Not at all. I meant that it must not be ignored. Every theory, which is
coherent and corresponding to reality, is true, and it must be taken seriously.
> If you had corrected the flaws of Einstein in your published
> theory, why it is ignored by physicists of relativity theories?
This is completely irrelevant to the discussion.
Hitoshi
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Dear Hitoshi, Not at all. I meant that it must not be ignored. Every theory, which is coherent and corresponding to reality, is true, and it must be taken...
Truth is timeless. What will happen is what is logically possible given the truth of what has already happened. What actually happens occurs in an immutable...
There are many "truths" at so amny different categories. Thence, a statement like "Truth is timeless" is nothing but a dogam unless it is substantiated. I do...
Dear Dr. Kanda, Can you imagine motion without time? I can. What Einstein has created is a space-motion continuum. It is a block universe devoid of time....
Einstein's space time theory is bunk. When people learn from Karl Popper that inconsistent theories are not even wrong? Why are we dwelling on dung-heap? I do...
Dear Dr. Kanda, We cannnot say that the whole of Einstein's theory is bunk. We can say that it is founded on assumptions that were artificially made to suit...
I recomend that you discuss this with Kaprl Popper. He was one of those very few who understood both logic and physics. I trust that he was absolutley correct....
Dear Dr. Kanda, You repeatedly stated that GR is logically inconsistent. But we do not have any pin-pointing out a logical inconsistency from you. Please...
Dear Hitoshi, I would like to inform that there are (only?) two theories in the history of science that ignore the basic rule of logic: tertium non datur,...
There are inconsistencies which are metaphysical which you and Dr. Kanda stated. Those are however do not affect physical experiments and observations because...
Dear All, I agree with this (what Hitoshi says below), and this was also my intention in my mail to Dr. Kanda regarding practical (engineering) aspects...
Hello Rajiv, What you call engineering solution to the inconsistency of relativity theory has a much more effective and simpler version. Why don't you start...
Hello Prof. Kitada, SR is a logical system. Once the theory deduces a contradiction it does not matter if it is a physical part or mathematical part of the...
Hello Prof. Kitada, To begin with, those who use GR should start with a consistebcy proof of it. Otherwise there is no credible reason to even listen to these...
... From: tata024kai <tata024kai@...> Date: Monday, July 13, 2009 1:25 pm Subject: [time] Re: Timelessness ... That must mean an inertial frame should...
It is the mathematics of transformations which forced relativity paradime to have current version. You are right, mathematical physicists are heavily...
Dear Dr Kanda "mathematical physicists are heavily responsible for twisting physics to something which is not physics anymore" This is what I have been saying...
Something can be incorrect at its core but still be immensely useful. I guess it depends on what you are trying to accomplish. I had to stop thinking about...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
Offline 
Send Email