All Nuvi's other than the 350 display breadcrumb trails for mobile APRS
stations.  ONLY the Nuvi 350 does it "right" as we APRS users would
consider it.  The wiki does give you the full details.

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Owner/operator of two T2-135/Nuvi 350s combinations

Paul Vittorino wrote:
>
>
> I would point you to the wiki page:
> <http://wiki.argentdata.com/index.php/Garmin_FMI>.
>
> Paul
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:47 AM, ww5rm <ww5rm@...
> <mailto:ww5rm@...>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     Has anyone had any experience with the Garmin Nuvi 205 and Fleet
>     Management? Does it output like the Nuvi 350?
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Randall
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------
>
>     Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>        tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>     <mailto:tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>

You don't use connected mode packet to send commands to the T2, you use
APRS messages.

Scott

dhondt wrote:
>
>
> hello, I'm unable to connect to digipeater ot2m by RF (no problem with
> cable). I send SABM frame, but no answer. my call f4aii Digicall f4aii-3
> My call is authorized in the list.
> I use AGW terminal.
>
> Have you an idea of the problem?
> thanks
>
> f4aii Jean Charles
>
>

Thank you both for your fast replies.

I wanted to verify that my 22 year old Icom-02AT fit under the statement of
'Most HT's by Icom'.....

My luck doesn't usually go that way !!!

Again thanks  !!!

DennisB   W7IME

It's still in beta.  The trouble with the new FMI 2.5 firmware is that
it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
names unless you select a station.  I haven't had any luck so far
getting anyone to change that.

FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
pretty cool.

Scott

Paul Vittorino wrote:
>
>
> When I added the nuvi 12xx and 13xx/14xx to the wiki, I specified that
> they did not support updating waypoints. This is not completely true.
> The new FMI protocol does support waypoint creation, but the T2 software
> with that support is still in beta (Scott: correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
> <ldeffenb@... <mailto:ldeffenb@...>> wrote:
>
>     All Nuvi's other than the 350 display breadcrumb trails for mobile APRS
>     stations.  ONLY the Nuvi 350 does it "right" as we APRS users would
>     consider it.  The wiki does give you the full details.
>
>     Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Owner/operator of two T2-135/Nuvi 350s combinations
>
>     Paul Vittorino wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > I would point you to the wiki page:
>      > <http://wiki.argentdata.com/index.php/Garmin_FMI
>     <http://wiki.argentdata.com/index.php/Garmin_FMI>>.
>      >
>      > Paul
>      >
>      > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:47 AM, ww5rm <ww5rm@...
>     <mailto:ww5rm@...>
>      > <mailto:ww5rm@... <mailto:ww5rm@...>>> wrote:
>      >
>      >     Hello,
>      >
>      >     Has anyone had any experience with the Garmin Nuvi 205 and Fleet
>      >     Management? Does it output like the Nuvi 350?
>      >
>      >     Thanks
>      >
>      >     Randall
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >     ------------------------------------
>      >
>      >     Yahoo! Groups Links
>      >
>      >
>      >        tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>     <mailto:tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>
>      >     <mailto:tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>     <mailto:tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>>
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------
>
>     Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>        (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>        tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>     <mailto:tracker2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com>
>
>
>
>

Scott Miller wrote:
> it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
> names unless you select a station.  I haven't had any luck so far
> getting anyone to change that.
>
> FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
> pretty cool.
>

So, two steps backwards and one step forward at this point?

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ

It does.  I have one happily working..

p

Quoting DennisB <dennisb@...>:

> Thank you both for your fast replies.
>
> I wanted to verify that my 22 year old Icom-02AT fit under the
> statement of 'Most HT's by Icom'.....
>
> My luck doesn't usually go that way !!!
>
> Again thanks  !!!
>
> DennisB   W7IME
>

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
<ldeffenb@...> wrote:

> All Nuvi's other than the 350 display breadcrumb trails for mobile APRS
> stations.  ONLY the Nuvi 350 does it "right" as we APRS users would
> consider it.  The wiki does give you the full details.

I even added pretty colours to the wiki table so it's easier to
identify which units are good...

Green is proper support, yellow is partial support, and red is no support...

Not much green in the table, so people should get the concept that the
Nuvi 350 is the beast to use.

James
VE6SRV

> from the tip); white goes to the second, and red goes to the tip. So my
> question is which wire is for the ground; black or blue?

On recent Yaesu cables, blue.  The factory switched it for some reason.
   And in fact, they may both be ground.

Scott

Hi Craig,

What address are you sending messages to?  other callsigns or internet
addresses?

Do you have a digipeater in the area set up to accept messages?

73 de kevin/NB7O


--- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, Craig Leventhal <craigjl1965@...> wrote:
>
> I have the Tracker2 model OT2m connected to a Garmin Nuvi 350 with a FMI
cable, and the Tracker2 is hooked to a Radio Shack HTX-252. The Nuvi 350 is in
Fleet mode. The Tracker is set to use Port A, 9600 Baud, Garmin Mode. I'm seeing
my station on aprs.fi  (KI6WLP-2) and the Nuvi 350 seems to be talking to the
Tracker2, I can send the --version command and I get a message back with the
version number on the Nuvi 350, BUT I can't seem to be able to send nor receive
APRS messages.
>
> Is there some settings that I can check or need to be change on the Tracker2
or the Nuvi 350 to get APRS messaging function working?
>
>
> 73
>
> Craig - KI6WLP
>

Is there a place to find out the latest available build number for the
T2-135 firmware without hooking up to the unit and firing up the
configuration program?  I'm trying to determine if it's worth pulling my
mobiles for an update.  Their version command reports Build 54746.

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - T2-135s as KJ4ERJ-9 and KJ4OVQ-9

I was trying to send to another station I had setup for testing in the same
room.
The Tracker2 is is set for KI6WLP-2 and I was trying to send to a test
stations KI6WLP-1 and KI6WLP-3

The second test staion is a Yaesu VX-8R hooked to a another brand Tracker. I
know the second Tracker works because it shows up on aprs.fi

KI6WLP-1 is the ID assigned to another brand of tracker which is hooked to
a laptop running APRSIS32, I also had the APRSIS32 software set for KI6WLP-3.

I do see other stations showing up on the Nuvi 350 and they're in the
"Favorites" list. 
I tried send using the following:

-KI6WLP-1 TEST

and also

-KI6WLP-3 TEST

Also when the APRSIS32 software on the laptop is in the RF mode is can see other
APRS station through the VX-8R, Tracker, and to the laptop. I think maybe once I
was able to send from the laptop using RF mode to the Tracker2 and Nuvi 350.

I thought I can send directly to another APRS station without going through a
digipeater, am I mistaken?
If they're in the same room for testing, could that be causing a problem?

Craig - KI6WLP

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Craig Leventhal <craigjl1965@...> wrote:

> -KI6WLP-1 TEST

Looks like you are sending the message properly.

> I thought I can send directly to another APRS station without
> going through a digipeater, am I mistaken?

You're good... you should be on 144.390 simplex, direct communication
is not a problem.

> If they're in the same room for testing, could that be causing a problem?

It shouldn't be a problem... are you decoding the other stations
reliably on each station? If you aren't able to decode positions
reliably, then I'd look at modulation levels... If you don't get
reliable positions, you won't get reliable messaging.

James
VE6SRV

OK, thanks, i tryed same as TNC2!! with APRS message it's OK

JCH


--- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, Scott Miller <scott@...> wrote:
>
> You don't use connected mode packet to send commands to the T2, you use
> APRS messages.
>
> Scott
>
> dhondt wrote:
> >
> >
> > hello, I'm unable to connect to digipeater ot2m by RF (no problem with
> > cable). I send SABM frame, but no answer. my call f4aii Digicall f4aii-3
> > My call is authorized in the list.
> > I use AGW terminal.
> >
> > Have you an idea of the problem?
> > thanks
> >
> > f4aii Jean Charles
> >
> >
>

When the tracker tries to send do you hear the audio on the other
radio?  In the same room with a 10/25 watt radio you may be overloading
the receive on the other radio. Make sure that you're on low power, and
space the mobile radio's antenna further away, or put it on a dummy load.

p

On 3/9/2010 9:46 PM, Craig Leventhal wrote:
> I was trying to send to another station I had setup for testing in the same
room.
> The Tracker2 is is set for KI6WLP-2 and I was trying to send to a test
stations�KI6WLP-1 and KI6WLP-3
>
> The second test staion is a Yaesu VX-8R hooked to a another brand Tracker. I
know the�second Tracker works because it shows�up on aprs.fi
>
> KI6WLP-1 is the ID assigned to another brand of tracker�which is hooked to
a�laptop running APRSIS32,�I also had the APRSIS32 software set for
KI6WLP-3.
>
> I do see other stations showing up on the Nuvi 350 and they're in the
"Favorites" list.�
> I tried send using the following:
>
> -KI6WLP-1 TEST
>
> and also
>
> -KI6WLP-3 TEST
>
> Also when the APRSIS32 software on the laptop�is in the RF�mode is can see
other APRS station�through the VX-8R, Tracker, and to the laptop. I think
maybe once I was able to send from the laptop using RF mode to the Tracker2 and
Nuvi 350.
>
> I thought I can send directly to another APRS station without going through a
digipeater, am I mistaken?
> If they're in the same room for testing, could that be causing a problem?
>
> Craig - KI6WLP
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Can someone confirm that the "jumper" referred to in the profile switching
section of the configuration screen is actually pin 6 on the DB9 of the Alinco
DR135T rear connector once the T2-135 is installed.
Is it appropriate to pull pin 6 to ground as part of the profile selection
setup?
It appears to be so from the instruction manual of other tracker models, but the
T2-135 manual is a little slim on this point.
Don't want to let the smoke out!  Thanks
Terry

----- Original Message -----

From: micalite

To: tracker2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:04 AM

Subject: [tracker2] T2-135 profile switching question

 

Can someone confirm that the "jumper" referred to in the profile switching section of the configuration screen is actually pin 6 on the DB9 of the Alinco DR135T rear connector once the T2-135 is installed.
Is it appropriate to pull pin 6 to ground as part of the profile selection setup?
It appears to be so from the instruction manual of other tracker models, but the T2-135 manual is a little slim on this point.
Don't want to let the smoke out! Thanks
Terry

---

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.436 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2734 - Release Date: 03/10/10 07:33:00

Interesting!

I have a couple of 350 and I don't consider the way it handles Mobile stations
the ideal by a long shot!!!!! I am constantly bombarded with waypoints full all
the time because it adds a extra number to the end of the SSID each time it is
heard so to me the bread crumb trail seems to be a better way to go and waypoint
expiration sure would help eliminate running out of waypoints.

So tell me again how the 350 handles it properly? Because I don't see it that
way.

Randall



--- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@...>
wrote:
>
> Scott Miller wrote:
> > it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
> > names unless you select a station.  I haven't had any luck so far
> > getting anyone to change that.
> >
> > FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
> > pretty cool.
> >
>
> So, two steps backwards and one step forward at this point?
>
> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
>

ww5rm wrote:
> Interesting!
>
> I have a couple of 350 and I don't consider the way it handles Mobile stations
the ideal by a long shot!!!!! I am constantly bombarded with waypoints full all
the time because it adds a extra number to the end of the SSID each time it is
heard so to me the bread crumb trail seems to be a better way to go and waypoint
expiration sure would help eliminate running out of waypoints.
>
> So tell me again how the 350 handles it properly? Because I don't see it that
way.
>

My Nuvi 350 being fed by a T2-135 embedded in an Alinco DR-135 has a
single waypoint for each callsign-SSID.  When/if a position packet is
heard, the waypoint simply moves to the new location with no duplication
at all.  As I understand it, this is the only Nuvi to behave this way.
All of the other models do what you describe.

I don't have my firmware version handy here (it's in the mobile), but
are you sure you're running the latest firmware?  And (please don't take
offense) are you sure they're 350s?

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ


> Randall
>
>
>
> --- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@...>
wrote:
>
>> Scott Miller wrote:
>>
>>> it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
>>> names unless you select a station.  I haven't had any luck so far
>>> getting anyone to change that.
>>>
>>> FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
>>> pretty cool.
>>>
>>>
>> So, two steps backwards and one step forward at this point?
>>
>> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
>>
>>

----- Original Message -----

From: Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)

To: tracker2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:25 PM

Subject: Re: [tracker2] Re: Nuvi 205

 

ww5rm wrote:
> Interesting!
>
> I have a couple of 350 and I don't consider the way it handles Mobile stations the ideal by a long shot!!!!! I am constantly bombarded with waypoints full all the time because it adds a extra number to the end of the SSID each time it is heard so to me the bread crumb trail seems to be a better way to go and waypoint expiration sure would help eliminate running out of waypoints.
>
> So tell me again how the 350 handles it properly? Because I don't see it that way.
>

My Nuvi 350 being fed by a T2-135 embedded in an Alinco DR-135 has a
single waypoint for each callsign-SSID. When/if a position packet is
heard, the waypoint simply moves to the new location with no duplication
at all. As I understand it, this is the only Nuvi to behave this way.
All of the other models do what you describe.

I don't have my firmware version handy here (it's in the mobile), but
are you sure you're running the latest firmware? And (please don't take
offense) are you sure they're 350s?

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ

> Randall
>
>
>
> --- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@...> wrote:
>
>> Scott Miller wrote:
>>
>>> it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
>>> names unless you select a station. I haven't had any luck so far
>>> getting anyone to change that.
>>>
>>> FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
>>> pretty cool.
>>>
>>>
>> So, two steps backwards and one step forward at this point?
>>
>> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
>>
>>

---

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.436 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2734 - Release Date: 03/10/10 07:33:00

---

From: tracker2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:tracker2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ww5rm
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 16:17
To: tracker2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [tracker2] Re: Nuvi 205

 

Interesting!

I have a couple of 350 and I don't consider the way it handles Mobile stations the ideal by a long shot!!!!! I am constantly bombarded with waypoints full all the time because it adds a extra number to the end of the SSID each time it is heard so to me the bread crumb trail seems to be a better way to go and waypoint expiration sure would help eliminate running out of waypoints.

So tell me again how the 350 handles it properly? Because I don't see it that way.

Randall

--- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@...> wrote:
>
> Scott Miller wrote:
> > it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
> > names unless you select a station. I haven't had any luck so far
> > getting anyone to change that.
> >
> > FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
> > pretty cool.
> >
>
> So, two steps backwards and one step forward at this point?
>
> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
>

---

From: tracker2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:tracker2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Fred Hillhouse
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 17:19
To: tracker2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [tracker2] Re: Nuvi 205

 

If you have 50 stations come to the 350 then you use up 50 waypoints. But if those same 50 stations are moving and generate 10 position each, then you use up 500 waypoints. Clearly the first is best and that is where the 350 comes in. It does the first and is currently the best.

 

Ideal GPS, there is none, sorry!

 

I have recently added a laptop for mobile use and hopefully the waypoint issue will become moot for me. Check out APRSIS32 running on a ultra mobile. I have mine (not really an ultramobile but close) running and it is really awesome!

 

Best regards,

Fred

 

 

---

From: tracker2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:tracker2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ww5rm
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 16:17
To: tracker2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [tracker2] Re: Nuvi 205

 

Interesting!

I have a couple of 350 and I don't consider the way it handles Mobile stations the ideal by a long shot!!!!! I am constantly bombarded with waypoints full all the time because it adds a extra number to the end of the SSID each time it is heard so to me the bread crumb trail seems to be a better way to go and waypoint expiration sure would help eliminate running out of waypoints.

So tell me again how the 350 handles it properly? Because I don't see it that way.

Randall

--- In tracker2@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeffenb@...> wrote:
>
> Scott Miller wrote:
> > it doesn't automatically update the map, and it doesn't show waypoint
> > names unless you select a station. I haven't had any luck so far
> > getting anyone to change that.
> >
> > FMI 2.5 *does* allow automatic waypoint expiration, though, which is
> > pretty cool.
> >
>
> So, two steps backwards and one step forward at this point?
>
> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
>

Randall WW5RM wrote...

> I have a couple of 350 and I don't consider the way it handles
> Mobile stations the ideal by a long shot!!!!! I am constantly
> bombarded with waypoints full all the time because it adds
> a extra number to the end of the SSID each time it is heard
>so to me the bread crumb trail seems to be a better way to go
> and waypoint expiration sure would help eliminate running
> out of waypoints.

I have never heard of a Nuvi 350 connected with an FMI cable
to an OT2m / T2-135 / T2-301 doing what you are describing.
The Nuvi 350 properly handles waypoint upload... i.e. you don't
end up with a "breadcrumb" trail of waypoints with a different
number tagged on the end. The non 350 Nuvis give you the
breadcrumb trail as you are describing. I don't know if it's true,
but perhaps you have a very old firmware version in the 350
and it needs to be updated.

> So tell me again how the 350 handles it properly? Because
> I don't see it that way.

In my experience, it doesn't do what you are describing.

73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
--
"I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"

Hello, i connect ADS-WS1 to OT2m. On the APRS server(aprs.fi), i read this:

2010-03-11 06:10:52 UTC:
F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:T#251,149,170,251,000,000,00000010
2010-03-11 06:10:52 UTC:
F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:!4455.12N/00546.53E_014/001g...t030p000h55b10070T\
2WX [Rate limited (< 5 sec)]
2010-03-11 06:16:02 UTC: F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:!/7hdGOwm(_ st 13.3V 18C
2010-03-11 06:16:03 UTC:
F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:T#252,149,170,251,000,000,00000010
2010-03-11 06:16:03 UTC:
F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:!4455.12N/00546.53E_000/001g...t030p000h56b10069T\
2WX [Rate limited (< 5 sec)]
2010-03-11 06:21:15 UTC: F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:!/7hdGOwm(_ st 13.3V 18C
2010-03-11 06:21:15 UTC:
F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:T#253,149,170,251,000,000,00000010
2010-03-11 06:21:16 UTC:
F4AII-3>APOT21,WIDE1,qAR,F4AII:!4455.12N/00546.53E_000/000g...t030p000h57b10068T\
2WX [Rate limited (< 5 sec)]

the first frame generated by OT2m as blank, the second is the ADS-ws1 frame but
rejected.
i make a mistake or a bug?

thanks
f4aii Jean Charles

Hi All,

Has anyone tried the garmin nuvi 760 gps navigator?
The reason that I ask is that my dad has one of these devices and I
might see if I can get one of the FMI cables & try it out but I wanted
to know other peoples experience first with this model.
I understand that the nuvi 350 is the recommended one at the moment
but I am interested to hear others experiences until get the cable.

Thanks :-)
Andrew Gilbett
andrew.gilbett@...

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Andrew Gilbett
<andrew.gilbett@...> wrote:

> Has anyone tried the garmin nuvi 760 gps navigator?

Did you look at the Wiki page that lists the tested models?

http://wiki.argentdata.com/index.php/Garmin_FMI

> I understand that the nuvi 350 is the recommended one at the moment
> but I am interested to hear others experiences until get the cable.

That's why the table of tested models is posted.

James
VE6SRV

We are attempting to deploy a large number of weather stations using the T2-135
in an Alinco DR-135T. Since we are forced to use tactical call signs, we have
run into an issue. If the tracker 2 is configured with a tactical call in MYCALL
and the responsible station call sign is placed in the COMMENT, we get 2 packets
to fire at the INTERVAL time. One contains the position packet and the COMMENT
entry tagged on the end and the other packet contains the position packet with
the weather data tagged on the end. This creates more unneccesary overhead than
we care to load on the local packet network.

MYCALL must remain tactical since there are not enough SSID's to support a
single callsign. The tactical call sign is more descriptive of the location
which is an additional plus.

It would be nice to send an ID packet every 10 minutes with no routing path
specified and let the weather packets fire at the specified interval and path. I
am sure I can handle the ID through scripting, but eliminating the position
packet that does not contain the weather payload seems like a code modification.

If I could grab the formatted weather data via scripting it may be possible to
issue a BEACON command with position and weather payload. Then I could take
INTERVAL out of the picture.

Anybody have any suggestions?


Thanks and 73's,
Tim - N8DEU
Decatur, Alabama

Greetings,

I was just playing with the DAO digits in my wife's T2-135 (KJ4OVQ-9)
and it seems that the additional precision piece of the beacon isn't
coming out correctly.  From aprs.fi:

KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2:/152533h2759.80NS08039.53Wv251/000!W!

That !W! is supposed to have 2 more characters in there that are either
the raw additional digits (as implied by the T2-135 manual, "an extra
digit of precision") or a base-91-encoded pair of digits for each of the
lat and lon (per http://www.aprs.org/aprs12/datum.txt).

Is anyone else using this or did I not get enough configuration modified
to have it work properly?

The T2-135 is inside an Alinco DR-135 and is connected via an FMI cable
to a Nuvi 350.  Is it possible that FMI doesn't provide more than
hundredths of minutes of precision?

Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ

PS. I've turned DAO back off after this initial test, so you're looking
for 2 raw packets between 15:21:25 and 15:26:15 UTC at
http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&call=KJ4OVQ-9.  She's mobile today so these will
be rolling back in time, so here's the capture of the time range:

2010-03-12 15:20:42 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,K4RPT-5:/152056h2759.80NS08039.53Wv027/000
2010-03-12 15:21:23 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,KJ4ERJ-2::KJ4ERJ-AL:ack261
2010-03-12 15:21:25 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,K4RPT-5::KJ4ERJ-AL:DAO ON{ab
2010-03-12 15:23:15 UTC: KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,KJ4ERJ-2:>
Safari Van
2010-03-12 15:23:20 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,KJ4ERJ-2:/152332h2759.80NS08039.53Wv203/000!\
W!
2010-03-12 15:25:19 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,K4RPT-5:/152533h2759.80NS08039.53Wv251/000!W\
!
2010-03-12 15:26:12 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,KJ4ERJ-2::KJ4ERJ-AL:ack263
2010-03-12 15:26:15 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,K4RPT-5::KJ4ERJ-AL:DAO OFF{aa
[Duplicate message ID]
2010-03-12 15:27:21 UTC:
KJ4OVQ-9>APOT21,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2,qAR,K4RPT-5:/152735h2759.80NS08039.53Wv128/000