mornings one walked the stretch even as cowherds played on their flutes while leading their animals to graze. In the open air, the musical notes from the flute have a lambent quality; even an unmusical like this writer floated a bit in the air.

One morning, we called in young Ramji to play the wooden instrument for us. Bhura joined to play the instrument as the flute is a habit with the tribals living in this area. The bright, morning notes give way to plaintive throbs in the evenings when they drive back their cattle home. One watched in the spaciousness quietness, the sun rise and fall and late nights, sat over wood fires sharing company with the darkness of open lands.

On Amavasya nights, Oomba does not set out for his home as he believes there is a white, female ghost near a stream, a few yards away from the centre. One night he set out on his cycle and saw the ghost cross over from left to right.

He wheeled back to the centre, sweating all over. Bhura is a good carpenter (he picked it up from his friends in the village) and one afternoon he was slicing bamboos to build a gate. He does not wound the bamboo stalks; rather, the chisel skims over them. While relishing Bhura at work, Kishor and myself spotted a crested hawk eagle with a black cobra in its talons flying some 20 ft over our heads. It flew above our heads, banked and climbed into the stark blue sky. For about five minutes it soared with the cobra hanging from its talons before flying off to a resting place to have its meal. "That surely is a rare sight," remarked Kishor.

Chatting over a fire one night, Kishor talked of his plans for the centre. He wants to train tribals for new jobs and set up a research centre to study wildlife, something on the lines of the famed Smithsonian Institute in US.

Today it may seem tall talk but tomorrow it could well be a reality.

"There is always the fear that in the process of upgrading the skills of tribals to lead better lives, one may lose sight of the prime objective — conservation of forests and animals. For me, the centre is a means to preserve the pristine forests of Central India, and every day I keep reminding myself of the first job," Kishor remarked. Forest conservation is a low priority item in modern India though city dwellers pack tiger sanctuaries on holidays. The lie of the 20-acre land will be left undisturbed so that over time, birds will feel free to start breeding. On the forest floors, a young generation of tribals wants to lead city lives like this writer. They realise forests cannot be ploughed for a living and even if the Tribal Bill provides for it, they are not keen on it. Like you and me, they would like to buy the facilities thrown up by modern city civilisation. The centre has a mobile and Oomba and Bhura operate it to keep in touch with the world outside.

One evening we were at Khamda village at the northern end of the Melghat Tiger Reserve talking to middle-aged tribals.

"We want to leave the forests," they told us, as " children do not have quality schools to study. We are not bothered about ourselves. For us our children are more important."

If State Governments can buy land for corporates to set up Special Economic Zones with no taxes, there is no reason why the same cannot be done for tribals to replant them outside the forests. If forests go, the tribals will be the worst hit; and not those who scream in favour of the Tribal Bill.

Khamda village near the Tapi River (acting as the border between Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh) may not even be located by Google World. The citizens of Khamda village have to trudge miles to get anything.

 


#1117 From: "C.R Bijoy" <rights@...>
Date: Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:03 pm
Subject: Press Release: Sansad Gherao Maha Rally
crbijoy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
#1116 From: "C.R Bijoy" <rights@...>
Date: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:36 pm
Subject: Press Release: Sangma Writes In Support of JPC, Forest Rights Dharna Continues
crbijoy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
From: Campaign for Survival and Dignity <forestcampaignnews@...>
Subject: Press Release: Sangma Writes In Support of JPC, Forest Rights Dharna Continues
Date:  Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:21:34 IST
CAMPAIGN FOR SURVIVAL AND DIGNITY
National Convenor: Pradip Prabhu, 3, Yezdeh Behram, Kati, Malyan,
Dahanu Rd. 401602.
Delhi Contact: Q-1 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi 110 016. Ph: 26569023,
9968293978.

PRESS RELEASE
FOREST RIGHTS DHARNA SUCCESSFUL IN FIRST DAYS NCP LEADER PA SANGMA WRITES TO PRIME MINISTER IN SUPPORT OF FOREST RIGHTS BILL AND JPC REPORT
Other Political Leaders Also Express Support



In its first two days, the forest rights dharna has been a success, with representative from five States (Maharashtra, Nagar Haveli, Gujarat, Rajashtan, and Tamil Nadu) now present and other States arriving in the coming days.

Yesterday, the dharna also received the good news that former Lok Sabha Speaker PA Sangma, General Secretary of the Nationalist Congress Party, has written to the Prime Minister demanding that the forest rights Bill be passed.  Saying that this legislation "should not be allowed to be sabotaged or undermined due to misplaced concerns", Shri Sangma called on the government to accept the report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee, which he said "has done an excellent,
objective and comprehensive job."

Shri Sangma specifically reported four of the key recommendations of the JPC and strongly objected to the government's stand on rejecting non-ST forest dwellers (some groups of which the JPC had recommended for inclusion) and the government's persistence with a cutoff date of
1980.  He said the former amounted to "unfair discrimination."  Recent rumoured proposals of two Bills, one for SC's and one for ST's, would lead to "competitive politics around forest rights" and "damage both forests and tribals."  He concluded by saying that, now that the JPC
has completed its work, he "fails to understand why the Bill should now be further delayed."

Shri Faggan Khulaste of the Bharatiya Janata Party also visited the dharna yesterday to express his strong support for the cause of the forest dwellers and the tribals and their struggle for a just and effective forest rights Bill.  Shri Baba Panchsare of the Dalit Adivasi Sangharsh Samiti (affiliated to the All India Forward Bloc) also visited the dharna on Wednesday to declare his solidarity.

The dharna received these good news with great enthusiasm.  More people are arriving from Tamil Nadu and Chattisgarh in the coming days.  The people are preparing for the large rally planned for the 29th, when 12,000 to 15,000 people are expected to march in Delhi, and
around 80,000 in simultaneous demonstrations in Mumbai, Bhubaneshwar, Ranchi, Chennai and Bangalore.

A copy of Shri Sangma's letter is attached.

LETTER OF SHRI P.A. SANGMA
Member, Lok Sabha
General Secretary, Nationalist Congress Party



To:
Dr. Manmohan Singh
Hon'ble Prime Minister of India

    Sub:- Concerns regarding government's position on Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005

Dear Sir,
    I am writing in connection with the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005, one of the most historic initiatives undertaken by our UPA government.  This initiative is further in fulfillment of a promise made in the CMP.
    Sir, the draft Bill as tabled in Parliament was referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee in December 2005.  The JPC, chaired by Shri Kishore Chandra Deo of the Congress party, undertook a detailed consideration of the Bill and gave a unanimous report in May of this year with more than thirty recommendations.  Sir, these are key recommendations and I believe that the JPC has done an excellent, objective and comprehensive job.
    It is in this context that I am very disturbed to hear repeated reports from the press, my fellow Members of Parliament and other parties that sections in the government are fiercely opposed to the JPC's recommendations and are intent on rejecting them.  Specifically four important recommendations are being opposed: empowerment of the gram sabha in the process of decision-making over rights; safeguards for resettlement of forest dwellers; changing the 1980 cutoff date; and inclusion of non-ST's in the ambit of the Bill.
    Sir, the first of these recommendations is a Constitutional requirement in Scheduled Areas under the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, and moreover would guarantee transparency and accountability in the rights recognition process.  Retaining the original Bill's provisions would lead to denial of rights and corruption.  The second of these matters has already been de facto accepted by the government in the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act
of this year, so once again I cannot see why it should now be opposed.
    The remaining two matters are even more serious, particularly the 1980 cutoff date.  This will lead to massive evictions across the country given the enormous amount of displacement, numbers of evictions etc. that have happened in the 26 years since that date.  An entire generation has been born and come of age in that time.  Further it is entirely arbitrary to hold that those who have been occupying and cultivating land since after 1980 should not have their rights recognized but that 11 lakh hectares of forest land should allowed to be diverted for mining and industry in the same period.  I am told further that the argument is being made that the Supreme Court is being seen as a threat to changing the 1980 date; sir, we are a democracy and cannot allow the Supreme Court to dictate to us on policy decisions which belong to the domain of Parliament.  A recent cutoff date is the only just option.
    I also support the inclusion of non-ST's in the manner that the JPC has recommended.  While tribals are the original forest dwellers, one cannot ignore the large population of non-ST forest dwellers in many States who have resided in the forest and on their lands for generations.  These people also have rights and their claims cannot be ignored.  Therefore, the JPC had recommended that those who have lived in the forest for three generations should have their rights recognized, as well as those who have been forced into forest land by the government (such as forest villages, repatriates or displaced people).  Not including these people amounts to unfair discrimination.
    Finally, on this last issue I am particularly disturbed to hear rumours that the government is intent either on excluding non-ST's, on potentially drafting a separate legislation for SC's alone, leaving non-ST rights to be handled by executive orders, etc.  Sir, these are all ideas that would result in a great deal of confusion on the ground, with a multiplicity of authorities.  The notion of a separate legislation for SC's in particular would create a very dangerous precedent of deciding forest rights on the basis of caste identity, which in turn could lead to competitive politics around demanding forest rights.  This would damage both the forests and the tribals.

    Sir, there is growing discontent and unrest in forest and tribal areas across India due to the continued delay of the government in bringing this Bill.  The JPC has studied the Bill and heard all
parties; one fails to understand why the Bill should now be further delayed.  I am sure your office and the concerned Ministries will take these matters into consideration when coming to a decision.  This legislation is a matter of settling a historical injustice committed against the poorest people of our country.  It should not be allowed to be sabotaged or undermined due to misplaced concerns.


Sincerely,

#1115 From: "C.R Bijoy" <rights@...>
Date: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:10 am
Subject: TRIBALS AND FOREST DWELLERS BEGIN FOREST RIGHTS DHARNA
crbijoy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
From:  Campaign for Survival and Dignity <forestcampaignnews@... >
Subject: Press Release: Forest Rights Dharna Begins Tomorrow
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:44:38 IST
        
CAMPAIGN FOR SURVIVAL AND DIGNITY
National Convenor: Pradip Prabhu, 3, Yezdeh Behram, Kati, Malyan,
Dahanu Rd. 401602.
Delhi Contact: SRUTI, Q-1 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi 110 016. Ph:
9968293978, 26569023.

PRESS RELEASE

TRIBALS AND FOREST DWELLERS BEGIN FOREST RIGHTS DHARNA TOMORROW
NATIONAL DEMONSTRATIONS PLANNED FOR 29TH

Tomorrow, on the first day of the Parliament session, tribals and forest dwellers from Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Nagar Haveli, Tamil Nadu, Orissa, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh and Karnataka will begin a dharna to demand the immediate passage of a  just and effective legislation for the recognition of the rights of forest dwelling communities.

For too long, this government has sat on the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005, and the report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee that not only endorsed the Bill but recommended a number of significant changes that would democratise the Bill.  The government is instead intent on retaining a Bill that would have clauses that would result in massive corruption, abuse of power and forest destruction, all while claiming that the government is concerned about the environment.

Even as it resists this Bill in the name of the environment, the government passes policies like the new Environmental Impact Assessment notification, policies for privatisation of forests and the Special Economic Zones Act all of which will result in massive
forest and environmental destruction.

The government has shown that it cares neither for the environment nor for forest dwellers' rights only for the power of money and multinational corporations.

The dharna will demand the immediate passage of this legislation with the required amendments.  We also demand the repeal of these and other policies that will result in massive environmental damage and the loss of our homelands.

On November 29th, in support of these same demands, mass demonstrations will be held in Delhi, Mumbai, Ranchi, Bhubaneshwar, Bangalore and Chennai.  More than 80,000 people are expected to participate.


On behalf of the Convening Collective

Bharat Jan Andolan, National Front for Tribal Self Rule, Jangal Adhikar Sangharsh Samiti (Mah), Adivasi Mahasabha (Guj), Adivasi Jangal Janjeevan Andolan (D&NH), Jangal Jameen Jan Andolan (Raj), National Forum of Forest Peoples and Forest Workers, Madhya Pradesh Van Adhikar Abhiyan (MP), Jan Shakti Sanghatan (Chat), Peoples Alliance for Livelihood Rights, Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha, Orissa Jan Sangharsh Morcha, Campaign for Survival & Dignity (Ori), Orissa Adivasi Manch, Orissa Jan Adhikar Morcha, Adivasi Aikya Vedike (AP), Budakattu Krishikara Sangha (Kar), Campaign for Survival and Dignity TN, Bharat Jan Andolan (Jhar).

--
Campaign for Survival and Dignity



#1114 From: "vaidyasandeep2000" <vaidyasandeep2000@...>
Date: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:01 pm
Subject: Justice for Afzal Guru
vaidyasandee...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Justice for Afzal Guru

"Afzal Guru's hanging will reinforce the perception of two sets of
legal norms prevalent in

a society polarising fast on communal lines."



To find out more about the Afzal Guru case  go to this link:

http://www.justiceforafzalguru.org



ACTION ALERT


**** Sign Our Open Letters ****

- Letter to the Indian President
http://www.petitiononline.com/ekta1/petition.html
To read and endorse this letter click the link above.

- Letter the Indian National Human Rights Commission (NHRC.)
http://justiceforafzalguru.org/private/nhrc2.html
To read this letter, click the link above.

You can also send endorsments for both the letters to:
admin@...

Partial list of endorsors so far include Anand Patwardhan, Noam
Chomsky, S. A. R. Geelani,

Ved Bhasin, Ziauddin Sardar and Praful Bidwai.


Send in your endorsments today!


Sandeep

#1113 From: Madhu Sarin <msarin@...>
Date: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:59 am
Subject: Re: [polavaram] Central Empowered Committee Order
madhu_sarin
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
So, although with several conditions, the CEC has suggested a go ahead for Polavaram. In the bargain, a huge area will go for 'compensatory afforestation'; a large reserve forest area will be added to the wildlife sanctuary and the whole area converted into a national park after throwing out some additional 'scattered' villages, and it is unclear which area will be used for R&R. In sum, the villagers will not only get displaced but will lose access to the additional forest area converted into a national park and people in the region will lose access to the area allocated for R & R, thereby fuelling resentment against the displaced rehabilitated there.
 
Shouldn't some of the petitioners now go to the Supreme Court against the CEC decision of recommending that an enlarged sanctuary be converted into a national park? Surely there need to be more rational criteria for recommending such a change as it will involve additional displacement and loss of access to common pool forest resources for a population already traumatised with the threat of impending displacement. What also needs to be looked into is which land has been identified for 'compensatory afforestation' and what it's current uses are.
 
As pointed out by Down to Earth, the same happened in the case of Subansiri dam in Arunachal Pradesh where declaration of the catchment of the dam as a national park led to more displacement than the dam itself!
 
Madhu
----- Original Message -----
From: SAKTI
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 8:48 PM
Subject: [polavaram] Central Empowered Committee Order

Dear all
Please find in attachment the CEC (Central Empowered Committee) recommentdation on Polavaram (Indira Sagar Dam). And also my 2nd affidavit before the committee.
Regards,
P.Sivaramakrishna


SAKTI A voluntary organization working for the welfare of tribals and conservation of natural resources

Dr.P.Sivaramakrishna & P.Sarada Devi,
30
Sponsored Link


Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $310,000 Mortgage for $999/mo - Calculate new house payment


Messages 1113 - 1142 of 1142   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help