A SWARM Of Black Holes Near The Galactic Center, NO MONSTER BLACK HOLE !
"An ongoing Chandra program that monitors a region around the Milky
Way's supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*) found four
bright, variable X-ray sources (circles) EVEN WITHIN 3 light years of
Sgr A*"!
"Although the region around Sgr A* is crowded with stars, we expected
that there was only a 20 percent chance that we would find even one
X-ray binary within a three-light-year radius," said Muno. "The observed
high concentration of these sources implies that a huge number of black
holes and neutron stars have gathered in the center of the Galaxy."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 114024.htm
<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050111114024.htm>


HOW CLOSE TO THE MONSTER BLACK HOLE CAN SUCH SMALL STELLAR MASS BHS
EXIST before they are eaten by the monster, 3 lightyears?

ANSWER: THERE IS NO MONSTER BH IN THE CENTER OF SPIRAL GALAXIES.
THERE IS ONLY A LOCAL WHITE (GREY) HOLE IN THE LOCAL VACUUM STRUCTURE
ORIGINATED BY AT LEAST TWO PRIMORDIAL MONSTER BHs LOCATED OUTSIDE THE
GALAXY!
SEE ALSO M31:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/R ... ABHs+1.jpg
<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/R8xhbwsZz4I/AAAAAAAAAhI/qNiXJdppk\
TE/s1600-h/Sombrero+GABHs+1.jpg>
--- In time@yahoogroups.com, "l_vuyk" <levu@...> wrote:
>
>
> ELECTRIC UNIVERSE THEORY extension is needed.
>
> Here I present strong indications that the existing ideas described in
> the "electric universe" theory, need to be extended by a new black
hole
> paradigm described below, able to explain all these charged objects
like
> Comets up to Galaxy clusters.
>
> for solar examples see, the electric sun
>
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9IJHVbCI/AAAAAAAAAEc/PuvylOrUc\
\
> yE/s1600-h/SOLAR+SABHs+1.jpg> : and
>
> http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/thornhill.htm
> <http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/thornhill.htm>
> by David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill.
>
> "The Sun's heliospheric circuit is connected to the galaxy via the
> central column and the disk of charged particles. The current path is
> traced by magnetic fields. The "open" helical magnetic fields
discovered
> high above the Sun's poles by the Ulysses spacecraft are supportive of
> Alfvén's stellar circuit model. And the solar "wind" would seem to
> connect to the broader disk of charged particles about the
heliosphere"
>
> The new black hole paradigm predicts in contrast with mainstream
models,
> some different black hole- and Higgs vacuum qualities.
> 1, The vacuum is equipped with a triangle/ tetrahedron network of
linear
> Higgs trajectories oscillating along these trajectories, and
> transmitting photonic FORM information called "the Higgs system" which
> is responsible for the so called "spacetime".
> 2, The Higgs system comprises real shaped Higgs particles which are
able
> to change form by collision into real shaped photons or real shaped
> electrons or positrons.
> 3, electrons and positrons are each others symmetrical mirror shapes
> based on a propeller form with left- or right handed pitch.
> 4, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with each other to
> form a so called Positronium or annihilate each other by the forming
of
> one Higgs- and one photon particle.
> 5, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with some (5)
> different shaped photon particles to form all sorts of Quarks.
> 6, a SINGULARITY is a globular point in the Higgs system where the
> network of linear Higgs trajectories is interrupted and not able to
> transfer photonic information,
> 7, as a consequence, the Singularity does not emit photons or
gravitons,
> has NO MASS and is not able to have some motion inside a symmetrical
> Higgs system..
> 8, The origin of such interruptions should be found in the presence of
a
> particle KNOT which is more complex than any Quark and not able to
> create any spin or photonic radiation.
> 9, the oscillating Higgs system around such a SINGULARITY KNOT will
> originate so called CASIMIR FORCE on the singularity knot, caused by
the
> CONTINUOUS ABSORPTION of Higgs particles by the Singularity..
> 10, the Singularity Knot will originate an internal resistance
pressure
> to the Casimir force due to the flexibility of each particle
compressed
> inside the singularity.
> 11, the internal resistance pressure of the Singularity Knot is always
> in equilibrium with the external Casimir pressure, as long as the
> Casimir pressure has a symmetrical impact on the singularity. Thus,
the
> Casimir force is assumed to be not infinite.
> 12, if two singularities approach each other, the Casimir pressure
> symmetry is influenced and the singularities are forced to move in
> space, or even split in two or more parts.
> This splitting process can be observed inside many star forming
NEBULA.
> 13, the propeller shape of Leptons is supposed to be the origin of
> particle spin.
> 14, the particles spin however is supposed to be originated by the
> collision interaction with the Higgs system.
> 15 each Higgs collision is supposed to change the form of a Higgs
> particle into the form of a photonic particle.
> 16, around each Singularity the shape of the linear Higgs trajectories
> is influenced and curved into the direction of the Singularity.
> 17, as a result, there will be a globular horizon around the
singularity
> where some photonic energy will travel into the plane of this globular
> horizon.
> 18, as a consequence, this globular horizon is a place of fierce
> energetic collision between Higgs particles and a place of creation of
> photons, electrons and positrons.
> 19, if the curvature of this horizon is between certain unknown
values,
> then we may expect that positrons and electrons are able to form
quarks
> (positive and negative charged) and combine with each other to form
> protons and neutrons.
>
> See:
> http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
> <http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/>
>
>
>
> Leo Vuyk.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

ELECTRIC UNIVERSE THEORY extension is needed.

Here I present strong indications that the existing ideas described in
the "electric universe" theory, need to be extended by a new black hole
paradigm described below, able to explain all these charged objects like
Comets up to Galaxy clusters.

for solar examples see, the electric sun
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9IJHVbCI/AAAAAAAAAEc/PuvylOrUc\
yE/s1600-h/SOLAR+SABHs+1.jpg> : and

http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/thornhill.htm
<http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/thornhill.htm>
by David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill.

"The Sun's heliospheric circuit is connected to the galaxy via the
central column and the disk of charged particles. The current path is
traced by magnetic fields. The "open" helical magnetic fields discovered
high above the Sun's poles by the Ulysses spacecraft are supportive of
Alfvén's stellar circuit model. And the solar "wind" would seem to
connect to the broader disk of charged particles about the heliosphere"

The new black hole paradigm predicts in contrast with mainstream models,
some different black hole- and Higgs vacuum qualities.
1, The vacuum is equipped with a triangle/ tetrahedron network of linear
Higgs trajectories oscillating along these trajectories, and
transmitting photonic FORM information called "the Higgs system" which
is responsible for the so called "spacetime".
2, The Higgs system comprises real shaped Higgs particles which are able
to change form by collision into real shaped photons or real shaped
electrons or positrons.
3, electrons and positrons are each others symmetrical mirror shapes
based on a propeller form with left- or right handed pitch.
4, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with each other to
form a so called Positronium or annihilate each other by the forming of
one Higgs- and one photon particle.
5, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with some (5)
different shaped photon particles to form all sorts of Quarks.
6, a SINGULARITY is a globular point in the Higgs system where the
network of linear Higgs trajectories is interrupted and not able to
transfer photonic information,
7, as a consequence, the Singularity does not emit photons or gravitons,
has NO MASS and is not able to have some motion inside a symmetrical
Higgs system..
8, The origin of such interruptions should be found in the presence of a
particle KNOT which is more complex than any Quark and not able to
create any spin or photonic radiation.
9, the oscillating Higgs system around such a SINGULARITY KNOT will
originate so called CASIMIR FORCE on the singularity knot, caused by the
CONTINUOUS ABSORPTION of Higgs particles by the Singularity..
10, the Singularity Knot will originate an internal resistance pressure
to the Casimir force due to the flexibility of each particle compressed
inside the singularity.
11, the internal resistance pressure of the Singularity Knot is always
in equilibrium with the external Casimir pressure, as long as the
Casimir pressure has a symmetrical impact on the singularity. Thus, the
Casimir force is assumed to be not infinite.
12, if two singularities approach each other, the Casimir pressure
symmetry is influenced and the singularities are forced to move in
space, or even split in two or more parts.
This splitting process can be observed inside many star forming NEBULA.
13, the propeller shape of Leptons is supposed to be the origin of
particle spin.
14, the particles spin however is supposed to be originated by the
collision interaction with the Higgs system.
15 each Higgs collision is supposed to change the form of a Higgs
particle into the form of a photonic particle.
16, around each Singularity the shape of the linear Higgs trajectories
is influenced and curved into the direction of the Singularity.
17, as a result, there will be a globular horizon around the singularity
where some photonic energy will travel into the plane of this globular
horizon.
18, as a consequence, this globular horizon is a place of fierce
energetic collision between Higgs particles and a place of creation of
photons, electrons and positrons.
19, if the curvature of this horizon is between certain unknown values,
then we may expect that positrons and electrons are able to form quarks
(positive and negative charged) and combine with each other to form
protons and neutrons.

See:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
<http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/>



Leo Vuyk.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Danny Frederick]
So someone can accept your (A), that there exists an objective
three-dimensional world, while denying your (B), that there exists an
objective present (in your sense of 'objective present'). Someone who did
that would be denying that anything exists concretely in your sense; but he
would still accept that there are objective existents (past, present and
future). Basically, he would say there is a B-series but no A-series (have I
recalled those terms correctly?); he would say that there is temporal order
but no temporal passage. On this view tenses would be indexical expressions
that could be eliminated without loss by means of 'eternal sentences.'

[Adhanom Andemicael]
Please note that in statement A, I'm talking about a *concrete*,
objective, three-dimensional world. (I'm sorry I wasn't clear about this.)

In my last posting, I wrote:

"Let us consider the following two statements:

A) There exists an objective, three-dimensional world.
B) There exists an objective present.

In order for statement A to be true, statement B must be true."

However, I should have written:

"Let us consider the following two statements:

A) There exists a concrete, objective, three-dimensional world.
B) There exists an objective present.

In order for statement A to be true, statement B must be true."

***

[Adhanom Andemicael]
If there is no "objective present," there can be no concrete, objective world.

Many B-theorists claim that there is no "objective present." Yet they maintain
that there is a concrete, objective world.

***

[Danny Frederick]
So someone can accept your (A), that there exists an objective
three-dimensional world, while denying your (B), that there exists an
objective present (in your sense of 'objective present'). Someone who did
that would be denying that anything exists concretely in your sense; but he
would still accept that there are objective existents (past, present and
future). Basically, he would say there is a B-series but no A-series (have I
recalled those terms correctly?); he would say that there is temporal order
but no temporal passage. On this view tenses would be indexical expressions
that could be eliminated without loss by means of 'eternal sentences.'

[Adhanom Andemicael]
Okay.

***

[Adhanom Andemicael]
Dates that lack the property of being present are unreal.
B-series dates lack the property of being present.
Dates in this series are therefore unreal.

(Note: B-theorists claim that dates in the B-series are real.)


http://home.att.net/~Andemicael/intro.html

Target Article 61
http://www.kjf.ca/61-TAAND.htm
http://www.KJF.ca


Adhanom Andemicael
Andemicael@...

[Danny Frederick]
Hi Adhanom,

There is an ambiguity in your (B). It is a familiar one. What does the 'present
moment' mean? Is it an indexical that picks out a particular time
that we could date? Or is it a general property that applies to any moment
at the time that it is present? The existence of an objective extended
temporal dimension implies your (B) in the first case but not in the second.
To put it another way, if time is objective (as an extended dimension) then
any particular point in time (or minimally extended temporal span) is objective;
therefore the present moment (let's say noon on 24 November 2009)
is objective. But someone could admit this even if he denies that there is
any such thing as temporal presence (the now).

[Adhanom Andemicael]
One way of conceiving of time is as follows:

There is an “objective present.� This present moves (somehow) from one date
to the next (e.g., from Jan. 1, 2000 to Jan. 2, 2000). When the present arrives
at Jan. 1, Jan. 1 comes into existence. When the present arrives at Jan. 2, Jan.
2 comes into existence. (As soon as the present moves from Jan. 1 to Jan. 2,
Jan. 1 ceases to exist.)

In this conception, it is not clear what the "objective present" actually *is*.
Whatever the present is, it is something that is capable of *moving* from one
date to the next.

If this moving, objective present does not exist, dates (e.g., Jan. 1, Jan. 2,
etc.) cannot exist. (They cannot exist because they can never posses the
property of being present.)

***

In my messages, I make reference to the "objective present" and the "objective
present moment of time." Please note that I'm referring to the moving "objective
present" described above.


[Danny Frederick]
To put it another way, if time is objective (as an extended dimension) then
any particular point in time (or minimally extended temporal span) is objective;
therefore the present moment (let's say noon on 24 November 2009)
is objective.

[Adhanom Andemicael]
"12:00 PM, 24 November 2009" is a "location in time." (Note however that the
"objective present" is *not* a "location in time.")

[Adhanom Andemicael]
The "objective present" *moves* from one "location in time" to another. However,
a "location in time" remains fixed at a particular "location in time."


[Danny Frederick]
I think your (A) was badly formulated, which is why I have not referred to it.
Did you mean to say 'four-dimensional world'?

[Adhanom Andemicael]
No. Here is statement (A) again:

"A) There exists an objective, three-dimensional world."


[Adhanom Andemicael]
The following is a slightly altered version of the message I posted on Nov. 23.
I use the term "objective present" in this version. Please note that I'm
referring to the moving "objective present" described above:

***

In order for an entity to exist concretely, the entity must exist at the
present. Entities that exist in the past or the future do not exist concretely.
(Past and future entities are less real than present entities.)

Let us consider the following two statements:

A) There exists an objective, three-dimensional world.
B) There exists an objective present.

In order for statement A to be true, statement B must be true.

Is statement B true? Does there exist an objective present?

We know that the mind experiences its own *subjective* present (i.e., its own
*phenomenal* present). It is clear, therefore, that there exists a *subjective*
present. However, it is not at all clear that there exists an *objective*
present (i.e., a present that exists independently of the mind).

***

[Adhanom Andemicael]
I discuss subjective time flow in my paper "Temporal Passage":

http://home.att.net/~Andemicael/intro.html

Target Article 61
http://www.kjf.ca/61-TAAND.htm
http://www.KJF.ca



Adhanom Andemicael
Andemicael@...

In order for an entity to exist concretely, the entity must exist at the
"present moment of time." Entities that exist in the past or the future do not
exist concretely.

Let us consider the following two statements:

A) There exists an objective, three-dimensional world.
B) There exists an objective present moment of time.

In order for statement A to be true, statement B must be true.

Is statement B true? Does there exist an objective present moment of time?

We know that the mind experiences its own *subjective* present (i.e., its own
*phenomenal* present). It is clear, therefore, that there exists a *subjective*
present moment of time. However, it is not at all clear that there exists an
*objective* present (i.e., a present that exists independently of the mind).


http://home.att.net/~Andemicael/intro.html

Target Article 61
http://www.kjf.ca/61-TAAND.htm
http://www.KJF.ca


Adhanom Andemicael
Andemicael@...

It looks as if the existing ideas described in the "electric universe"
theory, need to be extended by a new black hole paradigm described
below, able to explain all these charged objects like Comets up to
Galaxy clusters.

for solar examples see, the electric sun
<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ArDoWzECXSo/Reb9IJHVbCI/AAAAAAAAAEc/PuvylOrUc\
yE/s1600-h/SOLAR+SABHs+1.jpg> : and

http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/thornhill.htm
<http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/thornhill.htm>

"The Sun's heliospheric circuit is connected to the galaxy via the
central column and the disk of charged particles. The current path is
traced by magnetic fields. The "open" helical magnetic fields discovered
high above the Sun's poles by the Ulysses spacecraft are supportive of
Alfvén's stellar circuit model. And the solar "wind" would seem to
connect to the broader disk of charged particles about the
heliosphere"



Leo.
--- In time@yahoogroups.com, "l_vuyk" <levu@...> wrote:
>
> CYGNUS-A and entropy decease.
> The most obvious example of entropy decrease in the universe.
> Cygnus-A gas production by at least two polar hotspot black holes.
>
> http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
>
> The new black hole paradigm predicts in contrast with mainstream
models, some different black hole- and Higgs vacuum qualities.
> 1, The vacuum is equipped with a triangle/ tetrahedron network of
linear Higgs trajectories oscillating along these trajectories, and
transmitting photonic FORM information called "the Higgs system" which
is responsible for the so called "spacetime".
> 2, The Higgs system comprises real shaped Higgs particles which are
able to change form by collision into real shaped photons or real shaped
electrons or positrons.
> 3, electrons and positrons are each others symmetrical mirror shapes
based on a propeller form with left- or right handed pitch.
> 4, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with each other to
form a so called Positronium or annihilate each other by the forming of
one Higgs- and one photon particle.
> 5, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with some (5)
different shaped photon particles to form all sorts of Quarks.
> 6, a SINGULARITY is a globular point in the Higgs system where the
network of linear Higgs trajectories is interrupted and not able to
transfer photonic information,
> 7, as a consequence, the Singularity does not emit photons or
gravitons, has NO MASS and is not able to have some motion inside a
symmetrical Higgs system..
> 8, The origin of such interruptions should be found in the presence of
a particle KNOT which is more complex than any Quark and not able to
create any spin or photonic radiation.
> 9, the oscillating Higgs system around such a SINGULARITY KNOT will
originate so called CASIMIR FORCE on the singularity knot, caused by the
CONTINUOUS ABSORPTION of Higgs particles by the Singularity..
> 10, the Singularity Knot will originate an internal resistance
pressure to the Casimir force due to the flexibility of each particle
compressed inside the singularity.
> 11, the internal resistance pressure of the Singularity Knot is always
in equilibrium with the external Casimir pressure, as long as the
Casimir pressure has a symmetrical impact on the singularity. Thus, the
Casimir force is assumed to be not infinite.
> 12, if two singularities approach each other, the Casimir pressure
symmetry is influenced and the singularities are forced to move in
space, or even split in two or more parts.
> This splitting process can be observed inside many star forming
NEBULA.
> 13, the propeller shape of Leptons is supposed to be the origin of
particle spin.
> 14, the particles spin however is supposed to be originated by the
collision interaction with the Higgs system.
> 15 each Higgs collision is supposed to change the form of a Higgs
particle into the form of a photonic particle.
> 16, around each Singularity the shape of the linear Higgs trajectories
is influenced and curved into the direction of the Singularity.
> 17, as a result, there will be a globular horizon around the
singularity where some photonic energy will travel into the plane of
this globular horizon.
> 18, as a consequence, this globular horizon is a place of fierce
energetic collision between Higgs particles and a place of creation of
photons, electrons and positrons.
> 19, if the curvature of this horizon is between certain unknown
values, then we may expect that positrons are able to form quarks and
combine with electrons into real ionized atoms.
> Leo Vuyk.
>




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

CYGNUS-A and entropy decease.
The most obvious example of entropy decrease in the universe.
Cygnus-A gas production by at least two polar hotspot black holes.

http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

The new black hole paradigm predicts in contrast with mainstream models, some
different black hole- and Higgs vacuum qualities.
1,  The vacuum is equipped with a triangle/ tetrahedron network of linear Higgs
trajectories oscillating along these trajectories, and transmitting photonic
FORM information called "the Higgs system" which is responsible for the so
called "spacetime".
2, The Higgs system comprises real shaped Higgs particles which are able to
change form by collision into real shaped photons or real shaped electrons or
positrons.
3, electrons and positrons are each others symmetrical mirror shapes based on a
propeller form with left- or right handed pitch.
4, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with each other to form a so
called Positronium or annihilate each other by the forming of one Higgs- and one
photon particle.
5, electrons and positrons are able to "click-on" with some (5) different shaped
photon particles to form all sorts of Quarks.
6, a SINGULARITY is a globular point in the Higgs system where the network of
linear Higgs trajectories is interrupted and not able to transfer photonic
information,
7, as a consequence, the Singularity does not emit photons or gravitons, has NO
MASS and is not able to have some motion inside a symmetrical Higgs system..
8, The origin of such interruptions should be found in the presence of a
particle KNOT which is more complex than any Quark and not able to create any
spin or photonic radiation.
9, the oscillating Higgs system around such a SINGULARITY KNOT will originate so
called CASIMIR FORCE on the singularity knot, caused by the CONTINUOUS
ABSORPTION of Higgs particles by the Singularity..
10, the Singularity Knot will originate an internal resistance pressure to the
Casimir force due to the flexibility of each particle compressed inside the
singularity.
11, the internal resistance pressure of the Singularity Knot is always in
equilibrium with the external Casimir pressure, as long as the Casimir pressure
has a symmetrical impact on the singularity. Thus, the Casimir force is assumed
to be not infinite.
12, if two singularities approach each other, the Casimir pressure symmetry is
influenced and the singularities are forced to move in space, or even split in
two or more parts.
This splitting process can be observed inside many star forming NEBULA.
13, the propeller shape of Leptons is supposed to be the origin of particle
spin.
14, the particles spin however is supposed to be originated by the collision
interaction with the Higgs system.
15 each Higgs collision is supposed to change the form of a Higgs particle into
the form of a photonic particle.
16, around each Singularity the shape of the linear Higgs trajectories is
influenced and curved into the direction of the Singularity.
17, as a result, there will be a globular horizon around the singularity where
some photonic energy will travel into the plane of this globular horizon.
18, as a consequence, this globular horizon is a place of fierce energetic
collision between Higgs particles and a place of creation of photons, electrons
and positrons.
19, if the curvature of this horizon is between certain unknown values, then we
may expect that positrons are able to form quarks and combine with electrons
into real ionized atoms.
Leo Vuyk.