====================
This message was posted by a fellow group member who uses Grouply instead of email to access this group. Grouply blocks additional invitations from being sent to this group by anyone for 30 days. Group owners can permanently block future invitations. For more on how Grouply maintains privacy and protects you, see http://blog.grouply.com/protect/ .
For everyone who is interested in tribal peoples issues i suggest a new book about Paniya tribe of Kerala: "My life among the Paniyas of the Nilgiri Hills" by Hans-Henning Muendel. For additional informations you can go to the author's website: http://www.henningpaniyas.ca where you can also order the book.
Seeing "RED"? - "Avoided deforestation"
policies and the rights of indigenous peoples and local
communities
FPP briefing calls for urgent debate on social and rights issues
Dear friends,
Southern and Northern governments, big conservation NGOs, carbon finance
companies, climate activists and environmentalists are all promoting
avoided deforestation (AD) as a key climate change mitigation measure.
They argue AD policies for Reduced Emissions from Deforestations"
(RED) must be included under the UNFCCC frameworks post 2012. In the
meantime, the World Bank is ploughing ahead with plans to start pilot RED
programmes in five tropical countries.
The central idea of AD and RED policies is that that countries should
be compensated for protecting the carbon reservoirs in standing
forests. In other words, most AD enthusiasts reject the
project-by-project approach to forest conservation. They want
national or regional schemes that include large areas of
forest. This, they say, would reduce the cost of monitoring: its much
cheaper to measure deforestation from a satellite than visit lots of
different project sites on the ground.
Yet in all current international discussions on AD and RED, relatively
little attention has been paid to the social risks and challenges -- or
the potential impact of such policies on indigenous peoples and local
communities whose livelihoods, cultures and well-being depend on forests.
Once again, it seems that indigenous and other forest peoples have not
been properly involved in global policy discussions on forests and
climate change mitigation. There is a real danger that AD policies could
become another global enviornmental scheme to save the world forests that
will flounder because affected peoples and social issues were never
properly involved from the outset.
The attached briefing examines some of the key similarities and
differences in existing AD proposals and highlights potential social
risks with large scale international and national AD policies that need
to be addressed. The paper is intended to inform indigenous peoples'
organisations, forest campaigners and activists of some key social and
rights issues surrounding forests and climate mitigation
policies.
Dear Friends ,
Forwarding the text of the online petition for the release of Dr. Binayak
Sen who has been arrested by the Chattishgarh government .The signature
petition is hosted at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/Binayak/.
Do sign.
bye
Sudipto
==========================================================================
Subject: Safety and liberty of Dr. Binayak Sen, General Secretary of the
Chhattisgarh PUCL and Vice-President of the National PUCL who has been
imprisoned.
Respected Sirs,
This letter is to request your good offices on behalf of a very respected
and beloved old student of Christian Medical College, Vellore who has been
imprisoned this afternoon (May 14, 2007) at Bilaspur for activities in
defense of the rights and liberties of tribal people in Chhattisgarh.
His name is Binayak Sen. He had a distinguished academic career in
Vellore, graduating in Medicine and later acquiring an M.D. in
Paediatrics. From 1976 to 1978, he was a faculty member at the Centre for
Social Medicine and Community Health at the Jawaharlal Nehru University,
New Delhi. He left his academic appointment to work in a community based
rural health centre in Hoshangabad district of M.P. focusing on problems
of tuberculosis. During the late seventies, he became an active member of
the Medico Friend Circle, a national organization of health professionals
working towards an alternative health system responsive to the needs of
the poor. This involvement continues till today.
Binayak worked with mine workers in Dalli Rajahara towards addressing
their health needs, helping them set up and manage their own Shaheed
Hospital. When this hospital no longer required his leadership, Binayak
moved to a mission hospital in Tilda where he worked in Paediatrics and
Community Health. After the death of Shankar Guha Niyogi with whom he was
closely associated, Binayak moved to Raipur. From 1991, he has worked in
developing relevant models of primary health care in Chhattisgarh. He was
a member of the state advisory committee to initiate the community based
health worker programme across Chhattisgarh, now well known as the Mitanin
programme. He also gives his services to a weekly clinic in a tribal
community in Dhamtari district. He continues to provide health care to the
children of the marginalised, especially the migrant labourers. In
recognition of his work, the Christian Medical College, Vellore conferred
on him the Paul Harrison Award in 2004, which is the highest award given
to an alumnus for distinguished service in rural areas. He continues to be
an inspiration to successive generations of students and faculty.
Binayak has been active and effective in defending the liberties of the
disadvantaged, especially through the Peoples Union for Civil Liberties
(PUCL). He has served as the General Secretary of the State PUCL Committee
for the past five years and as Vice President of the National Committee
for the last three years. As General Secretary of the Chhattisgarh PUCL,
he helped organize fact finding campaigns into human rights violations in
the state including custody deaths, fake encounters, hunger deaths,
dysentery epidemics and malnutrition. In recent times he has worked
intensively to bring large scale oppression and malgovernance within the
so called Salwa Judoom in Dantewara to national and international
attention.
One of the individuals being defended by the PUCL in Chattisgarh is Mr.
Piyush Guha, presently in police custody. This in turn has led to threats
and allegations against Binayak. He is being accused of absconding and of
channeling illicit communications. We are anxious for the safety and well
being of this beloved and respected student of ours.
We request you to employ your good offices to ensure that Dr. Binayak Sen
is not subjected to mistreatment, continued unlawful imprisonment or
worse. The instruments of the government failed to save the life of his
mentor Niyogi. It will be a grievous failure if they do not now ensure the
safety and dignity of Binayak Sen.
Respectfully submitted by,
Sincerely,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ring the bell that still can ring.Forget your perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.Thats how the light gets in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sudipto Muhuri
Research Fellow
Theory Physics Division
Raman Research Institute
C.V.Raman Avenue
Sadashivanagar off: 080-23610122(Ext 381)
Bangalore-560080 res: 080-23316690(Ext 25)
===================================^^^================================
Dear All
Please sign the online petition regarding the the police massacre of villagers
in Nandigram on 14th March. The draft of the petition is given below.
http://www.petitiononline.com/nandigra/petition.html
Thanks
Sudipto
To: The Governor, Government of West Bengal
We are writing this to register our strongest protest against the police firing
in Nandigram, on 14th March 2007, killing around 20 villagers and injuring
hundreds.
In the name of industrialisation, the CPI(M) led government has embarked on a
policy of forcibly acquiring agricultural land, using a colonial land
acquisition law. Because of this, thousands of farmers and landless labourers
have been robbed of their livelihood and thousand more await such a fate.
Faced with strong resistance in the villages, the state has unleashed the
barbaric police force and the cadres of CPI(M), on the protesting villages,
with a license to injure or even kill. This happened at Singur in December
2006, Nandigram in January and February 2007. We strongly condemn these
incidents of state repression.
Today, peace has disappeared from all such areas of West Bengal where the
government is adamant on procuring land on behalf of the industrial houses. The
"leftist" government has become aggressive partners in the neoliberal agenda of
profits for a few at the cost of lives of millions of helpless people.
As a group of people committed to uphold the democratic aspirations of the
people of West Bengal and elsewhere, we urge you to immediately take steps such
that -
1. A judicial enquiry is conducted regarding the police firing in Nandigram so
that the guilty are punished
2. All police forces are withdrawn from the affected villages and the media and
other concerned people are allowed to have free access to these places
3. Plans of forced acquisition of agricultural lands are put on hold and the
land acquired in Singur is returned to the owners
4. A democratic process is initiated for a healthy debate on the path of
development to be followed
---------------------------------
TECHNICAL SUPPORT GROUP TO DRAFT RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF FOREST RIGHTS BILL.
14:46 IST
Consequent on the enactment of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest rights) Act, 2006 in January, the Central Government has constituted a Technical Support Group under the convenorship of the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, for framing rules under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 for carrying out the provisions of the Act.
The Technical Support Group shall prepare the draft rules for carrying out the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 within a period of 3 monthsand submit the same to the Government. The composition of the Technical Support Group is as under.
1. Shri S.R. Sankaran- Chairman
2. Shri Madhav Gadgil- Member
3. Shri Raman Sukumar- Member
4. Shri Ram Dayal Munda- Member
5. Prof. K.c. Malhotra- Member
6. Shri Sanjay Upadhyaya- Member
7. Shri Rangan Dutta- Member
8. Prof. Nandini Sundar- Member
9. Shri d. Bandopadhyay- Member
10. Smt. Smita Gupta- Member
11. Shri Kumar Shiralkar- Member
12. Director General, ICFRE, Dehradun- Member
13. Senior official of Ministry of Environment & Forests- Member
14. Senior official of Department of Land Resources- Member
15. Senior official of Ministry of Law & Justice- Member
16. Senior official of Ministry of Panchayati Raj- Member
17. Shri Serjius Minz, Principal Secretary, Forest,
Govt. of Chhattisgarh- Member
18. Secretary, Tribal Development, Govt. of HP- Member
19. Commissioner & Secretary, Welfare of Plain Tribes and
Backward Classes, Govt. of Asom, Guwahati- Member
20. Commissioner & Secretary, Hill Areas Department, Govt.
of Asom, Dispur, Guwahati- Member
21. JS, Ministry of Tribal Affairs- Member, Convenor
The Technical Support Group shall meet and work out its action plan for drafting the proposed Rules.For this purpose, the Technical Support Group may hold consultations with the State Governments/UT administrations individually to take care of State specific differences.The technical Support Group may also hold regional conferences with experts to finalise the draft rules.
A meeting was organised at the SPWD Udaipur office to discuss the Forest Rights Bill and the latest development on Jetropha in Rajasthan.
Some of the points that emerged are as follows ( this apart from the well known ones like righting a historical wrong, debate on the date of recognising rights, problem arising out of definition of forest dweller, the aspect of responsibility of forest protection with the holder of the right etc ).
1. The attempt to create a mechanism which would eliminate the pitfalls found under PESA in terms of the forest being outside village jurisdiction .
2. Possibility of conflicts with respect to those who have settled in separate hamlets in the forest ( whether their rights will be recognised ). Possibility of intra village conflicts as tradition use of forests crosses demarcated boundaries .
3. There is scope for ambiguity in defining rights .. A lot depends on what interpretation is given in the rules. This relates to those who live in the vicinity of the forest. problems also exist for NTFP rights for those who do not reside in the forest. How will transient pastoralists be defined ( will they have rights in the many forests they pass through ? Will it be for the time period they are there ).
4. The empowerment to adminster duties and responsibilities also make the concerned village authorities public servants under section 21 of the Indian penal code. Considering that it is the gram sabha which is responsible for penalising one of its own members or outsiders for any violation, how will this operate in practise ? Does the gram sabha subdelegate its power in terms of protection duties to individuals, investigation of offences etc .
The session concluded with the need to set up a Task force to faclitate implementation in such a manner that the spirit of the Bill is not lost ( it not being merely a matter of distributing rights, but a method of mangement and use of the forests in which community knowledge is given predominance. TRI mentioned that it would be taking up the issue with Panchayat representatives since they will be responsible for implement the Bill. Inputs had already been sought from SPWD and others were also requested to participate.
On the issue of Jetropha, SPWD study and workshop was discussed in some detail . The consensus was that the promotion of Jetropha in the current manner and the aspect of handing over land to companies cannot be accepted. Why can't farmers produce what is needed by industry. This large scale diversion of land would necessarily mean the uprooting of people be it from agriculture or in terms of curtailment of grazing , NTFP collection etc. . A memorandum was submitted to the Governor ( through the Divisional Commisioner ) the next day .
Narmada climb-down, World Bank finally admits project
flawed *
Damien Lewis / Gemini
Wednesday, 03 January 2007
A new 400-page report on India's NarmadaRiver dam
project has called for a suspension of World Bank funding for the series of
3,000 dams, because the project is beset by problems. Based on the first ever
independent review of a World-Bank-funded megaproject, the report says it is
not possible to fairly resettle the 250,000 tribal people about to be
displaced, and environmental issues are not being dealt with properly.
Following the report, Bank president
Lewis Preston acknowledges that 'performance (of Narmada) has
fallen short of ... Bank policies and guidelines.' But although Preston accepts
that there are 'deficiencies in the Bank's appraisal of the project, the
borrowers' implementation and the Bank's supervision', he still insists that
the continued Bank support for the Narmada project is
justified.
The Bank has already pumped $450
million into the programme which is scheduled to cost five and a half billion
dollars in all and is the world's biggest-ever river project. It involves
building a series of dams on the Narmada river. Forest and
farmland roughly equivalent in space to 250,000 soccer pitches will be
flooded. And up to one and a half million mainly tribal people will be forced
to leave their traditional lands.
Proponents of the scheme portray it as
a dream development project. According to the corporation set up to build the
dams, they will provide 15 billion gallons of water daily, irrigate 11,000
square kilometres of land, protect 750,000 people from flooding and generate
1,450 megawatts of hydroelectric power.
But opponents say it will force 250,000
tribal people out of their fertile forests and devastate the environment.
Local opposition to the dam has met with a violent response from the
authorities.
The degree of controversy over the
project in India and among many Western
environmentalists led to Japan axing its funding for the dams last year and
prompted the Bank to commission the review.
The report by leading environmentalist
Bradford Morse and campaigner Tom Berger accuses the Bank of bending and even
ignoring its own policy and Indian law concerning the resettlement of
indigenous peoples and the environmental impacts of the project.
It concludes that the numbers of
people facing resettlement has been grossly underestimated and that over half
are being denied compensation. In addition irrigation potential has been
exaggerated and damage to downstream fisheries has been ignored.
While not calling for the Narmada project
to be scrapped they advise the Bank to completely reassess it, and add that
little can be achieved while construction continues.
Both Morse and Berger are believed to
have been under pressure to tone down the report. Both refused, but they did
agree to withhold publication until after the Rio Earth Summit.
Selected by Dr.G.S.Bhalla
Professor, Department of Commerce and Business Management. GuruNanakDevUniversity,Amritsar
5,000 people, mostly
women, gather at block office
They allege
misappropriation of SHG loans
BERHAMPUR:
Angry tribal and dalit demonstrators, including a large number of women,
protesting against the alleged corruption at the Sorada block office hurled
stones at the Sorada tehsil office and tried to ransack it on Thursday evening.
Tribal leaders of the Lok Sangram Manch leading them managed to pacify them
before they could do damage to the tehsil office. Around 5,000 tribals and dalits
armed with their traditional weapons from 25 panchayats had gheraoed the Sorada
block and tehsil offices. Bhanjanagar sub-collector Purna Chandra Pathi and the
Sub-divisional Police Officer Narasundar Mishra had to rush to the spot with
six sections of armed policemen.
Memo submitted
Earlier,
they had handed over a list of seven demands to the local tehsildar, Bichitrananda
Nayak after holding a rally and meeting.
The
officials tried to make the agitators understand that they cannot make any
promise regarding land pattas and filling of vacancies of doctors as the
notification for panchayat elections was already issued. The agitators resorted
to stone pelting with a view to enter the tehsil office to ransack it.
Budha Gamang,
president of the tribal organisation, Lok Sangram Manch, however, managed to
pacify the angry agitators.
The
demand of agitators included cancellation of the list of beneficiaries for
Indira Awas Yojana and old age pension in the .
They
alleged misappropriation of loan subsidy provided to Women Self-Help Groups
(SHG).
SEEKING JUSTICE: Members of a Scheduled Tribe
family from Sarwad village staging a dharna in Bijapur on Wednesday.
BIJAPUR:
Members of a Scheduled Tribe family from Sarwad village, 16 km from here, who
were allegedly assaulted by caste Hindus, have launched an indefinite dharna in
front of Deputy Commissioner's office after being unable to get a case
registered with the police.
The
victim, Mallikarjun Hucchappa Batagi, has been on dharna along with his mother,
wife and two children since Tuesday. They have threatened to end their lives if
the administration failed to go to their rescue.
According
to Mr. Batagi, who has also petitioned Social Welfare Minister Balachandra Jarkiholi
seeking justice, his neighbour, Mallappa Ishwarappa Koti and others, caste
Hindus, assaulted him when he opposed the construction of a toilet blocking the
entrance to his house. They also assaulted his aged mother and tore her dress
when she tried to prevent them from beating him up, he said. They threatened to
finish them off if they continued to oppose the construction, he said. He told
presspersons here on Wednesday that the accused had gone to the Babaleshwar
police station even before he reached there. They again assaulted him in front
of the policemen, who, he alleged, not only did not save him but also refused
to register his complaint. Then he came to the district headquarters around 8 p.m. on that day, and narrated the
incident to Superintendent of Police Seemanth Kumar Singh who telephoned the
police officer concerned. However, it was of no use. He said the family decided
to stage the dharna in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office as a last
resort.
Mr.
Batagi said his was the only Scheduled Tribe family in the locality
predominated by caste Hindus, who wanted them (Batagis) to shift from there. He
said, "We are ready to vacate provided we are given an alternative site.
Let them purchase our property. We are also tired of the hostile atmosphere
there."
NEW DELHI: While welcoming the passage of the
Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest
Rights) Bill in Parliament, activists of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity,
who championed the cause of tribal land rights, have accused the Government of
"exposing itself as the agent of forest bureaucracy and private
corporations."
In a statement
here on Tuesday, tribal representatives said the legislation explicitly not
only recognised the tribals' right to land and resources, but also accepted
that there were legitimate non-Scheduled Tribe forest dwellers.
"It
also recognises our right to rehabilitation in case of past forcible
displacement and requires our consent before unscientific and arbitrary
resettlement from national parks and sanctuaries. Most importantly, it
explicitly recognises our right to conserve, protect and manage the forests,
breaking the stranglehold of the autocratic Forest Department for the first
time since 1865."
JPC recommendations
However,
while conceding the principles that they had argued for, the Government
scuttled the law itself. "They manipulated the process, discarded key
recommendations of the 30-member Joint Parliamentary Committee's unanimous
report and did so at the very last minute such that no one — despite
efforts by the Left parties, JPC members and other political leaders —
could save the law without giving the Government the chance to stall it
entirely."
The
Government now defined "forest dwelling" in such a way as to ensure
that 90 per cent of the tribals and forest dwellers would be excluded from
eligibility for rights under the law.
Entire
categories of the most vulnerable non-ST forest dwellers had been excluded.
New Delhi, Dec 19 (IANS) The government is planning to bring a
legislation or statute to ensure that an effective relief package for tribals
and other groups displaced by development projects within six months to a
year.
While the National Policy for Rehabilitation and Resettlement (NPRR) as well
several state policies making special provisions for the resettlement and
compensation package for tribals exist, they have not ensured proper packages
for the displaced, said Tribal Affairs Secretary Meena Gupta.
"NPRR was unfortunately hardly implemented," Gupta said at a
conference on sustainable development organised by the Confederation of
Indian Industry (CII).
As NPRR is only a policy and not a statute, "it can only be
prescriptive, it cannot be enforced", she said.
To remove the lacunae, Gupta told IANS, "the NPRR is under revision and
either a new policy, legislation or a statute is expected to emerge soon.
"We have progressed quite a bit on the revision and the legislation or
statute can be expected in six months to one year."
The issue of displacement and rehabilitation is also being addressed in the
draft national tribal policy brought out by the tribal affairs ministry.
Some of the issues it seeks to address include mandatory social impact
assessment of any project involving displacement, early information to people
being affected, consultations with village committees or gram sabhas, and
considering least displacement alternatives.
Two major points that may find place in the proposed statute could be
calculating resettlement and rehabilitation cost into the project cost and
not allowing any project that involves displacement of over 50,000 people,
the official indicated.
With tribals being impacted the most in most mining and power projects, Gupta
said the tribal affairs ministry favoured "lease rather than acquisition
(of land) should be considered in most cases so that the title of the
original owner remains".
She mooted that the tribals be allowed to retain the land deed for future use
and could share in the company being set up in the community or area so they
too could get part of the profits.
The tribal affairs ministry is also for reverting the land to the tribals if
the development project or company for which it has been acquired does not
commence operation within five years.
Tribal people welcome
passage of Bill in Lok Sabha
Staff
Correspondent
Madikeri:
Tribal people of Kodagu district, on Tuesday, welcomed the passing of the
Tribal Bill in the Lok Sabha, saying it was a victory for their arduous
struggle and would fulfil aspirations of the adivasi people in the country, Kodagu
in particular.
Budakattu
Krishikara Sangha Madikeri taluk president said the State Government should
take steps to declare the tribal areas as "scheduled" at the
earliest.
Mr. Muthappa
said the passing of the Bill had given a fitting reply to certain
non-governmental organisations in Kodagu to stop their alleged anti-tribal
activities and instead come out in the open to help their lot. Such NGOs must
stop hurling accusations against a few tribal organisations working in the
district for the last several decades, he said. The Bill would ensure that
non-tribal people living in the forests for over 60 years had equal rights as
that of the tribal people, which was a good augury.
The Bill
would now ensure development by attracting the attention of the powers-that-be,
Mr. Muthappa said.
Sangha's Virajpet
taluk president Jenukurubara Ramu said those tribal families that shifted from
the NagaraholeNational Park from Kodagu side to Veeranahosalli in Mysore district should be brought back and rehabilitated in
the forests in the wake of the passing of the Bill.
The adivasis
had offered prayers at the Ammalamma temple in the Dubare forests on Monday to
celebrate the occasion, R.K. Chandru, former member of the Kodagu Zilla Panchayat,
said. The Forest Department as well as the NGOs should stop interfering in the
affairs of the adivasis henceforth in the district.
Forest people often
struggle to adapt to westernised economies
India's parliament has passed a bill giving millions of poor families rights
to inhabit the forests which they have lived in for many generations.
The bill, which still requires presidential approval to
become law, will give them a legal right to stay in the forest and live off
its produce.
But conservationists are worried the bill could damage
the forest and lead to an increase in poaching.
More than 40m people live in India's forests,
foraging for honey and fruit.
'Injustice'
India's forest dwellers are among the poorest
and most marginalised people in the country.
Without the rights to the land of their forefathers, many
have been ordered to make way for logging and mining companies.
Forest people say
they have been robbed of their rights
Those who have resisted complain of being treated like
criminals.
The Tribal Affairs Minister, PR Kyndiah, said the
government was now recognising rights which had been taken away by
environmental laws.
He told parliament that he wanted to do away with that
injustice.
Our mission, he said, is to bring relief to the most
"deprived of the deprived".
In all, more than 27m people could benefit from this law.
They will be allowed to farm on small plots of land and
be given the right to collect forest produce like honey, wax, medicinal
plants and herbs.
But they will not be allowed to hunt wild animals.
Families living in protected areas of national parks and reserves will be
relocated and compensated.
However some conservationists are concerned that the law
could encourage more people to move into the forest.
They are worried it could also hamper efforts to protect India's endangered
wildlife, such as its tigers.
The passage of Tribal Rights’ Bill in the Lok Sabha has
evoked mixed response in Madhya Pradesh, the State for which the bill is going
to have the most far-reaching impact.
While tribal Congress leader Jamuna Devi has hailed the passage of
the Bill as a historic moment for the entire tribal population in the country,
retired bureaucrat and environmentalist M N Buch said it would spell doom and
destruction of surviving forests in India.
On the other hand, the conglomerate of NGOs working among tribals
in Madhya Pradesh, which had initially been in the forefront in supporting the
Bill, described it as betrayal of the tribal communities.
Talking to Hindustan Times, Jamuna Devi said that recognising
rights of tribals on forestland of their habitation is a historic step. The
United Progressive Alliance (UPA) Government has won the hearts of tribals by
introducing the legislation, she added.
She further said that stringent forest laws in areas in and around
national parks and sanctuaries and Forest Conservation Act had made life
difficult for the forest dwellers and eviction of tribals had become a common
occurrence, but the Tribal Rights Bill would ensure their rights on the land
under their possession and guarantee a dignified life to them.
On the contrary, M N Buch said he could foresee death of all forests,
particularly watershed forests, in the next 25 years.
“Fortunately I would not be alive by then to see destruction
of forests”. The Bill, he said, would do very little good to tribals
except for giving them scraps of good-for-nothing land but it would open the
forests to privatisation and commercial exploitation.
Buch further said that a fresh spell of encroachments on
forestland would be obvious fallout of the Bill and NGOs working among the tribals
are always there to encourage it.
He further said that the Bill further proves that the Congress
could go no further than paying lip service to late Indira Gandhi, whose
greatest feat as Prime Minister was to introduce Forest Conservation Act, 1980
which has gone a long way in preserving remaining forests.
All the work done in that direction would be undone by the Tribal
Rights Bill, he warned. Spokesperson for conglomerate of NGOs working among tribals
in Madhya Pradesh Anurag Modi condemned the Government for betraying tribal
community and other fellow forest dwellers like Dalits, on the issue of forest
rights.
He said the Forest Right Bill as passed is an eyewash for the
numerous groups who have been waiting for generations to get their due forest
rights.
The apprehension that the Bill is being brought to clear the way
for the Government to lease out big chunk of forest to private companies has
proved right. The NGOs working for tribals’ rights on forest land along
with other organisations of the country will launch a movement to secure full
right to forest dwellers.
“We are not going to accept half cooked bill”, he
added. Modi further said that the Bill is designed in such a way that it
will give by one hand and take away by the other.
Firstly, the forest rights have been limited to Gramsabha limit
whereas 90% of the usable forest falls outside the purview of Gramsabha where
forest dwellers won’t get any right as per the Bill. The Bill says Forest
Dwellers will get forest right within Gramsabha limit. Modi asked why forest
dwellers have been limited to Gramsabha whereas all their needs get fulfilled
from the forest, which falls outside the Gramsabha limit.
“It has been deliberately done to allow the Government lease
out large portions of 90 per cent remaining forest land outside the purview of Gramsabhas
to private companies for commercial exploitation”, he said.
In
a bid to provide financial assistance to Scheduled Tribes students to pursue M.Phil
and Ph.D courses, the Ministry of Tribal Affairs has launched a new Central
sector scheme -- Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship -- for 2005-06.
The
scheme is open to ST candidates and covers all universities recognised by the
University Grants Commission. ST candidates, who have passed post graduate
examination in subjects concerned and who desire to pursue research without JRF
or UGC -NET or UGC- SSIRNE are the target group for this scheme. Candidates,
who registered for M.Phil / Ph.D are eligible for the fellowship. Candidates
will be eligible for financial assistance of Rs.8,000 to Rs. 9,000 per month
besides other allowances for contingency departmental assistance, escort reader
assistance and HRA. The selection is made on the basis of merit and as per the
procedure of the UGC. Further details are available on website www.ugc.ac.in.
The debate about using the adivasi land for industrial use is volatile
in Jharkhand.
In 2005, the government signed a record number of MoUs. It was a virtual
signing spree as the state entered into MoUs with all big steel companies.
A total of 44 MoUs worth a staggering Rs 3,00,000 crore were signed. The
biggest ones with Mittal Steel (Rs 40,000 crore), Tata Steel (Rs 53,000 crore),
and Jindal (Rs 35,000 crore).
More than a year later the projects are deadlocked. The groundwork has not
begun yet.
The adivasi farmer is wary. He remembers the failed promise of the 60s. Nehru's
temples of modern India had left him feeling betrayed.
Instead the state capital is abuzz with stories of how company officials out to
scout land were beaten up or chased away by villagers.
In contrast, NDTV's team gets a warm welcome in Sinduwa Village. It is Jharkhand's
southern belt Kolhan, an area on the radar of most steel companies.
NDTV visits the area on a day when the leaders of Mancha Kumti, a committee of
nine adivasi groups, are here to hold a special training session.
"Who is the government to oust us? We are the original settlers. We have
perpetual rights over land," said Devendra Champiya, Gram Ganrajya
Movement.
"The entire adivasi belt is packed with plants like TISCO, TELCO, BOKARO,
apart from dams and mines. When the plants were set up, the expectation was
that jobs would follow. Instead, outsiders came and grabbed the permanent jobs.
Tribals fell by the wayside. Now it will be worse. Fewer jobs are available as
everything is automated. Tribals simply don't have the skills for technical
jobs," he says.
Wronged by history
It's not difficult to see how different strands have come together in the drive
against industry. There is an acute sense of being wronged by history, cheated
by outsiders, and duped by governments.
Many say the tribals must shed the baggage of the past to move with the times,
which makes it important to not look back but look at the present, the current
interface between adivasis and industry.
In the mining belt of Noamundi trucks are being loaded, not with raw iron,
instead with finely crushed ore.
It's the first step in the value addition chain where instead of raw ore being
packed off it is now being processed within the mining area.
"I get Rs 5,000 a month sitting at home, as lease money," said a
farmer.
Mati Barjo, has given his land on lease, to one of the steel units. He couldn't
be happier with the deal.
"It has been a boon for me. My crop would be destroyed by elephants. I
could hardly earn Rs 200 to Rs 300 from the land. Now, I comfortably make Rs
60,000 a year," said Barjo.
It's easy to see how with a failing crop and a changing economy small
industrial units can step in to curb rural distress. But repeatedly, we find
the units have not created jobs.
"The first month, I was employed by the factory for a single day. They
give us daily wages work, not permanent jobs as they promised," said a
worker.
Factory owners refuse to speak on camera but the chamber of industry offers a
pragmatic view.
"We recommend to those who are setting up plants here that they first
create tool rooms, equip adivasis with technical skills, so that they can be
employed. There can be no real progress unless we take all along. We are in
fact happy to announce that we have found our first adivasi member, the owner
of Blessed Consultancy Services, John Kujur," said Arjun Jalan, Jharkhand
Chamber of Commerce.
Polarised atmosphere
The name is not John but Sannu Kujur and Anuranjan Kujur. Brothers and
partners, they believe in this deeply polarised atmosphere a middle ground can
still be found.
"I did my MCA at BIT Mesra in 1990 and then joined SAIL. I was with them
for six years when I thought of applying in TCS. They were happy to take me and
I was pleased that I was no longer employed on reservations, I was working for
a private company," said Anuranjan Kujur, MD, Blessed Consultancy
Services.
"They sent me on projects to New York, Australia, London. I traveled all
over the world. Industry is good for local people, it brings jobs. But jobs are
not the only consideration. What happens to adivasi land," he said.
"When tribals are already parting with their land for industry, in one
way, they are giving capital for the project. Why can't they get shares
then," questions Anuranjan Kujur, MD, Blessed Consultancy Services.
According to his Anuranjan's brother Sannu, Technical Director, Blessed
Consultancy Services, people don't fully understand the feelings of adivasis
towards their land. It has come down from generations. Losing it is like losing
a piece of one's own identity, he said.
Listed lacunae Setback for Assam tribals The Assam government’s proposal to include plains
tribal communities like the Adivasis (tea tribe), Koch-Rajbonghsis, Morans, Mataks,
Tai-Ahoms and Chutias in the Scheduled Tribe list is likely to be delayed as
much because some of them may not qualify at all given the Registrar-General of
India’s tough stand. The matter is now with the Centre and Union tribal affairs minister
PR Kyndiah has made it clear he cannot go ahead unless the proposal is cleared
by the RGI and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes. Obviously, to be
eligible, every community demanding inclusion in the listed classes has to fulfil
certain stipulated criteria. What is difficult to understand is why, despite
the issue having been hanging fire since the early 1990s, no efforts were made
to expedite the process and ease the bitterness and disillusionment among the
communities concerned. The Congress move is purely selfish. In power with the support of a Bodo party, it has to be
in the good books of smaller communities after its traditional ally and vote
bank ~ the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind ~ withdrew support, formed its own party,
contested the last Assembly elections and bagged 10 seats in the 126-member
House. These smaller groups constitute more than 27 per cent of the population
and wield influence in as many as two dozen assembly constituencies. At least
the case of the seven million Koch-Rajbongshis deserves consideration. They
form a majority in at least 26 assembly consitituencies and want their ST
status restored. Former chief minister, the late Hiteswar Saikia, granted them
ST status by an Ordinance which Parliament failed to ratify and it lapsed
before they could enjoy the benefits
Demands Introduction Of TribalForest Bill Immediately
A DELEGATION of tribal activists and leaders belonging to the CPI(M)
met the prime minister Dr Manmohan Singh on November 24, 2006 and demanded that
the Tribal Forest Rights Bill be brought before the parliament in the ongoing
winter session itself.
The delegation, led by Polit Bureau member and MP, Brinda Karat,
stressed that the Bill be brought with the changes suggested by the
parliamentary committee which studied the Bill and before whom some of them
appeared and gave their opinions.
The delegation comprised of Jyotin Soren, Praful Lindah, Bal Singh, Oli
Patnaik, J Murmu, P Shanmugam, Sanjay Parate, Kera Ram, Duli Chand and Ch Narsingarao.
Later Brinda Karat addressed the media at AKG Bhavan along with the delegation
members.
The following is the full text of the memorandum submitted by the
delegation to the prime minister on this occasion:
WE tribals
representing organisations working in different states including Jharkhand, Chattisgarh,
Orissa, West
Bengal,
Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan would like to congratulate the UPA
government for its initiative to bring a Bill to recognise our rights in
forests and undo the historical injustices that we have faced for centuries. In
some of the states where we are working we face evictions in many areas, we are
denied access to forest produce and in many cases we face harassment from
forest guards. We earnestly request you to ensure the legislation without delay
so as to protect us and our livelihood.
Most tribals
have no proof of residence because we have never been given the land pattas.
Many of us have faced displacement from our land in the forests not once but
twice and even thrice in some cases because of projects, mining etc. so we have
had to shift to new areas in the forests where we now live. We request you to recognise
our rights on the land as this is our only hope for survival. A cut-off date of
over two decades ago, i.e. 1980 will mean mass eviction of tribals. We
earnestly request you Sir, please do not have such a cut-off date because then
instead of helping us the Bill will be used to evict us.
We
understand that earlier other forest dwellers who were recognized as such will
now be evicted from the forest. We think that this will be a great danger for
us as we have lived together for many decades and now if these families are
removed after the Bill is passed it will cause great unrest in the forests.
Please throw out the big timber contractors and others like that but those who
have lived in the forests for decades should not be evicted.
Sir,
tribal women have had to face many humiliations, beatings and sexual assault.
If we have our land and other rights in the forests we can be sure that no one
will be able to use our vulnerability to exploit and hurt the women.
We have
been accused by some interested quarters of destroying the forests. This is
like accusing us of destroying our own families because tribals living in the
forests are dependent on the forests and cannot survive if the forests do not
survive. We are and will always protect the wealth of our forests and our wild
life.
We appeal
to you to bring the Bill with the changes suggested by the parliamentary
Committee which studied the Bill and before whom some of us appeared and gave
our opinions.
Outburst of Violence in Proposed Bauxite Mining Area, Visakahpatnam, India
The Jindal South West and its coterie of local mining contractors have increased the pressure on tribal communities opposing the proposed bauxite mining project. They are instigating surrounding villages with false promises and bribery, to get violent against the tribals in whose village the project is to be set up. There is tension building here with police and company people visiting the village and threatening them. In order to hold a meeting and give support to the local campaign yesterday, a team of Samata activists went to Nimmlapadu village which is fighting against the proposed mine and has battled for the last 15 years even after the historic Supreme Court judgement. The team was accompanied by a group of teachers from Denmark who have come to learn about the injustice in the mining area. Upon instigation from contractors and company people, some tribals from the downstream village descended on them and became violent. They beat up the people opposing the project and blocked the road preventing the vehicle and our team from leaving the area. Many people were injured in the conflict that errupted and our team is still caught inside the villages. We have somehow managed to get the team from Denmark out of the area and they are still on their way to Visakhapatnam. We still do not have information about our team and vehicle.
"Aapke paas kheti bari hai kya (Do you
have farm land to work on)," one asked the 27-year-old Korku tribal Oomba Chunilal
Dhurve. He looked down and replied shyly, "Main
paidal hoon (I am a walker)." The graphic poetry in his
reply described his status as a landless farm labourer. Oomba is a Korku
married to a Gond (a rare happening) and his wife agreed to the marriage as Oomba's
family had 60 heads of cattle.
Today,
his wife and three children live near Harisal while he works at the Community
Research Centre set up by the Nature Conservation Society, Amravati (NCSA) on a
20-acre stretch of land outside the Melghat Tiger Reserve.
Oomba
is a Class 10 pass and looks after the land and the mud-walled, bamboo-topped
hut in which the office of the centre is located. For company he has his Korku
friend, Bhura Chitra Kasdekar from Malur. Bhura is 33 years old, has passed
Class 11 and has a two-acre land nearby where his wife and three children live.
They need not any more walk all their lives as the centre set up by Kishor Rithe
offers them permanent employment.
The
centre, which opened on August 15, is named Muthawa, a god of the Korkus. This
tribal community has three gods and Muthawa is the most tolerant, happy with
any or no offering.
The
god lives under a neem tree in Korku villages, explained Bhura. The centre is
an effort by the NCSA to work on programmes enabling tribals to make a living
outside the Melghat Tiger Reserve.
In
the process, "the tiger and his forests can be saved," says Kishor Rithe,
president, NCSA. For some time now, NCSA has been operating a medical and an
education van in the tribal villages of Melghat, Tadoba, Pench (Maharashtra and
M.P.) and Bori Satpuda; there is also an employment cell which tries to locate
jobs for young tribals in district towns like Amravati. The
centre is another facet of this experiment.
The
20-acre uneven land is a quiet place and two mornings one walked the stretch
even as cowherds played on their flutes while leading their animals to graze.
In the open air, the musical notes from the flute have a lambent quality; even
an unmusical like this writer floated a bit in the air.
One
morning, we called in young Ramji to play the wooden instrument for us. Bhura
joined to play the instrument as the flute is a habit with the tribals living
in this area. The bright, morning notes give way to plaintive throbs in the
evenings when they drive back their cattle home. One watched in the
spaciousness quietness, the sun rise and fall and late nights, sat over wood
fires sharing company with the darkness of open lands.
On
Amavasya nights, Oomba does not
set out for his home as he believes there is a white, female ghost near a stream,
a few yards away from the centre. One night he set out on his cycle and saw the
ghost cross over from left to right.
He
wheeled back to the centre, sweating all over. Bhura is a good carpenter (he
picked it up from his friends in the village) and one afternoon he was slicing
bamboos to build a gate. He does not wound the bamboo stalks; rather, the
chisel skims over them. While relishing Bhura at work, Kishor and myself
spotted a crested hawk eagle with a black cobra in its talons flying some 20 ft
over our heads. It flew above our heads, banked and climbed into the stark blue
sky. For about five minutes it soared with the cobra hanging from its talons
before flying off to a resting place to have its meal. "That surely is a
rare sight," remarked Kishor.
Chatting
over a fire one night, Kishor talked of his plans for the centre. He wants to
train tribals for new jobs and set up a research centre to study wildlife,
something on the lines of the famed Smithsonian Institute in US.
Today
it may seem tall talk but tomorrow it could well be a reality.
"There
is always the fear that in the process of upgrading the skills of tribals to
lead better lives, one may lose sight of the prime objective —
conservation of forests and animals. For me, the centre is a means to preserve
the pristine forests of Central India, and
every day I keep reminding myself of the first job," Kishor remarked. Forest
conservation is a low priority item in modern India though
city dwellers pack tiger sanctuaries on holidays. The lie of the 20-acre land
will be left undisturbed so that over time, birds will feel free to start
breeding. On the forest floors, a young generation of tribals wants to lead
city lives like this writer. They realise forests cannot be ploughed for a
living and even if the Tribal Bill provides for it, they are not keen on it.
Like you and me, they would like to buy the facilities thrown up by modern city
civilisation. The centre has a mobile and Oomba and Bhura operate it to keep in
touch with the world outside.
One
evening we were at Khamda village at the northern end of the Melghat Tiger
Reserve talking to middle-aged tribals.
"We
want to leave the forests," they told us, as " children do not have
quality schools to study. We are not bothered about ourselves. For us our
children are more important."
If
State Governments can buy land for corporates to set up Special Economic Zones
with no taxes, there is no reason why the same cannot be done for tribals to
replant them outside the forests. If forests go, the tribals will be the worst
hit; and not those who scream in favour of the Tribal Bill.
Khamda
village near the TapiRiver (acting
as the border between Maharashtra and
Madhya Pradesh) may not even be located by Google World. The citizens of Khamda
village have to trudge miles to get anything.
From: Campaign for Survival and Dignity <forestcampaignnews@...>
Subject: Press Release: Sangma Writes In Support of JPC, Forest Rights Dharna Continues
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:21:34 IST
CAMPAIGN FOR SURVIVAL AND DIGNITY
National Convenor: Pradip Prabhu, 3, Yezdeh Behram, Kati, Malyan,
Dahanu Rd. 401602.
Delhi Contact: Q-1 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi 110 016. Ph: 26569023,
9968293978.
PRESS RELEASE
FOREST RIGHTS DHARNA SUCCESSFUL IN FIRST DAYS NCP LEADER PA SANGMA
WRITES TO PRIME MINISTER IN SUPPORT OF FOREST RIGHTS BILL AND JPC REPORT
Other Political Leaders Also Express Support
In its first two days, the forest rights dharna has been a success,
with representative from five States (Maharashtra, Nagar Haveli,
Gujarat, Rajashtan, and Tamil Nadu) now present and other States
arriving in the coming days.
Yesterday, the dharna also received the good news that former Lok Sabha
Speaker PA Sangma, General Secretary of the Nationalist Congress Party,
has written to the Prime Minister demanding that the forest rights Bill
be passed. Saying that this legislation "should not be allowed to be
sabotaged or undermined due to misplaced concerns", Shri Sangma called
on the government to accept the report of the Joint Parliamentary
Committee, which he said "has done an excellent,
objective and comprehensive job."
Shri Sangma specifically reported four of the key recommendations of
the JPC and strongly objected to the government's stand on rejecting
non-ST forest dwellers (some groups of which the JPC had recommended
for inclusion) and the government's persistence with a cutoff date of
1980. He said the former amounted to "unfair discrimination." Recent
rumoured proposals of two Bills, one for SC's and one for ST's, would
lead to "competitive politics around forest rights" and "damage both
forests and tribals." He concluded by saying that, now that the JPC
has completed its work, he "fails to understand why the Bill should now be further delayed."
Shri Faggan Khulaste of the Bharatiya Janata Party also visited the
dharna yesterday to express his strong support for the cause of the
forest dwellers and the tribals and their struggle for a just and
effective forest rights Bill. Shri Baba Panchsare of the Dalit Adivasi
Sangharsh Samiti (affiliated to the All India Forward Bloc) also
visited the dharna on Wednesday to declare his solidarity.
The dharna received these good news with great enthusiasm. More people
are arriving from Tamil Nadu and Chattisgarh in the coming days. The
people are preparing for the large rally planned for the 29th, when
12,000 to 15,000 people are expected to march in Delhi, and
around 80,000 in simultaneous demonstrations in Mumbai, Bhubaneshwar, Ranchi, Chennai and Bangalore.
A copy of Shri Sangma's letter is attached.
LETTER OF SHRI P.A. SANGMA
Member, Lok Sabha
General Secretary, Nationalist Congress Party
To:
Dr. Manmohan Singh
Hon'ble Prime Minister of India
Sub:- Concerns regarding government's position on Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005
Dear Sir,
I am writing in connection with the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition
of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005, one of the most historic initiatives
undertaken by our UPA government. This initiative is further in
fulfillment of a promise made in the CMP.
Sir, the draft Bill as tabled in Parliament was referred to a Joint
Parliamentary Committee in December 2005. The JPC, chaired by Shri
Kishore Chandra Deo of the Congress party, undertook a detailed
consideration of the Bill and gave a unanimous report in May of this
year with more than thirty recommendations. Sir, these are key
recommendations and I believe that the JPC has done an excellent,
objective and comprehensive job.
It is in this context that I am very disturbed to hear repeated
reports from the press, my fellow Members of Parliament and other
parties that sections in the government are fiercely opposed to the
JPC's recommendations and are intent on rejecting them. Specifically
four important recommendations are being opposed: empowerment of the
gram sabha in the process of decision-making over rights; safeguards
for resettlement of forest dwellers; changing the 1980 cutoff date; and
inclusion of non-ST's in the ambit of the Bill.
Sir, the first of these recommendations is a Constitutional
requirement in Scheduled Areas under the Panchayats (Extension to
Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, and moreover would guarantee transparency
and accountability in the rights recognition process. Retaining the
original Bill's provisions would lead to denial of rights and
corruption. The second of these matters has already been de facto
accepted by the government in the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act
of this year, so once again I cannot see why it should now be opposed.
The remaining two matters are even more serious, particularly the
1980 cutoff date. This will lead to massive evictions across the
country given the enormous amount of displacement, numbers of evictions
etc. that have happened in the 26 years since that date. An entire
generation has been born and come of age in that time. Further it is
entirely arbitrary to hold that those who have been occupying and
cultivating land since after 1980 should not have their rights
recognized but that 11 lakh hectares of forest land should allowed to
be diverted for mining and industry in the same period. I am told
further that the argument is being made that the Supreme Court is being
seen as a threat to changing the 1980 date; sir, we are a democracy and
cannot allow the Supreme Court to dictate to us on policy decisions
which belong to the domain of Parliament. A recent cutoff date is the
only just option.
I also support the inclusion of non-ST's in the manner that the JPC
has recommended. While tribals are the original forest dwellers, one
cannot ignore the large population of non-ST forest dwellers in many
States who have resided in the forest and on their lands for
generations. These people also have rights and their claims cannot be
ignored. Therefore, the JPC had recommended that those who have lived
in the forest for three generations should have their rights
recognized, as well as those who have been forced into forest land by
the government (such as forest villages, repatriates or displaced
people). Not including these people amounts to unfair discrimination.
Finally, on this last issue I am particularly disturbed to hear
rumours that the government is intent either on excluding non-ST's, on
potentially drafting a separate legislation for SC's alone, leaving
non-ST rights to be handled by executive orders, etc. Sir, these are
all ideas that would result in a great deal of confusion on the ground,
with a multiplicity of authorities. The notion of a separate
legislation for SC's in particular would create a very dangerous
precedent of deciding forest rights on the basis of caste identity,
which in turn could lead to competitive politics around demanding
forest rights. This would damage both the forests and the tribals.
Sir, there is growing discontent and unrest in forest and tribal
areas across India due to the continued delay of the government in
bringing this Bill. The JPC has studied the Bill and heard all
parties; one fails to understand why the Bill should now be further
delayed. I am sure your office and the concerned Ministries will take
these matters into consideration when coming to a decision. This
legislation is a matter of settling a historical injustice committed
against the poorest people of our country. It should not be allowed to
be sabotaged or undermined due to misplaced concerns.
From: Campaign for Survival and Dignity <forestcampaignnews@...
> Subject: Press Release: Forest Rights Dharna Begins Tomorrow
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:44:38 IST
CAMPAIGN FOR SURVIVAL AND DIGNITY National Convenor: Pradip Prabhu, 3, Yezdeh Behram, Kati, Malyan,
Dahanu Rd. 401602. Delhi Contact: SRUTI, Q-1 Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi 110 016. Ph:
9968293978, 26569023.
PRESS RELEASE
TRIBALS AND FOREST DWELLERS BEGIN FOREST RIGHTS DHARNA TOMORROW
NATIONAL DEMONSTRATIONS PLANNED FOR 29TH
Tomorrow,
on the first day of the Parliament session, tribals and forest dwellers
from Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Nagar Haveli, Tamil Nadu, Orissa,
Jharkhand, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Chattisgarh and Karnataka will
begin a dharna to demand the immediate passage of a just and effective
legislation for the recognition of the rights of forest dwelling
communities.
For too long, this government has sat on the Scheduled Tribes
(Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005, and the report of the Joint Parliamentary
Committee that not only endorsed the Bill but recommended a number of
significant changes that would democratise the
Bill. The government is instead intent on retaining a Bill that
would have clauses that would result in massive corruption, abuse of
power and forest destruction, all while claiming that the government is concerned about the environment.
Even as it resists this Bill in the name of the environment,
the government passes policies like the new Environmental Impact
Assessment
notification, policies for privatisation of forests and the Special
Economic Zones Act all of which will result in massive
forest and environmental destruction.
The government has
shown that it cares neither for the environment nor for forest
dwellers' rights only for the power of money and multinational corporations.
The
dharna will demand the immediate passage of this legislation with the
required amendments. We also demand the repeal of these and other
policies that will result in massive environmental damage and the loss
of our homelands.
On November 29th, in support of these same demands, mass
demonstrations will be held in Delhi, Mumbai, Ranchi, Bhubaneshwar,
Bangalore and Chennai. More than 80,000 people are expected to
participate.
On behalf of the Convening Collective
Bharat Jan Andolan,
National Front for Tribal Self Rule, Jangal Adhikar Sangharsh Samiti
(Mah), Adivasi Mahasabha (Guj), Adivasi Jangal
Janjeevan Andolan (D&NH), Jangal Jameen Jan Andolan (Raj), National
Forum of Forest Peoples and Forest Workers, Madhya Pradesh Van Adhikar
Abhiyan (MP), Jan Shakti Sanghatan (Chat), Peoples Alliance for
Livelihood Rights, Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha, Orissa Jan Sangharsh
Morcha, Campaign for Survival & Dignity (Ori), Orissa Adivasi
Manch, Orissa Jan Adhikar Morcha, Adivasi Aikya Vedike (AP), Budakattu
Krishikara Sangha (Kar), Campaign for Survival and Dignity TN, Bharat
Jan Andolan (Jhar).
Justice for Afzal Guru
"Afzal Guru's hanging will reinforce the perception of two sets of
legal norms prevalent in
a society polarising fast on communal lines."
To find out more about the Afzal Guru case go to this link:
http://www.justiceforafzalguru.org
ACTION ALERT
**** Sign Our Open Letters ****
- Letter to the Indian President
http://www.petitiononline.com/ekta1/petition.html
To read and endorse this letter click the link above.
- Letter the Indian National Human Rights Commission (NHRC.)
http://justiceforafzalguru.org/private/nhrc2.html
To read this letter, click the link above.
You can also send endorsments for both the letters to:
admin@...
Partial list of endorsors so far include Anand Patwardhan, Noam
Chomsky, S. A. R. Geelani,
Ved Bhasin, Ziauddin Sardar and Praful Bidwai.
Send in your endorsments today!
Sandeep
So, although with several conditions, the CEC has suggested a go ahead for Polavaram. In the bargain, a huge area will go for 'compensatory afforestation'; a large reserve forest area will be added to the wildlife sanctuary and the whole area converted into a national park after throwing out some additional 'scattered' villages, and it is unclear which area will be used for R&R. In sum, the villagers will not only get displaced but will lose access to the additional forest area converted into a national park and people in the region will lose access to the area allocated for R & R, thereby fuelling resentment against the displaced rehabilitated there.
Shouldn't some of the petitioners now go to the Supreme Court against the CEC decision of recommending that an enlarged sanctuary be converted into a national park? Surely there need to be more rational criteria for recommending such a change as it will involve additional displacement and loss of access to common pool forest resources for a population already traumatised with the threat of impending displacement. What also needs to be looked into is which land has been identified for 'compensatory afforestation' and what it's current uses are.
As pointed out by Down to Earth, the same happened in the case of Subansiri dam in Arunachal Pradesh where declaration of the catchment of the dam as a national park led to more displacement than the dam itself!
Subject: [polavaram] Central Empowered Committee Order
Dear all
Please find in attachment the CEC (Central Empowered Committee) recommentdation on Polavaram (Indira Sagar Dam). And also my 2nd affidavit before the committee.
Regards,
P.Sivaramakrishna
SAKTI A voluntary organization working for the welfare of tribals and conservation of natural resources
Dr.P.Sivaramakrishna & P.Sarada Devi, 30
Sponsored Link