WW011@... wrote:
<< FTA = Failure To Appear  Complaint
The Warrant as I understand it was not (modified as it usually is by the
sheriffs office) as they usually are by procedure. I found no such complaint by
the DA for this FTA nor was their any actual warrant with an actual judges
signature in my file. I always thought a judge has to sign off on Any warrant.
Jurisdiction of the court to hear this VC 23109 (c) matter was fought by me all
through the 8 or 9 appearances by me and at #9, the judge entered a not guilty
plea 'for me.' I believe this is a violation in it self! >>

Only the Accused and counsel for the Accused can speak for the Accused.
A judge "entering" a plea "for" the Accused declares on the record that the
"judge" has declared the Accused to be incompetent, and/or the judge has openly
volunteered to be[come] counsel for the Accused...

A since-deceased friend back east had a judge so enter a false plea, to which my
friend thanked him for volunteered to act as counsel, then asked at what
date/time should they meet to discuss defense strategies (all right in the
court).  The judge blanched, stated the court would send a notice as to the next
court appearance date... which never ever was sent...

< Badger >

If you thought the IRS was a government agency, check these two items:

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/tax/1.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm

If you have a family Bible, place the information of your childs birth
in your family bible..

That is how it was done in the old days.

Anybody who needs a certificate to prove he has a baby in his household
has lost touch with reality.


>

Welcome to Tips & Tricks for going to court! I am delighted that you decided to
join my group. Some of you joined this group because you involved in a domestic
relations suit (divorce etc.), fighting the government over some issue (IRS,
zoning, traffic etc.), or you are going to court or would like to go court to
vindicate your rights and collect your damages. Others have joined this group
because they are either defending or expect to defend a suit.

It really does not matter why you are going to court; if you are going to court
a skill that will always greatly help you is the ability to skillfully do legal
research. In the law library there are books on every aspect of going to court.
There are books full of previous rulings by the courts in your jurisdiction.
There are books that tell all about how to do a divorce in your jurisdiction;
how to do a civil rights suit; how to defend and criminal or traffic case; how
to put on a trial. There are books full of sample forms that even describe how
to go about filling out the forms!

If you know how the law library works you can put your hands on the authority
and forms you need in minutes and put together paperwork that will have the
court thinking that you might be a lawyer. The ability to do legal research and
put together professional looking paperwork will be very intimidating to your
opponent; especially if your opponent has to hire and pay a lawyer to produce
paperwork that isn’t anyway near as good as yours. And then, there’s the
internet. If you know the right places to look on the internet, you will rarely
need to make a trip to the law library. Almost everything you need can be
brought straight to your home via your internet connection if you know where to
look.

I went into two different law libraries with a professional video producer and
produced a video that shows what these books look like and went into detail on
how they work. I offer that video at www.legalresearchvideo.com. You will have
to watch the video numerous times to glean from and use all of the information
on there. When you have mastered the information there it will take you a long
way to becoming effective in the court. As an additional bonus for purchasing
the video I offer 110 law related links that will help you do research and find
forms online.

Also at that web site I give a substantial discount on Blackstone’s Law Course
when you buy a legal research video. In 1914 this course was used to prepare
lawyers to pass the bar examine. This two volume law course is well organized,
comprehensive, and easy to read. After you have read it cover to cover there
will not be much about law that you didn’t know you didn’t know. You will have a
good understanding respecting what remedies are available in any situation and a
starting place for your research for situations you or your friends are involved
in.

If you master the ability to do legal research it will be very empowering to
you.

Again, thanks for participating in Tips & Tricks. Bear

As moderator and owner of Tips & Tricks for going to court, I would like to see
this group pointed more in the direction or practical litigation tactics. When
people write in with their problems asking for solutions I would like to see
more members of the group be able to offer practical, workable solutions that
have a likelihood of success based on first hand study and research instead of
old tired research that has been passed around so much it cannot be used in
court because it is so far removed from its origin. As I see it, if group
members would read law books and write book reports and post them to the group
based on the usable ideas they glean from them, not only would the reader
benefit, but group members as well. Below is the first list of books I would
like group members to check out of the library, buy through Amazon.com, or
acquire through interlibrary loans, read, and post book reports about. I would
like to see some lively discussion respecting these books and expect that we
will have some testimonies from people who have used what they learn both from
reading the books, and reading and writing the book reports posted to Tips &
Tricks. We don’t want to be like the dog who chases a car and when he catches it
doesn’t know what to do. Let us be like “wise virgins” and be prepared.

Most of us would like to win on our motions, so, here are some books on motions
practice:

Motions Practice and Persuasion by L. Ronald Jorgesen

This book teaches new lawyers how to effectively make and oppose motions and
help
experienced lawyers create more original and innovative work. It teaches the
basics of motion
practice, with a particular focus on the written motion and provides expert
advice on making
motions more persuasive. It discusses the tools of persuasion and the marshaling
of facts, law
and form to produce a winning motion. Instead of merely laying out the rules,
the book outlines
the analysis that the lawyer must make in writing and presenting a motion.

Motion Practice, Fourth Edition by Roger S. Haydock David F. Herr
       This comprehensive guide not only analyzes every applicable rule of civil
procedure, but also gives you practice-proven techniques for evaluating what
motions will work most effectively in each of your cases. From early pretrial
motions dealing with complaints and jurisdiction to appellate motion practice
for both victor and vanquished, Motion Practice, Fourth Edition shows you both
what is permissible and what is advisable in such aspects of motion practice as:
Formal requirements Strategic uses Use of supporting documents Effective
advocacy Persuasive oral argument Ethical issues The authors include a table of
deadlines affecting motions, along with sample forms and illustrative trial
examples.

A Guide To Motion Practice, by Samuel S Tripp

Motion Practice by David F Herr

Motions in Federal Court, Civil Practice by Shepards Mcgraw-Hill

Civil motion practice: How To Win Without Trying  by Marcus E Cohn

Whether we are the plaintiff or the defendant we need to know how to do cross
examination, so, here are some books on doing effective cross examination:

Cross-examination: Science & Techniques by Larry S. Pozner, Roger Dodd

The Art of Questioning : Thirty Maxims of Cross-Examination by Peter Megargee
Brown
       Step by step, how lawyers and nonlawyers alike can learn to ask the right
questions and get the answer they want, whether it’s in the courtroom or the
boardroom.

The Art of Cross-Examination by Francis L. Wellman
	 With the cross-examinations of important witnesses in some celebrated cases.
Wellman, one of the great nineteenth-century trial lawyers, made his reputation
in the musty New York
courtrooms of the 1880s and 1890s as assistant corporation counsel and assistant
district
attorney. In this volume he draws upon his own experiences and the brilliant
achievements of
other noted lawyers to explain and exemplify the principles of questioning. He
quotes
extensively from many memorable cases, utilizing them to illustrate both the
manner and matter
of cross-examination. He takes up the handling of the perjured witness and the
expert, he
underscores the importance of sequence, and he offers many insights into the
psychology of the
witness; showing that knowing when to elicit information, and when not to, is
critical to the
artistry of the advocate.

Cross-Examination: The Comprehensive Guide for Experts by Steven Babitsky, James
J., Jr. Mangraviti
       The ultimate measure of every expert is how well the expert performs
during cross-examination. SEAK’s new text, Cross-Examination: The Comprehensive
Guide For Experts will help experts quickly and efficiently master the art of
responding to each and every cross-examination question truthfully and artfully.
Experts will learn how to prepare for, anticipate, recognize, and effectively
deal with counsel
       About the Author Steven Babitsky and James J. Mangraviti, Jr. are the
nation's leading and most prolific authors and trainers on expert witness
issues. They are both former trial lawyers whose past texts include: How To
Excel During Cross-Examination: Techniques for Experts that Work, How To Excel
During Depositions: Techniques for Experts that Work, and The Comprehensive
Forensic Services Manual: The Essential Resources for all Experts. Attorneys
Babitsky and Mangraviti have trained thousands of experts on the skills needed
to be more effective and better assist the trier of fact.

Here are some books on how to make effective closing arguments:

Closing Arguments -- by Frederick Busch;

Ladies And Gentlemen Of The Jury: Greatest Closing Arguments In Modern Law -- by
Michael
S. Lief

In the Interest of Justice : Great Opening and Closing Arguments of the Last 100
Years by Joel
Seidemann

Closing Arguments: The Last Battle by Mike Papantonio, Fred Levin, Martin Levin

There are even books on jurisdiction:

Federal Jurisdiction (Introduction to Law)  by Erwin Chemerinsky
	 A Review: I'm a very average law student, and my federal courts class was
stacked with the top 2nd and 3rd year students in my school. Despite this, I got
the highest grade in the class. The reason...this book. This single most
impressive book I have encountered in 3 years of law school. And if you plan to
practice in the federal court system, this book is essential. Buy it.

The Practice And Jurisdiction Of The Court Of Admiralty: In Three Parts by John
E. Hall

A Treatise on the Law of Lis Pendens: Or the Effect of Jurisdiction upon
Property Involved in
Suit by John I. Bennett

Let’s study up on trial tactics:

The Trial Lawyers : The Nation's Top Litigators Tell How They Win by Emily
Couric

The Underground Lawyer by Michael Louis Minns

Trial : Theories, Tactics, Techniques by Roger S. Haydock, John Sonsteng

Trial tactics;: A book of suggestions on the trial of cases, containing
pertinent addresses by many well-known trial experts by Asher L Cornelius

Trial tactics and methods by Robert E Keeton

Successful trial tactics by Aaron Smith Cutler

Basic expressions for trial lawyers: Supplement to Keeton, Trial tactics and
methods by Robert
E Keeton

Eyewitness Testimony Strategies and Tactics/With Supplement: Strategies and
Tactics by
William Carroll, Edward Arnolds

Questioning Techniques and Tactics by Jeffrey L. Kestler

Dombroff on Unfair Tactics by Mark A. Dombroff

File        : dele Tips Rules.rtf
Description : Tips & Tricks Rules

meritorius defences examples:
accord and satisfaction
failure of consideration
failure to tender
failure to meet and fulfill conditions precedent

>

No such certificate is needed to obtain a passport. Proof of origin is
what is needed. How are matters proved ? By testimony. Testimony by the
mother, or another competent witness to the birth, duly written,
witnessed, affirmed or given under oath, and recorded in a public office
of government will be good and sufficient proof. How are certificates
created except by testimony ? To receive money directly from Government
requires a Social Security Account Number and to obtain that requires a
certificate of birth, although affidavits have been substituted in the
past. They created a birth certificate for my grandmother in her 60's.

This is how it was done by dissenters to the establishment of
religion
  in England in the old days.
  Among whom were quakers, who were unchurched.
  There were more quakers present at the drafting of this
Constitution
  than any other christian sect.  This Constitution was intended for
  religious people.
  The family Bible entry is still recognized as evidence of origin
and woe
  to us, the day it is not.

In any contested custody matter, allegations of child
abuse/neglect, I suggest that asking if there is any
chance of Native American heritage, even if they don't
know too much about it or what tribe may be involved.


Don't leave it to the people bringing the petition to
prove heritage. They are not motivated to do that
because there are extra protections.  There is a DNA
test that runs about $350.00 is all that can show
racial markers even if the ancestory search isn't
completed. That's a great way to get the federal
protections to kick in right there.  Don't just look
at the person and think, blond hair, complection isn't
dark enough, no way.  With ractial mixing think again.
Way.

I knew all that genetics I took in college would come
in handy.  Recent genetic studies show that Puerto
Ricans often have about 1/4 to 1/2 of Tainos decent.
That's Native American and in these cases, wow, don't
just assume Hispanic.

History books in the US aren't always accurate.  Did
Columbus discover America? He actually landed on the
island of Hispaniola, now it's Haiti and the Dominican
Republic.  Who was on the ships with Columbus? Well,
since they thought that the earth was flat and that
the ships were destined to fall off the edge of the
earth. the only people that were willing to sail to
their potential death were those that were given the
choice, prison or a boat ride with Columbus.  There
weren't any women along for the ride, so it's not
rocket science to figure out that those Spaniards were
having their babies with the locals on the island.

That band wasn't just on that island and it actually
was all through the islands there including islands
that later became commonwealths of the US, yup Puerto
Rico.  In our very mobile society, there is now a
group that doesn't even know they are a group, urban
indians.

In Michigan, I have found a wonderful federally funded
legal group called the Michigan Indian Legal Service
with offices in Lansing and Traverse City.  They are
available not only to individuals, but to help lawyers
to understand protections and to use them such as
ICWA.  The best part, free of charge to either consult
with the lawyer on the case or jump on board with
defending the case.

What lawyer doesn't like winning, especially when it's
for the client wearing the white hat?  I just got
interested in this about a year ago and read every
state and federal manual, read all the public health
laws (it's not just state, federal), and realized to
understand this fully, you follow the money stream.
The funding used for investigation of child protection
and since there is some crossing into custody matters
and you guessed it, the judiciary now by a government
agency, the funding is CAPTA which is right out of the
Social Security Trust.  Look at the requirements
attatched to it called "reasonable efforts" to find
out  the hoops that no one wants the lawyers or courts
to figure out haven't been jumped through by any state
worker.

I see a practice too often where qualifying the
witness is just skipped in cases involving some
petition brought by a state worker for a child
protection case. Don't make that mistake. Qualify the
witness. Wait till you find out how unqualified most
of them really are.  I went through the entire list of
5,000 employees with another clinician for one of the
state senators (I do a lot on the state/federal level
to work on legal reforms).  I had already started to
check licenses locally as an adjuct professor for a
teaching hospital for all the major universities, the
unprofessional conduct and the jogging suits in court
made me wonder, who passed these people? The data came
up with the most astounding figures of all with data
to back it.  Only one out of 10 had a license in
anything, usually a certified nurses aid (6 weeks of
training) or an EMT if they had a license at all.

What does all this mean to lawyers defending their
clients?  This is the practice of forensic social work
or forensic psychology. It takes 6 years in college
and 3 practicuums, 2 years post master's clinical
supervision by someone who is a MSW/LSW at the minimum
or a PhD in psychology.  That means that petition
making allegations can be tossed.  No healthcare
license (yes, you can and should make sure you look on
the state healthcare licensing web site and if you
can't find them, make them produce it with a career
vita, proof of proper education.  No license at that
level, that means that's not a person qualified to
give an opinion period, they aren't expert, you are
looking at probably a high school graduate with 6
weeks of training from some other unlicensed person on
how we do it (healthcare fraud) to get at this funding
stream (CAPTA).

I suggest you go out and find your own expert witness,
someone that maybe admires the lawyers that will take
on a larger adversary for the right reasons.  Yes, it
can be at court expense and some of the expert
witnesses do it without that much worry about getting
paid because it all comes out in the wash with higher
profile and wealthier clients that are referred.

Besides, for me it's just become fun for me to warn
the state workers that I already checked licensure
that morning, the lawyer for the defense knows too and
will be qualifying the witness including you, but
we'll do it under oath.  I then tell them that you'll
be asked to prove your qualifications. I tell them
that I'll see to it that if they get on that stand,
their petition will be tossed and I will ask that they
be charged with a felony for practicing without a
license, in  violation of public health laws going
back to 1978 in this state.  After they are found to
be unqualified,they won't be entering their
unqualified opinions on the record.  I  the tell them
I already know you have no more qualifications than
the guy riding the back of the trash truck in my
neighborhood.
I also point out that billing like you have a MSW/LLP
and you have nothing remotely resembling an education
is considered health care fraud and I'll turn it over
to the OIG for the feds too.  The money you collected
thus far is then, return to sender and then all the
billings will be pulled and it will start an
investigation.

When they come up with the silly "I'm not aware that
we have to have a license" because we don't call
ourselves in our job titles "social worker" or
"psychologist".  I tell them "you do drive a state
car, correct?"  They look puzzled and say yes.  I come
back with "It doesn't say driver in your title either.
  If you drive without a license, red cross 10 people,
kill af few and run into the side of the defendant's
lawyer's house, do you really think that you can use
this illogical explanation for breaking the law?"

It's fun for me to see them cower in the corner,
whisper to one another and ask for an adjournment. I
love it when lawyers get excited and say, you're
kidding, I can win this case?

I make formal reports to the court tying all the rules
and laws in.  It's worth the money and effort to avoid
the "diagnosing for dollars" contractors they will try
to steer your clients to. Also, federal rules are much
more stringent about who even qualifies to give expert
opinion on native american cases as well as yes, your
client can pick and doesn't have to go to some
secular, too involved in making money by extending the
case forever contractor.

Constitutional violations can also be raised.
Handbooks for lawyers, judges regarding this can be
found at:   "Connecticut DCF Watch"
<ctdcfwatch@....  If there is more interest in
the specific to native american protections, please
ask. Yes, I win with the families and tribes, so far
every time.
Cathy Halash




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

My dad was born before brith certiicates and used
simple letters/affidavits of some relatives to
obtain passport was back in '60's.
Oath on passport is another issue to overcome/alter.

hobot

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kouri/jim49.htm




My Visit to The Minutemen HQ in Arizona
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd188.htm
by Devvy Kidd

Myth vs Fact of Illegal Immigration
http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty149.htm
by Frosty Wooldridge

Underlying Agenda of Illegals Deceitful
http://www.newswithviews.com/metcalf/metcalf178.htm
by Geoff Metcalf

----- Original Message -----

From: Lenny VanDerPloeg

To: Tips_and_Tricks@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 5:25 PM

Subject: [tips_and_tricks] affidavit of Meritorious defense

Could someone please explain to me in simple terms what a Meritorious defense is?

I filed a motion for relief from judgement because i was not served.And have 5 affidavits.

The judge said I need to file a affidavit of meritorious defense and adjured it 2 weeks,,,I could not figure it out so I ammended the motion and based it on Jurisdiction ,which the MCR state I dont need the affidavit,,,the judge  said I still need the affidavit,,LIKE HE SAID,,and adjured it a week so I can write this ,,,this is where I am stuck?

What is it and whats it contain?

ANy help would be apprecitated

Thank you

Lenny

 

Ps I am in Michigan

The problem is that a certificate may be needed by the child in the future, for example, getting a passport.

 

My letter to my friend, Dr. Ward Franklin  Dean,
@ R3R169787,  P.O. Box 17800,
Pensacola FL 32522-7789
came back marked "No longer at This Address".

Does anyone know of his whereabouts and address now?

Sterling Wayne Wyatt

Your state should have in effect an affidavit of fact
covering a religious objection to the use of the
number as an identifier. Call or write your Secretary
of State's Office in the State capital and ask them if
they have any such program available.



--- pireleif88@... wrote:

>
> Can anyone procedurally describe what steps (if any)
> are needed to be taken
> in order for one to establish themseeelves an
> entirely NEW personal (numeric
> ID) profile, being it is now required.
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Hi All,

Recently I joined this list. I have been browsing the message archives and
this is my first post here. Greetings to all, but please bear with me if I
botch any list rules or guidelines.

I'd like to engage a discussion about authenticating evidence with respect
to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRoE). All evidence must be authenticated
in one manner or another. Some forms of evidence are self-authenticating
pursuant to Rule 902. Alternately, all other forms of evidence are not
self-authenticating and controlled under Rule 901.

Generally, authentication is performed by a competent fact witness with
personal knowledge (Rule 602). But can evidence be authenticated without a
competent fact witness? If so, what are those guidelines?

I'm thinking about the IRS administrative and litigation process. For many
people the evidence trail typically begins with a W-2 or 1099 information
return. Those documents are not signed under penalties of perjury pursuant
to section 6065 of the IRC, but an accompanying W-3 or 1096 transmittal
form provides that jurat. Interestingly, however, after the IRS clerks
enter into the computer the information from these information returns, the
information returns and transmittal forms disappear. Yes, the IRS folks
seem to intentionally destroy evidence.

With any subsequent contact with IRS bureaucrats, all an alleged taxpayer
will see are computer print-outs of these information returns, never to see
the actual original documents. A GAO report from 1996 and a recent report
from only a couple of months ago reveals that the IRS folks have no way of
authenticating or securing their computer data. Additionally, the original
section 6065 jurat no longer exists. That would seem to indicate that these
computer print-outs cannot be used as admissible evidence.

Should things get interesting during any tax dispute, the IRS folks merely
demand that the original payer print a facsimile copy of the original W-2
or 1099. However, there will be no attached facsimile transmittal form with
a signed jurat. Thus, there again are no signatures to satisfy section 6065
and once again a problem seems to exist with respect to authenticating the
facsimile documents. Of course, at a hearing or trial the IRS folks could
authenticate the information return through verbal testimony of the payer,
but often that never happens.

Another trick the IRS folks will perform is to request copies of canceled
checks. The sums of those canceled checks likely will match the amount
reported in the information returns. With the computer print-out, the
facsimile information returns, and the sum of the canceled checks, there
seems to be three points to define the line. However, the IRS attorney or
the hearing officer cannot act as a material witness with respect to those
documents and possess no standing to provide testimony on behalf of other
potential witnesses. Therefore, without a competent witness, are the copies
of canceled checks admissible evidence?

Rule 803(6) is a hearsay exception rule for records created in the normal
course of business. But Rule 803(6) requires the documents be authenticated
by the record custodian or other qualified witness (typically a
supervisor). The documents are not self-authenticating.

Rules 1002 and 1003 allow for duplicate documents if reasonable evidence
can be submitted that the original documents no longer exist, but do those
rules allow bypassing the authentication process demanded of the original
documents? Probably not, but I am unsure.

Rule 903 allows for signed documents to be admitted without verbal
testimony, but if the jurats no longer exist can those documents be
admitted under Rule 903? Probably not, but I am unsure.

Are any of these documents admissible as evidence if there are no competent
witnesses or jurats available to authenticate those documents? Will a
hearing officer, judge, or IRS attorney find a loophole in the Rules to get
those documents admitted as evidence?

A similar observation appears with documents generated within the IRS. A
couple of years after the RRA of 1998, to satisfy the arguable intent of
section 6020(b), the IRS folks abandoned their infamous section 6020(b)
"dummy returns" and began completing Form 4549 "Income Tax Examination
Changes." Tax court judges accept the Form 4549 as satisfying the intent of
section 6020(b), but doing so requires first depending upon information
returns as being presumptively correct. Yet, although this Form 4549 is
electronically subscribed, the signature is not under the penalties of
perjury nor is the information attested to being true, complete, and
correct. A judge likely will dismiss that latter challenge because if the
information return is presumptively correct, then the remainder of the
calculations is basically a plug-and-chug exercise from the existing tax
tables and exemptions. But is this Form 4549 admissible as evidence if the
signer of that form does not appear at a hearing or trial to authenticate
the document and information and there is no signature under penalties of
perjury?

Where all of these leads, of course, is if one can successfully challenge
the authentication of these information returns and documents, then the IRS
folks possess no evidence that is admissible. Without admissible evidence
they have no case. 30-day and 90-day letters become voidable. Etc. I'm far
too cynical that a judge or hearing officer would allow a tax case to
collapse based upon challenges of authenticating evidence. To do so would
open the door to collapsing the entire house of cards. Still, I'd like to
hear ideas and opinions from all of you regarding the authenticating
process and challenges that arguably could succeed.

Thanks much.

My problem with the letter is that it misrepresents the law in order to
achieve a result. When we do that, we put ourselves in the same camp as
the IRS.
=======================

> And as for Garys claim of BS on my letter to the Dr... It worked for me
> as I had "high hopes" and a dammit attitude! If you don't like it
> delete it > and I will take my toys and go home!
>




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.1/328 - Release Date: 5/1/2006

My letter to my friend, Dr. Ward Franklin  Dean, 
@ R3R169787,  P.O. Box 17800, 
Pensacola FL 32522-7789 
came back marked "No longer at This Address".

Does anyone know of his whereabouts and address now?

Sterling Wayne Wyatt

When I received a response from him, he was here, but stated he was being
moved for a pych evalutation.

Dr. Ward Dean M-10
c/o Santa Rosa Criminal Justice Facility
P.O Box 7129
Milton, Florida 32572-7129

<html><DIV>Kenny Knapp
</html>




>From: Sterling W Wyatt <swwyatt@...>
>Reply-To: tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com
>To: citizensoftheusofa@yahoogroups.com,tips_and_tricks@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [tips_and_tricks] Dr. Dean's address
>Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 02:29:34 -0500
>
>My letter to my friend, Dr. Ward Franklin  Dean,
>@ R3R169787,  P.O. Box 17800,
>Pensacola FL 32522-7789
>came back marked "No longer at This Address".
>
>Does anyone know of his whereabouts and address now?
>
>Sterling Wayne Wyatt
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

Look on the federal bureau of prisons web-site. They
used to have a page to help locate federal inmates.



> My letter to my friend, Dr. Ward Franklin  Dean,
  "No longer at This Address".
>
> Does anyone know of his whereabouts and address now?
>




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Does anyone know if a pay garnishment can follow you to another state?