Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
time · Time in Physics and Philosophy

Group Information

  • Members: 150
  • Category: Philosophy
  • Founded: Apr 28, 1999
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
"DURATION" HAS CAUSED "PAST PROBLEMS" IN PHYSICS   Message List  
Reply Message #14051 of 16129 |
- - - - - - "DURATION" HAS CAUSED "PAST PROBLEMS" IN PHYSICS - - - - - -

Duration: "the time during which something lasts or continues" (Oxford).

A biophysical meaning is thence: "an interval during which scalar labels
of time can impinge upon a 'Mental Thought Process, MTP,' should such an
'MTP' coexist & receive Duration Event 'Mental Vector Processes, MVPs'."

A "Past Duration" can continue to exist AFTER the "Duration Now Events,"
just as "past scalar labels of time ('timetags')" can continue to exist.

Durations can also be "formed" independently of "Mental Thoughts, MTPs."

Duration is a difference between two temporal scalar labels, & therefore
it is also a scalar quantity with magnitude, but "NO SPACIAL DIRECTION."

If one flies south (from Canada) for 2 hrs at 500 km/hr the displacement
is 1000 km, which is a vector with magnitude 1000 km, & direction south.
But the 2 hr duration is here only "ASSOCIATED WITH" such a displacement
vector, and the "2 hrs" REMAINS a scalar quantity, as are ALL durations.

Such fact, often not incorporated in physics, points to "PAST PROBLEMS!"

Students of our past have learned the concept "distance is rate x time."
But this relationship should be "distance is rate x duration (of time)."
Similarly, "displacement is velocity x duration (of time)," where such a
"scalar duration" is the ratio of "vector displacement/vector velocity."

But a "duration (of time)" is redundant, as all durations are "of time!"
Thus: - - - - - - - - - "distance = rate x duration" - - - - - - - - - &
- - - - - - - - - - "displacement = velocity x duration" - - - - - - - .
BUT, with 2 temporal concepts * (time & "Time") the brackets are useful.

Yes!! There NEED BE no "spacial direction" associated with any duration;
& also no "spacial direction" IS NEEDED with any temporal scalar labels.

Temporal concepts are measured in: seconds, minutes, hours, days, years,
etc. These units are all durations, often measured by "rhythmic clocks."
Real "TIME" however, is "The mental & scalar reading OF various clocks."
Thus, ==> "ALL REAL TIME IS NOW TIME" <== (Concept #57 of "RBC Theory").

"Chimo," Inuktitut meaning: "<To Your Great Health & Great Happiness!>."
"A duration (of time)" is this day #(365250+/-1461)+365250+2544=~#733044
in this 3rd Millennium. "A duraTion (of Time)" is: day #353 of this "Sun
Cycle," or this 07:00:00 hrs, min, sec of "NLTime" (not "time"), 'peter'
Upper case "Ts" in "duraTion, Time, & NLTime," symbolize "RhythmicTime."

- - - - - Seemingly Important, and Hopefully Useful References - - - - -
Duration = Space/Speed see: <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13133>.
More on Duration (timetags) <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13218>.
For "MTP," & mind concepts: <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13743>.
For concepts of "MVPs" see: <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13983>.
* For TIME'S DUALITIES see: <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13984>.
(Suggest copy to email & format each @ <73 char./line, for 1 page side.)



Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:30 am

drpeterbeamish
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Message #14051 of 16129 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

- - - - - - "DURATION" HAS CAUSED "PAST PROBLEMS" IN PHYSICS - - - - - - Duration: "the time during which something lasts or continues" (Oxford). A biophysical...
peter beamish
drpeterbeamish Offline Send Email
Dec 19, 2007
10:30 am

peter --- distance is AVERAGE rate times time. There is a major difference between 'rate' and 'average rate'. Students really do not have to be taught this...
Gary Vezzoli
garyvezzoli0... Offline Send Email
Dec 19, 2007
12:04 pm

Gary Vezzoli [time] wrote: peter -- distance is AVERAGE rate times time. Gary -- No! Distance is average rate times duration! This is now because we define...
peter beamish
drpeterbeamish Offline Send Email
Dec 19, 2007
6:56 pm

peter -- Yes, I am making the point that you must include average with the word rate. I am not arguing against the term 'time duration'. When we utilize the...
Gary Vezzoli
garyvezzoli0... Offline Send Email
Dec 20, 2007
1:46 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help