If I could ask from Einstein, he hardly understand GR, which has changed
radically from his original work.
What kind one is your reformulation of GR?
Namely, the original GR (before Riemann) was realistic, and the successors are
oscillating between realism and idealism in order to unify GR and QM. Is your
work Einsteinian (realistic) or non-Einsteinian (idealistic) or something
between them, like a la Niels Bohr (complementary).
I reformulated GR in my theory. If you want to discuss about
my theory I will discuss with you. But If you want to discuss
about GR you should ask Einstein.
Regards,
Hitoshi
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Atso, I reformulated GR in my theory. If you want to discuss about my theory I will discuss with you. But If you want to discuss about GR you should ask...
Dear Hitoshi, Thank you. If I could ask from Einstein, he hardly understand GR, which has changed radically from his original work. What kind one is your...
Atso, I think I repeatedly wanted to point out to you that what we discuss is not philosophy nor metaphysics. What I am concerned with is what we observe in...
Dear Hitoshi, It is my problem but the problem of physics, namely that physicists ignore metaphysics but at the same time use mathematics with their...
Dear Atso, I think I am beginning to understand your frustration. But the main thrust of our discussion should be to find out what went wrong, where it went...
Dear Rajiv, I have showed what are the contributions of the theory of two variables of time to philosophy, physics and theology. Those can be read from my...
Dear Atso, I am willing to state my view about what you stated beginning with Aristotle. The classical logic which goes back to Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) is...
Dear Hitoshi, ... but as a one for us to be urged to operate on it. This is the reason why we need to have physics as technology. There is no room for playing...
... It is my view that the Euclidean geometry is closed under computable real numbers. They includes all radicals. Radicals are not finite numbers. They also...
Dear Atso, On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:34:31 +0900 ... How about this sentence? This could be read even as an ironical scolding not to say anything against...
Dear Hitoshi, I make a logical reasoning, not scolding. I did not say anything about two times in my post. Once again: 1. Causality does not hold in QM. ...
Hello Dr. Eerikäinen , I have to tell you that Newton was not like that. He was not a physicist, not a mathematician. Yet he understood both way better than...
Dr. Kanda, On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:20:56 -0000 ... Yes. We learned like this. Please see e.g. V. I. Arnold, Ordinary differential equations, 1975, chap. 1. ......
... Ah, then why they use spherical coordinate system to do theoretical physics? One cannot decompose force to spherical components, can he? QM claims that...
... Pardon me, what you observe? Yes we observe trajectory in all QM and QFT experiments. The little Wilso chamber experiments. Then we are told by QM people...
The problem with current situation is that people keep changing the theory of relativity and no one knows what we are talking about anymore. I asked physicists...
Dear Dr. Kanda, If you are concerned with consistency, we need to go back to the problem of infinity. Probably we need to deny the present mathematics if you...
Hello prof. Kitada, In mathematics, what is obviously wrong is wrong. We do not defend wrong theory to the extent physicists do to defend their undefendable...
Dear Dr. Kanda, I just offered a chance for you to prove if what you say is correct. No other purpose. Why are you so excited with my offer? It seems that you...
Hello prof. Kitada, So, you think that there is no contradiction in the assumption of photon travelling with speed c in SR? Please be specific. The length...
Dear Dr. Kanda, As in the page that Rajiv quoted, in SR the velocity v is assumed to be less than c in absolute value. So there is no contradiction. SR does...
Hello Pro. Hitada, ... Then what about c+v=c nonsense which made Einstein a house hold name? As I said, there are as many versions of SR as there are defenders...
ADD ON: having said that there are as many versions of SR as the number of the defenders of SR, let me point out thatthere is one thing which is invariant...
Dear Hitoshi, Not at all. I meant that it must not be ignored. Every theory, which is coherent and corresponding to reality, is true, and it must be taken...
Truth is timeless. What will happen is what is logically possible given the truth of what has already happened. What actually happens occurs in an immutable...
There are many "truths" at so amny different categories. Thence, a statement like "Truth is timeless" is nothing but a dogam unless it is substantiated. I do...
Dear Dr. Kanda, Can you imagine motion without time? I can. What Einstein has created is a space-motion continuum. It is a block universe devoid of time....
Einstein's space time theory is bunk. When people learn from Karl Popper that inconsistent theories are not even wrong? Why are we dwelling on dung-heap? I do...
Dear Dr. Kanda, We cannnot say that the whole of Einstein's theory is bunk. We can say that it is founded on assumptions that were artificially made to suit...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
Offline 
Send Email
